BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 55Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai58Ahmedabad7Raipur6Kolkata5Delhi5Bangalore4Surat3Lucknow3Pune3Chennai2Chandigarh2Rajkot2Indore1SC1Nagpur1Jaipur1

Key Topics

Section 55A5Section 50C4Section 254(1)2Section 1482Disallowance2Addition to Income2

SARLABEN DAHYABHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(2)(4), SURAT

In the result, this ground is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 558/SRT/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

Section 254(1)Section 50CSection 54BSection 54FSection 55A

section 55A of the act for valuing impugned property edge on 1st April 1981 without pointing out any defect whatsoever in the report of government approved value submitted by assessee in support of valuation of property. (3) On the facts and circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, learned Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in confirming

MANJULABEN BABUBHAI THUMAR,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2)(6),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2997/AHD/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat12 Feb 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.2997/Ahd/2016 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 Manjulaben Babubhai Thumar, V. Income Tax Officer, Flat No.195, 01St Floor, Road No.6F, Ward-1(2)(6), Surat. Udyognagar, Udhna, Surat-394 210. [Pan: Aajpt 4629 F] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""थ"/Respondent

Section 50CSection 55A

disallowed. Therefore, the assessee further contended that if the said improvement expenses of Rs.99,44,432/- is not accepted than the matter may be referred to DVO for valuation u/s. 55A of the Act to verify the market value and the cost of improvement expenses incurred. The assessee has also submitted the registered sale deed in which sale consideration

MADHUBEN HARKISHANDAS PATEL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD2(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1085/SRT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1085/Srt/2024 (Ay 2016-17) (Physical Court Hearing) Madhuben Harkishandas Patel Income Tax Officer, Ward- 65, Vav Faliyu, Village-Sandhiyer, 2(2)(1), Surat, Aayakar Bhavan, बनाम Surat-394 130 Majura Gate, Surat-395 001 Vs [Pan : Azfpp 1116 Q] अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent

Section 147Section 148Section 151ASection 254(1)Section 55A

section 151A. Madhuben H Patel 4.On facts and circumstances of the case as well as law on subject, ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming action of AO in making addition of Rs.1,36,47,625/- being indexed cost of acquisition when no reference to DVO is made u/s 55A. 5.On facts and circumstances of the case as well