Search: house property

3 results for “house property”+ Section 270A(9)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi128 Mumbai72 Chandigarh51 Bangalore33 Jaipur31 Chennai28 Hyderabad24 Ahmedabad21 Pune14 Indore12 Kolkata10 Nagpur8 Rajkot5 Lucknow4 Visakhapatnam4 Raipur3 Surat3 Guwahati2 Amritsar1 Patna1

Key Topics

Section 270A8 Section 270A(9)5 Section 243 Section 2(14)3 Penalty3 Addition to Income3 Section 270A(8)2 Section 2(14)(iii)2 Business Income2

JAYANTIBHAI JIVABHAI PATEL,BHARUCH vs. WARD NO. 1(1),, BHARUCH

In the result, the penalty imposed under Section 270A of the Act is directed to be deleted and the appeal of the assessee succeeds

ITA 962/SRT/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Apr 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

For Appellant: None for AssesseeFor Respondent: Ms. Jayshree Thakur, Sr. DR

Section 270(9)Section 270ASection 270A(6)Section 270A(7)Section 270A(8)Section 270A(9)

Section 270A(9) of the Act was also imposed @ 200% on the assessee. 4. In appeal, Ld. CIT(A) reduced the penalty to 50% of the under-reported income of Rs. 11,54,210/- with the following observations: “The income has been reduced on account of salary income revised to Rs. 54,78,950/- in revised return as against

JAYANTIBHAI JIVABHAI PATEL,BHARUCH vs. WARD NO. 1(1),, BHARUCH

JAYANTIBHAI JIVABHAI PATEL,BHARUCH vs. WARD NO. 1(1),, BHARUCH

RAJESH C DALAL-HUF,SURAT vs. ADDL/JT/DEPUTY/ASST CIT/NATIONAL E- ASSESSMENT CENTER DELHI , DELHI

BHADRABALA DHIMANTRAI JOSHI,SURAT vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1(3), SURAT