Search: disallowance

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 54Gclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai19 Delhi16 Bangalore14 Kolkata8 Pune8 Jaipur7 Ahmedabad6 Karnataka5 Agra5 Chennai5 Rajkot4 Indore3 Hyderabad3 Visakhapatnam2 Jodhpur2 Surat2 Cuttack1 Chandigarh1 SC1 Cochin1 Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 2635 Section 143(3)3 Section 54B2 Section 55A2

LATE MANISHBHAI NAGINDAS GAJJAR,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(3),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for in ITA

ITA 1335/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 Dec 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri C.M.Garg & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.1335/Ahd/2016 िनधा"रण वष"/A.Y.:2011-12 Late Manishbhai Nagindas Gajjar Vs. Income Tax Officer, Through L/H Illaben Manishbhai Ward- 6(3) Surat Gajjar, 316Kh Luhar Mohhallo , Palgam, Chaurasi Surat 359009 Pan: Aovpg 1860K अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 143Section 55A

disallowed the claim of deduction under section 54B on the ground that investment in land was made on 03.07.2010 prior to sale of old assets on 20.08.2010. The CIT (A) has also confirmed the same. 16. Being, aggrieved the assessee filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted the Revenue’s contention is that

KANUBHAI VANMALIBHAI PATEL HUF,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1(2)(1), SURAT, SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee is allowed