Search: penalty u/s 271

8 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 168clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)20 Penalty8 Addition to Income6 Section 143(3)5 Section 143(2)4 Section 254(1)4 Section 2503 Section 80P(2)(d)3 Deduction

SHRI PRAKASH F.SINGH,,VAPI vs. THE ITO, WARD-7,, VAPI

In the result, appeals of the Assessees (in ITA No

ITA 618/SRT/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Nov 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shripawan Singh, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.618/Srt/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2011-12) (Virtual Court Hearing) Prakash F Singh, The Income Tax Officer, V Ward-7, Room No.810, 8Th Floor, Rbl, 63/751, Chanod Colony, Gidc, S. Vapi-396195 Fortune Square-Ii, Vapi Daman Road, Chala, Vapi-396191 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.:Asnps 4835N (Assessee) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri A. Gopalakrishnan,C.AFor Respondent: Mrs. AnupamaSingla– Sr.DR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act on the ground that penalty levied for both concealment as well as furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income is double mind of the Assessing Officer. The Ld Counsel referred to the decisions of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Samson Perinchery, 88 taxmann.com 413 and the decision

SHRI PRAKASH F.SINGH,,VAPI vs. THE ITO, WARD-7,, VAPI

SHRI PRAKASH F.SINGH,,VAPI vs. THE ITO, WARD-7,, VAPI

SHRI GUFRAN AHMED CHAUDHARI,,VALSAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, VAPI WARD-1,, VAPI

PRAMOD N. PRAJAPATI,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, VAPI, VAPI

SHRI VITHALBHAI KADVABHAI KORAT,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(3)(1), SURAT

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT vs. SEJAL JEWELLERS PVT. LTD.,, SURAT

BAKIR PACHORIWALA,VALSAD vs. ITO, WARD-1, , VALSAD

VIHAN VIBHAG CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2(2)(5), SURAT

VITHALBHAI HARJIBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD3(2)(4), SURAT