Search: penalty u/s 271

195 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 143(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(b)146 Section 142(1)119 Section 271(1)(c)113 Section 143(3)103 Penalty83 Addition to Income70 Section 254(1)50 Section 27447 Section 153A42

SHRI VIJAY CHAMPAK PATEL,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(4), SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 281/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat09 Oct 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.281/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2011-12) Vijay Champak Patel, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Pachhlu Faliyu, Near Water Ward-6(4), Surat Tank, Bharthana, Vesu, Surat

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah - CAFor Respondent: Shri O P Meena – Sr. DR

Section 139Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 54ESection 54F

section 54F of the Act, during the assessment proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Act, while making the addition the Assessing Officer had initiated penalty proceedings u/s.271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act observing as follows:- “By claiming incorrect deduction, the assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars of his income, for which, penalty proceedings u/s. 271

Showing 1–20 of 195 · Page 1 of 10

...

SHRI VIJAY CHAMPAK PATEL,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(4), SURAT

SHRI VIJAY CHAMPAK PATEL,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(4), SURAT

MOULIMANI IMPEX PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER -1(1)(3), SURAT, SURAT

MOULIMANI IMPEX PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER -1(1)(3), SURAT, SURAT

MOULIMANI IMPEX PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER- 1(1)(3), SURAT, SURAT

MOULIMANI IMPEX PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER- 1(1)(3), SURAT, SURAT

JIGNA JAYESHKUMAR MACWAN,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-2, SURAT, SURAT

JIGNA JAYESHKUMAR MACWAN,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-2, SURAT, SURAT

JIGNA JAYESHKUMAR MACWAN,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-2, SURAT, SURAT

JIGNA JAYESHKUMAR MACWAN,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-2, SURAT, SURAT

JIGNA JAYESHKUMAR MACWAN,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-2, SURAT, SURAT

JIGNA JAYESHKUMAR MACWAN,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-2, SURAT, SURAT

JIGNA JAYESHKUMAR MACWAN,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-2, SURAT, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

DILIPKUMAR SHI vs. HANKAR ACHARYA,SURATVS.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE -2, SURAT