Search: house property

2 results for “house property”+ Section 234Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai146 Delhi142 Bangalore90 Ahmedabad32 Jaipur21 Raipur17 Kolkata14 Indore5 Chennai3 Surat2 Karnataka2 Nagpur2 Pune2 Jodhpur1 Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 26314 Section 54F8 Section 545 Section 143(3)3

SMT. MINAXIBEN HARSHADBHAI MAVANI,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3)(3),, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2604/AHD/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat14 Sept 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) Smt. Minaxiben Harshadbhai The Income Tax Officer, Mavani, Ward-1(3)(3), Surat. Vs. 204, Malhar Complex, Icchanath, Surat – 395 007. Pan: Agjpm 8034 B Applicant Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 254(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 54Section 54F

234D of the Act is not justified. 7. Initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is not justified.” 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is individual, filed its return of income for the A.Y. 2013-14 on 31.03.2014 declaring income o Rs.3,34,590/-. The case was selected for scrutiny. During

SMT. MINAXIBEN HARSHADBHAI MAVANI,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3)(3),, SURAT

SMT. MINAXIBEN HARSHADBHAI MAVANI,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3)(3),, SURAT

MR. RAMANLAL RAGHABHI PATEL ,DAMAN vs. THE PCIT, VALSAD, VALSAD