Search: penalty u/s 271

96 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 153A(1)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(b)341 Section 142(1)242 Section 143(3)146 Section 153A141 Penalty90 Section 27479 Section 13267 Section 254(1)61 Search & Seizure

SURESH B DESAI,,SURAT vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1720/AHD/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jul 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं./I.T.A.No’S.1720 & 1721/Ahd/2017 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13 Suresh B Desai, Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of 101, Vishal Apartment, Near Jamna Income Tax, Central Circle – Nagar Bus Stand, Ghod Dod Road, 3, Surat. Surat – 395 007. [Pan: Aappd 7237 H] अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri Rasesh Shah – Ca िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Shri S.R.Meena –Sr.Dr राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By 26.07.2019 सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 26.07.2019 उ"ोषणाक"तारीख/Pronouncement On: आदेश /O R D E R Per O.P.Meena, Am: The Above Two Appeals By The Assessee Are Directed Against The 1. Common Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-4, Surat (In Short The “Cit(A)”) Dated 29.05.2017 For The A.Y. 2011-12 & 2012-13 Challenging The Confirmation Of Penalty Levied U/S.271(1)(C) Of The Act Amounting To Rs.2,01,980/- & Rs.18,370/- Respectively.

Section 132Section 132(1)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

u/s. 153A are separate and have no relevance to earlier assessment proceedings. There is no variation between income returned and income assessed. Consequently, it cannot be said that there is any concealment of income so as to attract penalty provisions under section 271(1

Showing 1–20 of 96 · Page 1 of 5

SURESH B DESAI,,SURAT vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, SURAT

SURESH B DESAI,,SURAT vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, SURAT

SURESH B DESAI,,SURAT vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, SURAT

KASHYAP MAGANBHAI VAGHASIYA,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SURAT

KASHYAP MAGANBHAI VAGHASIYA,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SURAT

KASHYAP MAGANBHAI VAGHASIYA,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SURAT

KASHYAP MAGANBHAI VAGHASIYA,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SURAT

KASHYAP MAGANBHAI VAGHASIYA,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

HANSABEN MAGANBHAI VAGHASIYA,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT

HANSABEN MAGANBHAI VAGHASIYA,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT

HANSABEN MAGANBHAI VAGHASIYA,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT

HANSABEN MAGANBHAI VAGHASIYA,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT

HANSABEN MAGANBHAI VAGHASIYA,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT

HANSABEN MAGANBHAI VAGHASIYA,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT