Search: penalty u/s 271

5 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Penny Stockclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai90 Ahmedabad25 Jaipur17 Kolkata16 Delhi13 Hyderabad12 Surat5 Pune4 Indore4 Raipur4 Lucknow3 Cuttack2 Ranchi2 Rajkot2 Jodhpur1 Bangalore1 Chennai1 Guwahati1 Agra1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)9 Section 1485 Section 143(3)4 Section 2744 Penalty4 Addition to Income4 Section 683 Long Term Capital Gains3 Section 254(1)

DHAVAL INDRAVADAN GANDHI,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2, BARDOLI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 601/SRT/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Oct 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain () & Shri Om Prakash Kant () Assessment Year: 2012-2013 Shri Dhaval Indravadan Gandhi, Ito Ward-2, At & Post Areth, Tal Mandvi, Aayakar Bhavan, Janta Nagar Surat-394160. Vs. Society, Bardoli-394601. Pan No. Ajjpg 4246 J Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Ms. Namita Patel, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Mr. Shaunak K. Zaveri, CA

Section 143(3)

penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) r.w.s. 274 of the Act. 271(1)(c) r.w.s. 274 of the Act. 4.0 That the appellant craves leave to add, to amend, modify, 4.0 That the appellant craves leave to add, to amend, modify, 4.0 That the appellant craves leave to add, to amend, modify, rescind, supplement or alter any of the grounds

DHAVAL INDRAVADAN GANDHI,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2, BARDOLI

YASH BHUPESHBHAI TAMAKUWALA,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(2)(5), NOW INCOME TAX OFFICER - 1(2)(6), SURAT

DHAVAL INDRAVADAN GANDHI,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2, BARDOLI

YASH BHUPESHBHAI TAMAKUWALA,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(2)(5), NOW INCOME TAX OFFICER - 1(2)(6), SURAT

DIVYABEN PRAFULCHANDRA PARMAR,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3)(1), SURAT

RUCHIT DINESHBHAI DOSHI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 2(2)(1), SURAT

ASHVIN NARAYAN BAJORIA HUF,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD1(2)(1), SURAT