BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “house property”+ Section 199(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka475Delhi372Mumbai313Ahmedabad119Bangalore95Chandigarh90Jaipur71Chennai60Kolkata58Calcutta51Hyderabad48Raipur35Lucknow30Rajkot25Indore19Pune19Cuttack16Telangana15SC9Surat7Cochin6Nagpur6Jodhpur4Amritsar4Rajasthan4Allahabad3Agra1Andhra Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 12A16Section 686Section 271(1)(c)6Section 50C5Section 143(3)4Section 2(15)4Addition to Income4Section 251(1)3Section 1312

SHRI GHANSHYAM DUNGARBHAI SUTARIYA,,SURAT vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-8,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is dismissed

ITA 2971/AHD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat08 Aug 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri O.P. Meenaassessment Year: 2009-10 Ghanshyam Dungarbhai Sutaria, Vs. Acit, Circle-8, H.No. 1, 1St Floor, Sahaj Park Row Surat House, Hira Baug Circle, Vallabhacharya Road, Near Kailashdham Society, Ashwanikumar Road, Surat-395008 (Pan: Akkpp9318E) (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 251(1)Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

House, Hira Baug Circle, Vallabhacharya Road, Near Kailashdham Society, Ashwanikumar Road, Surat-395008 (PAN: AKKPP9318E) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Sh. J.P. Shah, Sr. Advocate & Sh. Manish J. Shah, A.R. Department by Sh. Prasenjeet Singh, CIT(DR) ORDER PER H.S. SIDHU, JM This appeal is filed by the assessee against the impugned order dated 12.09.2014 passed

SHRI VIDHYASAGAR SANT NIVAS TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

TDS2
Exemption2
Capital Gains2

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee in ITA No

ITA 243/SRT/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Jul 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Bijayananda Pruseth (Accountant Member)

Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 2(15)Section 80G(5)

property owned by the trust. 16. We herewith enclosed the under taking as per proforma Ann-1. 17. Trust runs health center for general public at subsidies rate like Physio therapy center. Eye checkup center etc. However, no any special permission is required for these type of activities. 18. Trust does not run any Gaushala. Please kindly find the attached

SHRI VIDHYASAGAR SANT NIVAS TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee in ITA No

ITA 242/SRT/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Bijayananda Pruseth (Accountant Member)

Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 2(15)Section 80G(5)

property owned by the trust. 16. We herewith enclosed the under taking as per proforma Ann-1. 17. Trust runs health center for general public at subsidies rate like Physio therapy center. Eye checkup center etc. However, no any special permission is required for these type of activities. 18. Trust does not run any Gaushala. Please kindly find the attached

LILADEVI DOKANIA,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WD.1(2)(3), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 126/SRT/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.126/Srt/2021 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2019-20) (Virtual Court Hearing) Liladevi Dokania Income Tax Officer Ward- 1(2)(3), Aayakar Bhawan, Plot No.1/2,Mayur House, Beside Vs. Majura Gate, Surat-395001 Milleniumm Market, Ring Road, Surat-395002 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abipd 2171 Q (Appellant ) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Suresh K Kabra, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Deependra Kumar, SR-DR
Section 205

house Property”. The Tenant, while paying the rent to assessee had deducted TDS from the payment, but did not deposit in the Government account. The assessee had claimed the whole of the amount of TDS as credited against the tax payable. However, since the deductor (tenant), did not deposit the TDS amount to the credit of the Government account, therefore

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, SURAT vs. M/S. KEJRIWAL INDUSTRIES LTD.,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1509/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 May 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena

Section 131Section 143Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 154Section 68

section 68 of the Act by the AO. We further observed that the ld. CIT (A) has examined each and 19. every creditors/ lenders and given his factual findings of enquiry DCIT, Circle-1(1)(2), Surat Vs. Kejriwal Industries Ltd.,/ITA No.1509/AHD/2016 for A.Y. 2011-12 Page 38 of 49 report as well as facts of each lenders

JAGDISHCHANDRA N. NAIK,NA vs. ARIVS.INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, NAVSARI, NAVSARI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 543/SRT/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat19 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.543/Srt/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2014-15) (Physical Court Hearing) Mitesh J. Naik, Vs. The Ito, Ward-3, L/H Of Jagdishchandra N. Naik, Navsari. Vishaka Park, Soceity, Mankodia, Vijalpore, Navsari-396445 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aappn6447B (Assessee) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sapnesh Sheth, Ca Revenue By : Shri Abhishek Gautam, Sr. Dr सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 06/05/2022 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 19/07/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. A. L. Saini: Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year (Ay) 2014-15, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Valsad [In Short “The Ld. Cit(A)”] In Appeal No. Cit(A)/Vls/734/16-17 Dated 11.06.2018, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Order Passed By The Assessing Officer Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”], Dated 16.12.2016

For Appellant: Shri Sapnesh Sheth, CAFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Gautam, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 50CSection 50C(2)

Housing society, Station Road, Navsari having 49% of the share profit and same is dissolved during the year under consideration and absorbed by the proprietary concern. The assessee has pension income, commission income and earned short term capital gain by selling one immovable property during the year. During the course of assessment proceedings, it was observed by assessing officer that

SEJAL JEWELLERS PVT. LTD.,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(2),, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 435/AHD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shripawan Singh, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.435/Ahd/2017 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Virtual Court Hearing) Sejal Jewellers Pvt. Ltd, Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1)(2), V Ug-4/5 Rangila Park, Ghod Dod Surat, Aaykar Bhavan, Majura Gate, S. Road, Surat-395007 Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaqcs 8686 P (Appellant ) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri H.P. Meena– CIT-DR
Section 131Section 131(1)(d)Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 68

Properties 7,34,69,858 71,020 30,22,62,508 75,00,000 2.48 % Seva Infrastructure 4,07,37,200 3,73,986 42,02,75,928 45,00,000 1.07 % Private Limited Virgo Mercantile 35,60,379 23,34,727 18,83,13,147 45,00,000 2.39 % Private Limited Season Multitrade