Search: penalty u/s 271

10 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 113clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 80I32 Section 271(1)(c)14 Section 143(3)8 Section 1487 Section 143(2)6 Penalty6 Addition to Income5 Deduction5 Section 2744

HASMUKHBHAI DAHYABHAI PATEL,VAPI vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VAPI CIRCLE,, VAPI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 115/SRT/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat19 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: SHRI PAWAN SINGH (Judicial Member), DR. A. L. SAINI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr- DR

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

Section 271(1)(c) are clearly applicable and it is deemed that the assessee had concealed his particulars of income. In view of above, the Assessing Officer held that assessee has without any reasonable cause ‘concealed his income’ to the extent of Rs.2,97,79,023/- and evaded the tax thereon within the meaning of u/s 271

HASMUKHBHAI DAHYABHAI PATEL,VAPI vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VAPI CIRCLE,, VAPI

HASMUKHBHAI DAHYABHAI PATEL,VAPI vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VAPI CIRCLE,, VAPI

KHODIYAR ORGANISERS, SURAT,SURAT vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(3), SURAT, SURAT

N CORE CABLES,,DAMAN vs. THE ACIT, VAPI CIRCLE,, VAPI

N CORE CABLES,DAMAN vs. THE ACIT,VAPI CIRCLE,, VAPI

N CORE CABLES,DAMAN vs. THE ACIT,VAPI CIRCLE,, VAPI

N CORE CABLES,DAMAN vs. THE ACIT,VAPI CIRCLE,, VAPI

SHREE HARI PROCESSORS INDIA PVT. LTD.,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - 2(1)(2) (NEW ITO WD. 2(1)(3), SURAT

SHRI HITESHBHAI H TAHILRAMANI,SURAT vs. ITO WARD 1(3)(2), SURAT

MADHUBEN NAROTTAMBHAI PATEL,NA vs. ARIVS.ITO, WARD-3, NAVSARI

DIVYABEN PRAFULCHANDRA PARMAR,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3)(1), SURAT