Search: penalty u/s 271

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 144Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Allahabad37 Delhi28 Mumbai25 Indore13 Chennai12 Bangalore9 Lucknow8 Hyderabad5 Surat4 Ahmedabad4 Jaipur3 Kerala3 Pune3 Amritsar2 Chandigarh2 Kolkata2 Rajkot2 Agra1 Raipur1 Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 254(1)4 Addition to Income4 Section 145(3)3 Section 53A3 Survey u/s 133A3 Undisclosed Income3

SURAT ROUGH DIAMOND SOURCING (INDIA) LIMITED,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(3),, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2571/AHD/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Dec 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) Surat Rough Diamond Sourcing The Income Tax Officer, (India) Limited, Ward-4(3), Surat. Vs C-401/403, Diamond World, Mini Bazar, Varachha Road, Surat – 395006. Pan: Aaocs 9292 D Assessee / Appellant Revenue /Respondent

Section 144ASection 234ASection 254(1)Section 271

penalty u/s 271(l)(c) ofthe Act. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter, edit, delete, modify or change all or any of the grounds of appeal at the time of or before the hearing of the appeal.” 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a company engaged in the sourcing of rough diamonds, filed

SURAT ROUGH DIAMOND SOURCING (INDIA) LIMITED,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(3),, SURAT

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2(3),, SURAT vs. M/S. RAJ ENTERPRISES,, SURAT

SURAT ROUGH DIAMOND SOURCING (INDIA) LIMITED,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(3),, SURAT

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2(3),, SURAT vs. M/S. RAJ ENTERPRISES,, SURAT

M/S. RAJ ENTERPRISE,,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6,, SURAT

M/S. RAJ ENTERPRISE,,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6,, SURAT