Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

143 results for “disallowance”+ Section 72clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,850 Delhi1,490 Chennai477 Bangalore417 Ahmedabad341 Hyderabad341 Jaipur338 Kolkata245 Chandigarh183 Pune171 Surat143 Rajkot138 Indore116 Raipur110 Visakhapatnam97 Cochin96 Nagpur68 Amritsar60 Lucknow57 Ranchi49 Guwahati44 Allahabad34 Panaji34 SC32 Jodhpur26 Cuttack25 Patna12 Dehradun12 Jabalpur10 Varanasi9 Agra6 RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1 MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)95 Addition to Income67 Section 80P(2)(d)60 Section 26348 Section 80P45 Deduction43 Disallowance40 Section 80I36 Section 6829 Section 148

MOGAR PARTAPORE VIBHAG SEVA SAHKARI MANDLI LTD,NA vs. ARIVS.DCIT, NAVSARI CIRCLE , NAVSARI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are hereby dismissed

ITA 91/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat15 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

For Appellant: Shri Sujesh C. Suratwala, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. DR

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)Section 8O

72,620/- towards Dividend received from other Co-operative Society deduction disallowed under section u/s 80P(2)(d) which is contrary

Showing 1–20 of 143 · Page 1 of 8

...

26

Unexplained Cash Credit15

NAVAGAM VIBHAG SEVA SAHAKARI MANDLI LTD,NA vs. ARIVS.INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3 , NAVSARI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are hereby dismissed

ITA 88/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat15 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

For Appellant: Shri Sujesh C. Suratwala, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. DR

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)Section 8O

72,620/- towards Dividend received from other Co-operative Society deduction disallowed under section u/s 80P(2)(d) which is contrary

NAVAGAM VIBHAG SEVA SAHKARI MANDLI LTD.,NA vs. ARIVS.ITO, WARD 3 , NAVSARI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are hereby dismissed

ITA 86/SRT/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat15 Jul 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

For Appellant: Shri Sujesh C. Suratwala, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. DR

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)Section 8O

72,620/- towards Dividend received from other Co-operative Society deduction disallowed under section u/s 80P(2)(d) which is contrary

NAVAGAM VIBHAG SEVA SAHKARI MANDLI LTD,NA vs. ARIVS.ITO, WARD-3, NAVSARI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are hereby dismissed

ITA 89/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat15 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

For Appellant: Shri Sujesh C. Suratwala, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. DR

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)Section 8O

72,620/- towards Dividend received from other Co-operative Society deduction disallowed under section u/s 80P(2)(d) which is contrary

NAVAGAM VIBHAG SEVA SAHKARI MANDLI LTD,NA vs. ARIVS.ITO, WARD 3 , NAVSARI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are hereby dismissed

ITA 87/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat15 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

For Appellant: Shri Sujesh C. Suratwala, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. DR

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)Section 8O

72,620/- towards Dividend received from other Co-operative Society deduction disallowed under section u/s 80P(2)(d) which is contrary

BHARUCH ENVIRO INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,,ANKLESHWAR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BHARUCH CIRCLE,, BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 501/AHD/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Apr 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 234B(3)Section 254(1)Section 80Section 80I

disallowing an amount of Rs. 1,07,70,324/- in respect of provision for pit covering expenses. 9. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in upholding the action of the AO in adding back the following amount while computing the book profits under section 115JB

BHARUCH ENVIRO INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,,ANKLESHWAR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 500/AHD/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Apr 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 234B(3)Section 254(1)Section 80Section 80I

disallowing an amount of Rs. 1,07,70,324/- in respect of provision for pit covering expenses. 9. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in upholding the action of the AO in adding back the following amount while computing the book profits under section 115JB

BHARUCH ENVIRO INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,,ANKLESHWAR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BHARUCH CIRCLE,, BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 502/AHD/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Apr 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 234B(3)Section 254(1)Section 80Section 80I

disallowing an amount of Rs. 1,07,70,324/- in respect of provision for pit covering expenses. 9. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in upholding the action of the AO in adding back the following amount while computing the book profits under section 115JB

