Search: disallowance

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 273Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai64 Delhi41 Bangalore36 Chennai22 Ahmedabad16 Cochin14 Jaipur14 Hyderabad7 Amritsar7 Panaji5 Lucknow5 Kolkata5 Chandigarh4 Indore4 Visakhapatnam3 Jodhpur3 Ranchi3 Pune2 Rajkot2 Surat2 Jabalpur1 SC1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 103 Section 271(1)(c)3 Section 254(1)2 Section 270A2 Section 143(3)2 Section 2742 Penalty2 Addition to Income2

RAMILABEN KALUBHAI KAKADIA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-3(2)(3), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 216/SRT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) Ramilaben Kalubhai Kakadia, I.T.O., 62, Mira Nagar, Bhat Ni Wadi, Ward-3(2)(3), Vs. Varachha Road, Surat-395008. Surat. Pan No. Aippk 2934 G Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

disallowance. In our view, though, the assessee could not give satisfactory explanation before the Assessing Officer, however, before the ld. CIT(A), the assessee has explained the fact in proper way and gave a reasonable explanation within the meaning of Section 273B

RAMILABEN KALUBHAI KAKADIA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-3(2)(3), SURAT

DHANSUKHLAL MAGANLAL DHANGAR,NA vs. ARIVS.INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2, NAVSARI

RAMILABEN KALUBHAI KAKADIA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-3(2)(3), SURAT

DHANSUKHLAL MAGANLAL DHANGAR,NA vs. ARIVS.INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2, NAVSARI