Search: house property

5 results for “house property”+ Section 271Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore21 Karnataka21 Jaipur15 Mumbai13 Hyderabad9 Delhi8 Ahmedabad7 Surat5 Chennai4 Cuttack2 Cochin2 Pune2 Amritsar1 Jabalpur1 Dehradun1 Nagpur1 SC1

Key Topics

Section 26345 Section 143(3)12 Section 153C10 Section 254(1)5 Section 133A5 Section 142(1)5 Survey u/s 133A5 Limitation/Time-bar5 Section 271D2

SATYAM TEXTILE PARK,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), SURAT

In the result the ground No

ITA 91/SRT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Oct 2021AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Saini

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 254(1)Section 263Section 271DSection 40

housing project, particularly when in course of search and survey operation, no unexplained investment or unexplained expenditure were detected. The ld AR made reliance on decision of Gujarat High Court in case of Abhishek Corporation [I.T. Reference No 15 of 2003] pronounced on 07.11.2014, in which other decision of the Gujarat High Court were cited. 10. It was argued that

SATYAM TEXTILE PARK,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), SURAT

SATYAM TEXTILE PARK,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), SURAT

SATYAM TEXTILE PARK,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), SURAT

AMRUT SAROVAR,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISIONER INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), SURAT

AMRUT SAROVAR,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISIONER INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), SURAT

AMRUT SAROVAR,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISIONER INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), SURAT