BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 271Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai62Chennai61Delhi39Bangalore36Jaipur34Ahmedabad12Lucknow12Cochin9Hyderabad8Raipur8Rajkot7Kolkata6Panaji5Surat4Chandigarh3Indore3Visakhapatnam2Amritsar2Allahabad1SC1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 26327Section 143(3)7Section 153C6Section 271B5Section 44A5Section 254(1)4Section 133A3Section 142(1)3Survey u/s 133A3Limitation/Time-bar

SHRI ANIL OMPRAKASH MISHRA,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 314/SRT/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat03 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Virtual Hearing) Shri Anil Om Prakash Mishra, I.T.O., A-281, Shubham Bunglows, Sachin, Ward-1(2)(1), Vs. Surat-394230. Surat. Pan No. Ajnpm 7661 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 254(1)Section 271BSection 44A

disallowance of total expenses of Rs. 72,000/-, out of which Rs. 36,000/- on account of telephone expenses and Rs. 36,000/- on account of conveyance expenses. The Assessing Officer initiated penalty for failure to comply with the provisions of Section 44AB of the Act. The Assessing Officer levied penalty of Rs. 1,50,000/- under Section 271B

3

AMRUT SAROVAR,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISIONER INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), SURAT

In the result the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in all three assessment years are allowed

ITA 92/SRT/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Oct 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 254(1)Section 263

271B ( in all three AYs), the ld AR for the assessee submits that the assessee made declaration under IDS, the provisions of section 271D are not applicable. On merits it is submitted that the assessee did not take any loan and therefore the provisions of section 271D are not applicable. The amount involved was booking advances and not loan

AMRUT SAROVAR,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISIONER INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), SURAT

In the result the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in all three assessment years are allowed

ITA 93/SRT/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Oct 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 254(1)Section 263

271B ( in all three AYs), the ld AR for the assessee submits that the assessee made declaration under IDS, the provisions of section 271D are not applicable. On merits it is submitted that the assessee did not take any loan and therefore the provisions of section 271D are not applicable. The amount involved was booking advances and not loan

AMRUT SAROVAR,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISIONER INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), SURAT

In the result the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in all three assessment years are allowed

ITA 94/SRT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Oct 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 254(1)Section 263

271B ( in all three AYs), the ld AR for the assessee submits that the assessee made declaration under IDS, the provisions of section 271D are not applicable. On merits it is submitted that the assessee did not take any loan and therefore the provisions of section 271D are not applicable. The amount involved was booking advances and not loan