Search: house property

3 results for “house property”+ Section 391clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi157 Mumbai96 Jaipur30 Bangalore22 Amritsar21 Chennai19 Ahmedabad15 SC10 Chandigarh8 Hyderabad8 Agra6 Nagpur6 Kolkata4 Raipur4 Surat3 Cuttack3 Pune3 Indore2 Lucknow1 Rajkot1 Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 2014 Addition to Income3 Section 9(1)(v)2 Section 52 Section 5(2)2 Section 9(1)2 Section 9(1)(vb)2 Double Taxation/DTAA2 TDS2

LATE MAHESH RAMANLAL MODI L/H MANISH MAHESH MODI,BHARUCH vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1, BHARUCH

In the result, ground No. VII of appeal raised by the assessee is also allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 999/SRT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth(Physical Hearing) Late Mahesh Ramanlal Modi, A.C.I.T., Through L-H Manish Mahesh Modi, Circle-1, Vs. Near Shakuntal Apartment, Dahej Bharuch. Bypass Road At Nandelav, Bharuch-392001 (Gujarat) Pan No. Adfpm 4030 N Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 115BSection 23(5)Section 24Section 254(1)Section 40Section 69A

Section 23(4)(b) of the Act of Rs. 1,26,000/-, the ld. CIT(A) held that the submission of assessee was duly considered by the Assessing Officer, which was not found acceptable to him, no supporting evidence that hotel was not fit to use was not produced by the assessee. The reference of Finance Act, 2018 which

LATE MAHESH RAMANLAL MODI L/H MANISH MAHESH MODI,BHARUCH vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1, BHARUCH

LATE MAHESH RAMANLAL MODI L/H MANISH MAHESH MODI,BHARUCH vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1, BHARUCH

THE ITO, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION),, SURAT vs. MICRO INKS LIMITED,, VAPI

MICRO INKS PVT. LTD., ( FORMERLY KNOWN AS MICRO INKS LTD.),VAPI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, ( INTL. TAXN.), SURAT