BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

192 results for “disallowance”+ Section 250(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,018Delhi1,353Kolkata866Bangalore629Ahmedabad588Chennai514Jaipur480Pune447Cochin250Hyderabad227Chandigarh199Amritsar193Surat192Rajkot187Indore179Raipur172Visakhapatnam139Nagpur124Lucknow115Patna113Panaji112Guwahati105Allahabad54Agra47Jodhpur47Ranchi37Jabalpur32Cuttack31Dehradun30SC13Varanasi6A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 25079Addition to Income78Section 271(1)(c)51Disallowance49Section 80P(2)(d)48Section 143(3)46Section 6835Section 14832Deduction29Section 144

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2(1)(1), SURAT vs. MANISH SUMATILAL SHAH, MUMBAI

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 382/SRT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 Oct 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Virtual Hearing) A.C.I.T., Manish Sumatilal Shah, Circle- 2(1)(1), 401, 4Th Floor, South Ridge Road, Vs. Surat. Mumbai-400006. Pan No. Adrps 1088 E Appellant/ Respondent Respondent/ Assessee

Section 254(1)Section 54F

disallowed the deduction under Section 54F by taking a view that the 11 ACIT Vs Manish Sumatilal Shah assessee is eligible for claim of deduction under Section 54F of the Act in respect of one residential house. Before the ld. CIT(A), the assessee submitted that all four residential flats are a single residential house. All four flats were merged

KIRTIKUMAR NAGINDAS SHAH,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(6), SURAT

In the result, ground No.2 raised by the assessee is allowed

Showing 1–20 of 192 · Page 1 of 10

...
19
Section 14A19
Penalty19
ITA 535/SRT/2023[2014-15]Status: Disposed
ITAT Surat
12 Oct 2023
AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Dr. A. L. Sainiआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.535/Srt/2023 Assessment Year: (2014-15) (Physical Hearing) Kiritkumar Nagindas Shah, Vs. The Ito, A-1103, Regent Residency, Near Ward – 2(3)(6), Saurabh Society, Pal, Surat Surat – 395009, Gujarat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Anjps9031P (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 145Section 14ASection 40

250 3. Dividend income 23 However, you have not furnished any separate account for expenses incurred for earring of exempt income. Hence, section 14 of the I.T. Act attracts in your case. Therefore, you are asked to furnish explanation as to why expenditure incurred of Rs.7,56,965/- for earning exempt income should not be disallowed

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VAPI CIRCLE,, VAPI vs. M/S. MITSU LIMITED,, DAMAN

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3510/AHD/2016[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 May 2020AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri Sandip Gosain & Shri O. P. Meenav. ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं././././I "नधा"र अपीलाथ" Appellant S .T.A No. ण N वष"/A Y: 1 1671/Ah 2002- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant D/2006 03 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 2 1371/Ah 2002- Assistant V. M/S. Mitsu Limited, D/2006 03 Commissioner Of 304/2, Iind Phase, Income Tax-Vapi Gidc, Vapi 396195 Circle, Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Co.No.1 2002- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant 3 84/Ahd/ 03 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of 2006 Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 4 1672/Ah 2003- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant D/2006 04 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 5 1764/Ah 2003- Assistant V. M/S. Mitsu Limited, D/2006 04 Commissioner Of 304/2, Iind Phase, Income Tax-Vapi Gidc, Vapi 396195 Circle, Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q 6 1000/Ah 2002- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant D/2016 03 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 7 3510/Ah 2000- Assistant V. M/S. Mitsu Limited, D/2016 01 Commissioner Of Page 2 Of 83 Mitsu Ltd. V. Acit- Vapi/I.T.A. No.1671-1371,Co-184,1672-1764,1614 &1000/Ahd/2006/A.Y.02-03,03-04,06-07.02-03 Income Tax-Vapi 304/2, Iind Phase, Circle, Vapi Gidc, Vapi 396195 Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q