BHARUCH ENVIRO INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,,ANKLESHWAR vs. THE DY.CIT,BHARUCH CIRCLE,, BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1935/AHD/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Apr 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 234B(3)Section 254(1)Section 80Section 80I

disallowing an amount of Rs. 1,07,70,324/- in respect of provision for pit covering expenses. 9. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in upholding the action of the AO in adding back the following amount while computing the book profits under section 115JB

BHARUCH ENVIRO INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,,ANKLESHWAR vs. ADDL.CIT,BHARUCH CIRCLE,, BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 504/AHD/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Apr 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 234B(3)Section 254(1)Section 80Section 80I

disallowing an amount of Rs. 1,07,70,324/- in respect of provision for pit covering expenses. 9. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in upholding the action of the AO in adding back the following amount while computing the book profits under section 115JB

BHARUCH ENVIRO INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,,ANKLESHWAR vs. ACIT,BHARUCH CIRCLE,, BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 503/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Apr 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 234B(3)Section 254(1)Section 80Section 80I

disallowing an amount of Rs. 1,07,70,324/- in respect of provision for pit covering expenses. 9. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in upholding the action of the AO in adding back the following amount while computing the book profits under section 115JB

M/S SUMILON INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,SURAT vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 87/SRT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat10 Feb 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.87/Srt/2022 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Physical Court Hearing) M/S Sumilon Industries Pvt. Principal Commissioner Of Ltd. 6-121-A, Vairagini Wadi, Income-Tax-1, Aaykar Bhavan, Vs. Delhi Gate, Surat-395003 Majura Gate, Surat-395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadcs3567 L (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Mukund Bakshi, C.A राज"व क" ओर से /Respondent By: Shri Ashok B. Koli, Cit-D.R

For Appellant: Shri Mukund Bakshi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Ashok B. Koli, CIT-D.R

Section 14Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263

disallowance made by the AO in assessment year 2012-13 in the case of the assessee, were deleted by the Ld. CIT (A) and appeal against which has been dismissed by the tribunal on account of low tax effect. We further, observe that the Pr. CIT has not discussed as to how the assessment order passed

MURTUJA HUSAINBHAI HIRANI,NA vs. ARIVS.INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3, , NAVSARI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 196/SRT/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.196/Srt/2023 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: (2014-15) (Physical Hearing) Murtuja Hussainbhai Hirani, Vs. The Ito, Ward-3, Prop. Of R. K. Bullion, Navsari Shop No.5, Pranav Chamber Madhumati, Navsari – 396445, Gujarat. (Appellant) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aciph3680D Appellant By Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca Respondent By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr 09/06/2023 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement 26/06/2023

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40A(3)

disallowance can be made. We note that assessee`s case under consideration relates to assessment year 2014-15, where purchase in cash to the extent of Rs.20,000/- is allowed. We have gone through the assessee`s paper book and noted that each cash payment against each cash purchase, does not exceed Rs.20,000/-. Therefore, we note that cash purchase

SACH ELECTRO MECH PVT. LTD.,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(2),, SURAT

In the result ground No. 4 of the appeal is allowed

ITA 262/AHD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat09 Oct 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble(Virtual Court - Virtual Hearing) आ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.262/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 Sach Electro Mech Pvt. Ltd., V The Income Tax Officer, C/2, Maheshwari Apartment, S Ward-2(1)(2), Surat. Timaliyawad, Nanpura, . Surat – 395 001. [Pan: Aaics 8963 M] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Shri Manish J.Shah – Ar राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By Mrs. Anupam Singla – Sr.Dr

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(v)Section 36(1)(va)Section 37Section 40Section 43B

72,140/-. The case was selected for scrutiny. The assessing officer while passing the assessment order, made addition on under section 36(1)(va) of Rs. 3,11,536/-, disallowed

