Search: house property

3 results for “house property”+ Section 234Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi296 Mumbai262 Bangalore161 Jaipur79 Chennai44 Ahmedabad36 Hyderabad23 Karnataka21 Lucknow20 Agra18 Kolkata15 Indore14 Visakhapatnam8 Nagpur7 Pune6 Guwahati5 Jodhpur4 Chandigarh4 Ranchi3 Surat3 Patna3 Rajkot1 SC1

Key Topics

Section 26314 Section 54F7 Section 234A3 Section 143(3)2 Section 254(1)2 Section 271(1)(c)2 Section 1472

DHANSUKHLAL RAMANBHAI MALI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD2(3)(1), SURAT

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 39/SRT/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat05 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Physical Court) Dhansukhlal Ramanbhai Mali, I.T.O., 10, Mali Faliya, Mota Varachha, Ward-2(3)(1), Vs. Surat. Surat. Pan: Aqppm 7151 B Appellant Respondednt

Section 131Section 144ASection 234ASection 254(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 54ESection 54F

house was constructed by utilizing sale consideration received on sale of land and thereby fulfilling all the relevant conditions as prescribed under Section 54F of the Act. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the exemption U/s 54F be given to the appellant in the interest of justice. (2) That the learned CIT(A) has erred

DHANSUKHLAL RAMANBHAI MALI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD2(3)(1), SURAT

DHANSUKHLAL RAMANBHAI MALI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD2(3)(1), SURAT

GANI MOHAMMAD POPAT,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-3, VAPI

MR. RAMANLAL RAGHABHI PATEL ,DAMAN vs. THE PCIT, VALSAD, VALSAD