Section 143

5 states that the ld. CIT (A) has erred in deleting the disallowance of Rs.1,250 made out of telephone expenses, without considering the fact the assessee himself disallowed Rs.50,000 on this account. 80. Brief facts are that the AO has disallowed 1/5th of telephone expenses of Rs.51,250 which worked out to Rs. 1,250 by observing that

M/S. MITSU PRIVATE LIMITED,,VAPI vs. THE ACIT, VAPI CIRCLE,, VAPI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1000/AHD/2016[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 May 2020AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri Sandip Gosain & Shri O. P. Meenav. ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं././././I "नधा"र अपीलाथ" Appellant S .T.A No. ण N वष"/A Y: 1 1671/Ah 2002- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant D/2006 03 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 2 1371/Ah 2002- Assistant V. M/S. Mitsu Limited, D/2006 03 Commissioner Of 304/2, Iind Phase, Income Tax-Vapi Gidc, Vapi 396195 Circle, Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Co.No.1 2002- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant 3 84/Ahd/ 03 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of 2006 Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 4 1672/Ah 2003- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant D/2006 04 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 5 1764/Ah 2003- Assistant V. M/S. Mitsu Limited, D/2006 04 Commissioner Of 304/2, Iind Phase, Income Tax-Vapi Gidc, Vapi 396195 Circle, Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q 6 1000/Ah 2002- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant D/2016 03 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 7 3510/Ah 2000- Assistant V. M/S. Mitsu Limited, D/2016 01 Commissioner Of Page 2 Of 83 Mitsu Ltd. V. Acit- Vapi/I.T.A. No.1671-1371,Co-184,1672-1764,1614 &1000/Ahd/2006/A.Y.02-03,03-04,06-07.02-03 Income Tax-Vapi 304/2, Iind Phase, Circle, Vapi Gidc, Vapi 396195 Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q

Section 143

5 states that the ld. CIT (A) has erred in deleting the disallowance of Rs.1,250 made out of telephone expenses, without considering the fact the assessee himself disallowed Rs.50,000 on this account. 80. Brief facts are that the AO has disallowed 1/5th of telephone expenses of Rs.51,250 which worked out to Rs. 1,250 by observing that

SURESHKUMAR MAVJIBHAI BHINGARADIA, INDIVIDUAL,BHARUCH vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE 2(1)(1), VADODARA, VADODARA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 355/SRT/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat10 Feb 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.355/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Physical Hearing) Sureshkumar Mavjibhai Bhingaradia, Vs. The Acit, Plot No.3441/B, Near Pci Chowkdi, Circle – 2(1)(1), Gidc Estate, Bharuch - 393002 Vadodara "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Acqpb6047G (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Tushar P. Hemani, Sr. Advocate With Shri Parimalsinh B. Parmar, Advocate Respondent By Shri Mukesh Jain, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 01/01/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 10/02/2025

Section 10Section 143(3)Section 144Section 148Section 14ASection 250

250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’) dated 01.03.2024 by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [in short, ‘CIT(A)’] for the assessment year (AY) 2012-13. 2. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as under: “1. The Ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi

M/S N. A. SHAIKH,ANKLESHWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(5), BHARUCH

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 94/SRT/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Mar 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Physical Hearing) M/S N.A. Shaikh, I.T.O., Shop No. 1, Old Shopping Centre, Ward 2(5), Vs. Nr. Pratin Crossing, Gidc, Bharuch. Ankleshwar-393002. Pan No. Aabfn 9617 R Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 2Section 250(6)Section 254(1)Section 40

5), Vs. Nr. Pratin Crossing, GIDC, Bharuch. Ankleshwar-393002. PAN No. AABFN 9617 R Appellant/ assessee Respondent/ revenue Assessee represented by Shri Deven Kapadia, CA Respondent represented by Shri Vinod Kumar, (Sr.DR) Appeal instituted on 06/02/2023 Date of hearing 29/03/2023 Date of pronouncement 29/03/2023 Order under Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE - 1(1)(1), SURAT vs. ENVIRO CONTROL PVT. LTD., , SURAT

