Search: penalty u/s 271

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 120(4)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai183 Delhi112 Jaipur51 Raipur45 Bangalore41 Chennai35 Rajkot29 Allahabad23 Kolkata22 Pune17 Chandigarh16 Indore15 Visakhapatnam12 Hyderabad11 Ahmedabad8 Cuttack7 Lucknow6 Guwahati5 Nagpur3 Cochin3 Surat2 Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 54B4 Section 41(1)3 Section 143(2)2 Penalty2 Disallowance2 Addition to Income2

SHRI FARSURAM RATILAL BHAMWALA,,BHARUCH vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1,, BHARUCH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1935/AHD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat14 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A) & Ld. Cit(A) After Considering The Case Of Both The Parties Dismissed The Appeal Filed By The Assessee.

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Anupma Singla, Sr. D.R

Section 234BSection 274Section 41(1)

penalty proceedings u/s 274 r.w.s 271(l)(c) of the Act.” Ground No. 1 4. This ground raised by the assessee relates to challenging the order of ld. CIT(A) in confirming the action of ITO in making additions of Rs. 5,36,556/- u/s. 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 5. Ld. A.R. appearing on behalf

SHRI FARSURAM RATILAL BHAMWALA,,BHARUCH vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1,, BHARUCH

KRISTINA NATHABHAI KRICHCHAN,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3), SURAT

SHRI FARSURAM RATILAL BHAMWALA,,BHARUCH vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1,, BHARUCH

KRISTINA NATHABHAI KRICHCHAN,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3), SURAT