Search: house property

4 results for “house property”+ Section 374(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 13910 Section 54F8 Section 139(1)6 Section 139(4)6 Section 69A3 Deduction3 Section 254(1)2 Section 143(3)2 Section 542 Capital Gains

ITO, WARD-3(2)(4), SURAT vs. LATE KHUSHMANBHAI CHNDUBHAI PATEL-HUF, L/H. JIGISHA PATEL, SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 563/SRT/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Dec 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Physical Court) I.T.O. Late Khushmanbhai Chandubhai Patel Ward-3(2)(4), (Huf), Vs. Surat. L/H Jigisha Patel, Opp. Nityanandeshwar Mahadev Temple, Nanived, Katargam, Surat-395004. Pan : Aaihp 4025 L Appellant Respondednt

Section 143(3)Section 154FSection 2(14)Section 254(1)Section 263Section 54

374). The Assessing Officer was of the view that the exemption under Section 54 is allowable for the purpose of residential property or for construction of residential property and not for commercial property. Thus, the Assessing Officer issued show cause notice to the assessee as to why allow only proportionate deduction about residential unit. 3. The assessee furnished its detailed

ITO, WARD-3(2)(4), SURAT vs. LATE KHUSHMANBHAI CHNDUBHAI PATEL-HUF, L/H. JIGISHA PATEL, SURAT

ITO, WARD-3(2)(4), SURAT vs. LATE KHUSHMANBHAI CHNDUBHAI PATEL-HUF, L/H. JIGISHA PATEL, SURAT

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-4, SURAT, SURAT vs. M/S. SHREE KUBERJI ASSOCIATES, SURAT

SHRI PANKAJBHAI AMBALAL PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1),, SURAT

SHRI CHAMPAKBHAI AMBALAL PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3),, SURAT