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 307/SRT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 Jan 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.274 & 307/Srt/2022 ("नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: (2013-14 & 2017-18) (Virtual Court Hearing) Assistant Commissioner Of Enviro Control Pvt. Ltd., Income-Tax, Circle-1(1)(1), Vs. Enviro House, Opp. Bank Of Surat, Room No.108, 1St Floor, Maharshtra, Ghod Dod Road, Surat- Aayakar Bhawan, Majura 395007 Gate, Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaace 8700 C (Assessee) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 14A

5. Further, even after not claiming the income as exempt, the respondent has inadvertently disallowed of Rs.10,000 as incurred for earning exempt income, which fact can be verified from computation of income. Moreover, on going through the computation of income as enclosed in Annexdure-1 and relevant extract from audited financials enclosed as Annexure-3, your honours may note

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1(1)(1), SURAT vs. ENVIRO CONTROL PVT. LTD., SURAT

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 274/SRT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.274 & 307/Srt/2022 ("नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: (2013-14 & 2017-18) (Virtual Court Hearing) Assistant Commissioner Of Enviro Control Pvt. Ltd., Income-Tax, Circle-1(1)(1), Vs. Enviro House, Opp. Bank Of Surat, Room No.108, 1St Floor, Maharshtra, Ghod Dod Road, Surat- Aayakar Bhawan, Majura 395007 Gate, Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaace 8700 C (Assessee) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 14A

5. Further, even after not claiming the income as exempt, the respondent has inadvertently disallowed of Rs.10,000 as incurred for earning exempt income, which fact can be verified from computation of income. Moreover, on going through the computation of income as enclosed in Annexdure-1 and relevant extract from audited financials enclosed as Annexure-3, your honours may note

BALA FILLING STATION,BHARUCH vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, BHARUCH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 822/SRT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shripawan Singh& Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.822/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Hybridhearing) Bala Filling Station Vs. The Acit, Opp. Geb Substation, Jambusar Circle - 1, Road,Jambusar - 392150, Gujarat Bharuch "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aagfb8418F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

Section 194C(6)Section 250Section 40Section 68

250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’),dated 10.06.2024by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [in short ‘CIT(A)’]for the Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18. 2. Grounds of appeal raised by the assesseeare as under: “1.The Appellant prays and an appeal that the learned CIT Appeals NFAC has erred

VAMA INFRA,SURAT vs. DY.CIT CRICLE-2(1)(2), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 406/SRT/2023[2016-17]Status: HeardITAT Surat17 Aug 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Sainiआ.अ.सं./Ita No.406/Srt/2023 (A.Y. 2016-17) (Hearing In Physical Court) Vama Infra Deputy Commissioner Of Income Ground Floor Veronaa Tax, Circle-2(1)(2), Aayakar Vs Residency, Harikrishna Bhawan, Majura Gate, Surat- Campus Vraj Chowk, Surat- 395001 395001 Pan : Aakfv 3593 K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent

Section 144Section 250(6)Section 254(1)

disallowing closing stock for verification of Rs.2,34,48,560/- (20% of total closing stock). 4. On the fats and in circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) has erred in confirming the action of Assessing Officer in making addition on account of unexplained expenditure of Rs.1

SHRI VIJAY CHAMPAK PATEL,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(4), SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 281/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat09 Oct 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.281/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2011-12) Vijay Champak Patel, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Pachhlu Faliyu, Near Water Ward-6(4), Surat Tank, Bharthana, Vesu, Surat

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah - CAFor Respondent: Shri O P Meena – Sr. DR
Section 139Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 54ESection 54F

5. The assessee also claimed deduction under section 54F of the Act, at Rs.52,04,000/-against the long term capital gain earned by him. The Assessing Officer examined the veracity of the claim of deduction under section 54F of the Act and observed that assessee had deposited the amount of Rs.54,04,000/- in Bank of Baroda, Capital Gains