THE AMROLI VIBHAG VIVIDH KARYAKARI SAHKARI M LTD.,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2(3), SURAT

In the result, ground no.3 raised by the assessee is allowed

ITA 672/SRT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Dec 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.672/Srt/2023 Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Hybrid Hearing) The Amroli Vibhag Vividh Vs. The Dcit, Karyakari Sahkari M. Ltd., Circle – 2(3), Utran Amroli, Taluka Choryasi, Surat Surat – 394105. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaaat3043M (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Mehul K. Patel, Ar Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr Respondent By 18/12/2023 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement 21/12/2023

Section 143(3)Section 80ASection 80LSection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act to the tune of Rs.6,49,886/-. 5. So far as the ground no.1 is concerned, Ld. Counsel for the assessee invited our attention to the judgment passed by the Hon'ble jurisdictional Gujarat High Court in the case of Surat Vankar Sahakari Sangh Ltd. vs. ACIT, 72

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT vs. PANDESARA GREEN ENVIRONMENT WATER WELFARE COOP. SOCIETY LIMITED, SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 244/SRT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Aug 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 194A(3)(v)Section 254(1)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowed the deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act of Rs. 1.49 crore by taking a view that Sutex Cooperative Bank is not covered by the provisions of Section 80P(2)(d) as it is not a cooperative society. The assessee filed copy of registration certificate of Sutex Cooperative bank as a society. The ld. CIT(A) further

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT vs. PANDESARA GREEN ENVIRONMENT WATER WELFARE COOP. SOCIETY LIMITED, SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 246/SRT/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Aug 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 194A(3)(v)Section 254(1)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowed the deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act of Rs. 1.49 crore by taking a view that Sutex Cooperative Bank is not covered by the provisions of Section 80P(2)(d) as it is not a cooperative society. The assessee filed copy of registration certificate of Sutex Cooperative bank as a society. The ld. CIT(A) further

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT vs. PANDESARA GREEN ENVIRONMENT WATER WELFARE COOP. SOCIETY LIMITED, SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 245/SRT/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 194A(3)(v)Section 254(1)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowed the deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act of Rs. 1.49 crore by taking a view that Sutex Cooperative Bank is not covered by the provisions of Section 80P(2)(d) as it is not a cooperative society. The assessee filed copy of registration certificate of Sutex Cooperative bank as a society. The ld. CIT(A) further

GUJARAT NARMADA VALLEY FERTILIZERS & CHEMICALS LTD,SURAT vs. PR. CIT-3, VADODARA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 178/SRT/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat22 Feb 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.178/Srt/2020 Assessment Year: (2014-15) (Virtual Court Hearing) Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Vs. The Pcit-3 & Chemicals Ltd., Surat. Narmada House, Narmadanagar, Bharuch – 392015. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaacg8372Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Yogesh Shah, Ar Respondent By Shri Ashok B. Koli, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 03/01/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 22/02/2023

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 801Section 80I

72,65,30,991/- but restricted to the extent of total income. Returned income is shown at NIL. The case was assessed under section 143(3) r.w.s 144C on 29.11.2017 by determining total income of Rs.37,01,60,860/- and calculated adjusted book profit u/s.115JB at Rs.4,19,55,49,819/-. 3. On scrutiny of records, it was noticed that

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2(1)(1), SURAT vs. MANISH SUMATILAL SHAH, MUMBAI

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 382/SRT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 Oct 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Virtual Hearing) A.C.I.T., Manish Sumatilal Shah, Circle- 2(1)(1), 401, 4Th Floor, South Ridge Road, Vs. Surat. Mumbai-400006. Pan No. Adrps 1088 E Appellant/ Respondent Respondent/ Assessee

Section 254(1)Section 54F

72,63,050/-. The case was selected for scrutiny. During the assessment, the Assessing Officer noted that in the computation of total income, the assessee has shown long term capital gain of Rs. 7.19 crores and claimed deduction of entire amount under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act). The assessee was asked to furnish