Search: house property

126 results for “house property”+ Disallowanceclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 263132 Section 143(3)90 Section 54F82 Addition to Income52 Section 5444 Deduction43 Disallowance36 Section 254(1)27 Section 271(1)(c)22 Section 80I

SHRI PRAKASHBHAI PRAHLADBHAI GAMI,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3),, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3129/AHD/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 Jun 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble(Virtual Hearing) आ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.3129/Ahd/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 Prakashbhai Prahladbhai Gami, The Income Tax Officer, Gangakrupa Building, Ward-2(3)(3), Surat. B/H. Ramdev Complex, Pune Vs Village, Dist. Surat. [Pan: Adspp 6520 F] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओर से /Assessee By Shri Manish J Shah – Ar राज"वक"ओर से /Revenue By Smt. Anupama Singla – Sr.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 26.04.2021 उ"घोषणा क" तार"ख/Pronouncement On: 04.06.2021 आदेश /O R D E R Per Pawan Singh, Judicial Memeber: 1. This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Surat Hereinafter Referred As “Ld.Cit(A)” Dated 07.09.2016 For A.Y. 2013-14. The Assessee Has Raised Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The C.I.T.(Appeals) Erred In Law & On Facts In Confirming The Action Of Assessing Of Addition Of Rs.4,20,000/- To The Returned Income Of The Appellant Under The Head ‘Income From House Property’ By Estimating Notional Rent Of Rs.6,00,000/- In Respect Of Property Situated At Mumbai Without Appreciating The Facts Of The Properly. 2. The C.I.T(Appeals) Erred In Law & On Facts In Sustaining Adhoc Disallowance Of Cash Expenditure To The Extent Of 10% I.E. Rs.5,07,680/- Out Of Total Expenditure Of Rs.50,76,800/- Without Appreciating The Fact That Net Profit Ratio Of The Appellant Is Improved In The Year Under Consideration. 3. The C.I.T(Appeals) Erred In Law & On Facts In Confirming The Disallowance Of Rs.86,318/- Being Depreciation On Two Motor Cars Held By The Appellant On The Allegation Of Personal Use.”

Section 143(3)Section 23

House Property’ by estimating notional rent of Rs.6,00,000/- in respect of property situated at Mumbai without appreciating the facts of the properly. 2. The C.I.T(Appeals) erred in law and on facts in sustaining adhoc disallowance

Showing 1–20 of 126 · Page 1 of 7

SHRI PRAKASHBHAI PRAHLADBHAI GAMI,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3),, SURAT

SHRI PRAKASHBHAI PRAHLADBHAI GAMI,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3),, SURAT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 4, SURAT, SURAT vs. ANKUR BHOLABHAI RADADIYA, SURAT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCEL-4, SURAT, SURAT vs. BHARTIBEN BHOLABHAI RADADIYA, SURAT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, SURAT, SURAT vs. PARSHOTTAMBHAI BACHUBHAI RADADIA, SURAT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4, SURAT, SURAT vs. KISHORBHAI MANUBHAI RADADIYA, SURAT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -4, SURAT, SURAT vs. CHATURBHAI MANUBHAI RADADIYA, SURAT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,-4, SURAT, SURAT vs. VIPULKUMAR MANUBHAI RADADIYA, SURAT

RAVI MEEMROT, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, SURAT, SURAT vs. MEHUL VINUBHAI RADADIYA, SURAT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, SURAT, SURAT vs. RAHULKUMAR VINUBHAI RADADIYA, SURAT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, SURAT, SURAT vs. ANKIT BHOLABHAI RADADIYA, SURAT

THE UDHNA UDYOGNAGAR SAHAKARI SANGH LTD.,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1),, SURAT

THE UDHNA UDYOGNAGAR SAHAKARI SANGH LTD.,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1),, SURAT

SHRI PRAKASHBHAI PRAHLADBHAI GAMI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(3), SURAT

SHRI JAIPRAKASH KHANCHAND ASWANI,,SURAT vs. THE ADDL.CIT, RANGE-2,, SURAT

RAJESH C DALAL-HUF,SURAT vs. ADDL/JT/DEPUTY/ASST CIT/NATIONAL E- ASSESSMENT CENTER DELHI , DELHI

SHRI PRAKASHBHAI HARIBHAI AHIR,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), SURAT

HEMANT ISHWARLAL DESAI,SURAT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), SURAT

ARVINDBHAI RAMNIKLAL RAVAL HUF,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3)(6), SURAT, SURAT

ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL CO. PVT LTD,SURAT vs. PCIT-1, SURAT

SHREE HARI PROCESSORS INDIA PVT. LTD.,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - 2(1)(2) (NEW ITO WD. 2(1)(3), SURAT