LEXUS SOFTMAC,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE1(1)(1), SURAT

In the result, assessee’s appeal ITA No

ITA 702/SRT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.702 & 703/Srt/2024 Ays: (2014-15 &2015-16) (Hybrid Hearing) Lexus Softmac, Deputy Commissioner Of F -3 To F-6, Gujarat Hira Bourse, Income-Tax, Circle 1(1)(1), बनाम/ Gems & Jewellery Park, Surat Room No.108, Vs. Ichchhapore, Aayakar Bhawan, Majura Surat - 394510 Gate, Opp. New Civil Hospital, Surat-395 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aabfl 0495 P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से /Appellant By Shri Deven K Kapadia, C.A. राज" की ओर से /Respondent By Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 19/08/2025 उद्घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 25/09/2025

Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 69C

section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’) both dated 20.05.2024 by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi/ Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short, ‘CIT(A)’] for the assessment years (AYs) 2014-15 and 2015-16, which in turn arose out of separate assessment orders passed by the Assessing Officer (in short

LEXUS SOFTMAC,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 1(1)(1), SURAT

In the result, assessee’s appeal ITA No

ITA 703/SRT/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.702 & 703/Srt/2024 Ays: (2014-15 &2015-16) (Hybrid Hearing) Lexus Softmac, Deputy Commissioner Of F -3 To F-6, Gujarat Hira Bourse, Income-Tax, Circle 1(1)(1), बनाम/ Gems & Jewellery Park, Surat Room No.108, Vs. Ichchhapore, Aayakar Bhawan, Majura Surat - 394510 Gate, Opp. New Civil Hospital, Surat-395 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aabfl 0495 P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से /Appellant By Shri Deven K Kapadia, C.A. राज" की ओर से /Respondent By Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 19/08/2025 उद्घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 25/09/2025

Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 69C

section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’) both dated 20.05.2024 by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi/ Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short, ‘CIT(A)’] for the assessment years (AYs) 2014-15 and 2015-16, which in turn arose out of separate assessment orders passed by the Assessing Officer (in short

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-9,, SURAT vs. M/S. ANJANA EXPORTS,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of Revenue for AY

ITA 2833/AHD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 May 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं././././I.T.A Nos.1879,1872/Ahd/2013 & 2833/Ahd/2014 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10 1. Assistant Commissioner Of Income V. M/S. Anjana Exports, Tax, Circle-9, Surat. 1, Kohinoor Society, Opp. G K Chambers, Varachha Road, Surat- 395 006. [Pan: Aadfa 0943 R] V. 2. M/S. Anjana Exports, Assistant Commissioner 1, Kohinoor Society, Opp. G K Of Income Tax, Circle-9, Chambers, Varachha Road, Surat. Surat- 395 006. [Pan: Aadfa 0943 R] V. 3. Assistant Commissioner Of Income M/S. Anjana Exports, Tax, Circle-9, Surat. 1, Kohinoor Society, Opp. G K Chambers, Varachha Road, Surat- 395 006. [Pan: Aadfa 0943 R] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रतीकीओरसे /Assessee By Shri Mehul Shah, Ca राज"कीओरसे /Revenue By Shri Srinivas T. Bidari, Cit(D.R.) सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 11-02-2020 उद्घोषणाकीतारीख/Pronouncement On: 04-05-2020 आदेश /O R D E R Per O.P.Meena, Am: 1. The Above Two Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-V, Surat [In Short “The Cit(A)”] Dated 18-04-2013 & 01-08-2014 For The Ay. 2009-10 Respectively & One Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-V, Surat [In Short “The Cit(A)”] Dated 18-04-2013 For The Ay. 2009-10. Anjana Exports V. Acit, Circle-9, Surat/Ita. 1879 & 1872/Ahd/2013/Ay.2009-10 & 2833/Ahd/2014/Srt/2017/A.Y.2009-10 Page 2 Of 19 In Ita No.1879/Ahd/2013/Ay.2009-10 By The Revenue:- 2. Ground No. 1& 2 Relates To Deleting The Addition Of Rs.5,58,41,797/-

