Search: house property

59 results for “house property”+ Section 23clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)49 Addition to Income38 Section 26333 Section 12A25 Section 271(1)(c)17 Deduction16 Section 25015 Section 54E15 House Property14

THE UDHNA UDYOGNAGAR SAHAKARI SANGH LTD.,,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1(2), SURAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 159/SRT/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Oct 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.159/Srt/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Virtual Court Hearing) The Udhna Udhyognagar Sahakari Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Sangh Ltd, Income Tax, Central Road No.10, P. B. No.10, Circle-1(2), Surat Udhna Udhyognagar, Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaat2932K (Assessee) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Rushi Parekh - Ca Respondent By : Shri O P Meena – Sr. Dr सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 02/09/2020 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : : 13/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. A. L. Saini: By Way Of This Appeal, The Assessee Has Challenged Correctness Of The Order Dated 08.08.2017 Passed By The Learned Cit(A), In The Matter Of Assessment Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act 1961 ( For Short “The Act”), For The Assessment Year 2013-14. Grievances Raised By The Assessee, Which Are Interconnected & Will Be Taken Up Together, Are As Follows:- “1. The Learned Cit(A) Erred In Taxing The Deemed Rent Of Rs.11,12,720/- While Not Considering The Decision Of Supreme Court In Rayala Corporation Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Acit. 2. That The Cit(A) Erred In Taxing The Unsold Shops Used For The Business Of Assessee Society. 3. That The Cit(A) Erred In Taxing The Deemed Rent On Unsold Shops, Ignoring The Amendment To Section 23(5) W.E.F. Ay. 2018-19. 4. The Appellant Craves Leave To Add, Amend, Alter, Vary & / Or Withdraw Any Or All The Above Ground Of Appeal.”

For Appellant: Shri Rushi Parekh - CAFor Respondent: Shri O P Meena – Sr. DR

Section 143(3)

Showing 1–20 of 59 · Page 1 of 3

THE UDHNA UDYOGNAGAR SAHAKARI SANGH LTD.,,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1(2), SURAT

THE UDHNA UDYOGNAGAR SAHAKARI SANGH LTD.,,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1(2), SURAT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, SURAT, SURAT vs. RAHULKUMAR VINUBHAI RADADIYA, SURAT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4, SURAT, SURAT vs. KISHORBHAI MANUBHAI RADADIYA, SURAT

RAVI MEEMROT, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, SURAT, SURAT vs. MEHUL VINUBHAI RADADIYA, SURAT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCEL-4, SURAT, SURAT vs. BHARTIBEN BHOLABHAI RADADIYA, SURAT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, SURAT, SURAT vs. ANKIT BHOLABHAI RADADIYA, SURAT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, SURAT, SURAT vs. PARSHOTTAMBHAI BACHUBHAI RADADIA, SURAT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 4, SURAT, SURAT vs. ANKUR BHOLABHAI RADADIYA, SURAT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -4, SURAT, SURAT vs. CHATURBHAI MANUBHAI RADADIYA, SURAT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,-4, SURAT, SURAT vs. VIPULKUMAR MANUBHAI RADADIYA, SURAT

SHAH AND SANGHAVI DEVELOPERS LLP,VESU, SURAT vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT

JAIPRAKASH KHANCHAND ASWANI,SURAT vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), SURAT., SURAT.

MANISH UMED DOSHI,MUMBAI vs. ACIT - VAPI CIRCLE, VAPI

MITSU PRAFUL DOSHI,SURAT vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1, SURAT

PANKAJBHAI HATHIBHAI PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(3), , SURAT

MUKESH ARVINDLAL VAKHARIA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2(3)(3), SURAT

ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL CO. PVT LTD,SURAT vs. PCIT-1, SURAT

SHRI NEHRUNAGAR CO. OP HOUSING SOCIETY,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3)(5), SURAT

KETAN N. SHAH (HUF) ,VAPI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5, VAPI

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 3, SURAT, SURAT vs. SHIRI ASHESH NANALAL DOSHI, SURAT