Search: disallowance

7 results for “disallowance”+ Section 271Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai47 Chennai30 Bangalore28 Delhi25 Indore19 Ahmedabad13 Hyderabad13 Kolkata10 Agra8 Jaipur7 Surat7 Panaji5 Cochin5 Pune4 Visakhapatnam3 Nagpur2 Chandigarh2 Raipur2 SC1 Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 26345 Section 143(3)16 Section 153C11 Section 254(1)6 Section 133A5 Section 142(1)5 Survey u/s 133A5 Limitation/Time-bar5 Section 404 Disallowance

SATYAM TEXTILE PARK,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), SURAT

In the result the ground No

ITA 91/SRT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Oct 2021AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Saini

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 254(1)Section 263Section 271DSection 40

disallowance, deduction, etc., it is incumbent upon the Commissioner not to exercise his suo-motu revisional powers unless supported by adequate reasons for doing so*. It was further held that applying the aforesaid law to the facts of the present case, we are of the view that the exercise of revisional power by the Commissioner in the instant case

SATYAM TEXTILE PARK,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), SURAT

SATYAM TEXTILE PARK,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), SURAT

SATYAM TEXTILE PARK,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), SURAT

AMRUT SAROVAR,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISIONER INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), SURAT

AMRUT SAROVAR,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISIONER INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), SURAT

AMRUT SAROVAR,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISIONER INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), SURAT

ALTRET BIOTECH LTD.,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIR.-1(1)(1), SURAT

SHRI JIVRAJBHAI H. BALAR,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-8(2),, SURAT