Search: house property

4 results for “house property”+ Section 253(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 2635 Section 545 Section 143(3)4 Penalty3 Addition to Income3 Section 69A2 Section 143(2)2 Section 253(3)2 Section 1482 House Property

JAYESH DOLATBHAI PATEL,VALSAD vs. ITO, WARD 2, VALSAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical 8

ITA 287/SRT/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.287/Srt/2025 Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Hybrid Hearing) Jayesh Dolatbhai Patel, Vs. Ito, Shop No.1, Arihant Saroj, M.G. Ward – 2, Road, Old Navyug Store, Valsad Valsad - 396001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Apmpp3588D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Suresh K. Kabra, Ca Respondent By Ms Jaishree Thakur, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 24/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 24/11/2025

Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 148Section 253(3)

section 253(3) of the Act. The assessee has filed affidavit giving reasons for delay in filing appeal before this Tribunal. In the affidavit, the assessee submitted that he received only the recovery notice from Department and not the original order. Thereafter, he requested JAO to provide a copy of the appellate order. He submitted that the appeal was prepared

JAYESH DOLATBHAI PATEL,VALSAD vs. ITO, WARD 2, VALSAD

JAYESH DOLATBHAI PATEL,VALSAD vs. ITO, WARD 2, VALSAD

HETALKUMAR CHANDRAKANTBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(3)(7), SURAT

RAZAK ABDULKARIM MANSURI,VAPI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-7, VAPI

DINESHBHAI JIVANBHAI SANSPARA,SURAT vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, SURAT