KANUBHAI VANMALIBHAI PATEL HUF,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1(2)(1), SURAT, SURAT
In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee is allowed
ITA 60/SRT/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat17 Apr 2023AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Physical Court) Kanubhai Vanmalibhai Patel I.T.O.,Ward 1(2)(1), Huf,6, Siddharth Society, Surat. Vs. Behind Afil Tower, Lambe Hanuman Road, Surat-395010. Pan: Aakhp 0725 K Appellant Respondednt
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 263Section 54B
54G of the Act and sale consideration of property in Income tax return is less than the consideration reported in Form 26QB, details of long term capital gain. The assessee further vide its reply dated
24/10/2018 furnished complete details. We find that the assessee again in response to show cause notice dated 06/11/2018, furnished the details of immovable property purchased