Section 145(3)

section 45(3) of the Act are not applicable. The CIT(A) has also supported his view by placing reliance on the decision of ITAT, Mumbai Bench in the case of Voltas International Ltd. (2009) 126 TTJ 702 (Mum), Badridas Gauridu (P) Ltd. (2004) 187 CTR 453/ (2003) 261 ITR 256 (Bom.). Hence, considering the foreign exchange contract entered

M/S. ANJANA EXPORTS,,SURAT vs. THE DCIT, CENT. CIRCLE, 9,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of Revenue for AY

ITA 1872/AHD/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 May 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं././././I.T.A Nos.1879,1872/Ahd/2013 & 2833/Ahd/2014 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10 1. Assistant Commissioner Of Income V. M/S. Anjana Exports, Tax, Circle-9, Surat. 1, Kohinoor Society, Opp. G K Chambers, Varachha Road, Surat- 395 006. [Pan: Aadfa 0943 R] V. 2. M/S. Anjana Exports, Assistant Commissioner 1, Kohinoor Society, Opp. G K Of Income Tax, Circle-9, Chambers, Varachha Road, Surat. Surat- 395 006. [Pan: Aadfa 0943 R] V. 3. Assistant Commissioner Of Income M/S. Anjana Exports, Tax, Circle-9, Surat. 1, Kohinoor Society, Opp. G K Chambers, Varachha Road, Surat- 395 006. [Pan: Aadfa 0943 R] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रतीकीओरसे /Assessee By Shri Mehul Shah, Ca राज"कीओरसे /Revenue By Shri Srinivas T. Bidari, Cit(D.R.) सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 11-02-2020 उद्घोषणाकीतारीख/Pronouncement On: 04-05-2020 आदेश /O R D E R Per O.P.Meena, Am: 1. The Above Two Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-V, Surat [In Short “The Cit(A)”] Dated 18-04-2013 & 01-08-2014 For The Ay. 2009-10 Respectively & One Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-V, Surat [In Short “The Cit(A)”] Dated 18-04-2013 For The Ay. 2009-10. Anjana Exports V. Acit, Circle-9, Surat/Ita. 1879 & 1872/Ahd/2013/Ay.2009-10 & 2833/Ahd/2014/Srt/2017/A.Y.2009-10 Page 2 Of 19 In Ita No.1879/Ahd/2013/Ay.2009-10 By The Revenue:- 2. Ground No. 1& 2 Relates To Deleting The Addition Of Rs.5,58,41,797/-

Section 145(3)

section 45(3) of the Act are not applicable. The CIT(A) has also supported his view by placing reliance on the decision of ITAT, Mumbai Bench in the case of Voltas International Ltd. (2009) 126 TTJ 702 (Mum), Badridas Gauridu (P) Ltd. (2004) 187 CTR 453/ (2003) 261 ITR 256 (Bom.). Hence, considering the foreign exchange contract entered

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-9,, SURAT vs. M/S. ANJANA EXPORTS,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of Revenue for AY

ITA 1879/AHD/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 May 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं././././I.T.A Nos.1879,1872/Ahd/2013 & 2833/Ahd/2014 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10 1. Assistant Commissioner Of Income V. M/S. Anjana Exports, Tax, Circle-9, Surat. 1, Kohinoor Society, Opp. G K Chambers, Varachha Road, Surat- 395 006. [Pan: Aadfa 0943 R] V. 2. M/S. Anjana Exports, Assistant Commissioner 1, Kohinoor Society, Opp. G K Of Income Tax, Circle-9, Chambers, Varachha Road, Surat. Surat- 395 006. [Pan: Aadfa 0943 R] V. 3. Assistant Commissioner Of Income M/S. Anjana Exports, Tax, Circle-9, Surat. 1, Kohinoor Society, Opp. G K Chambers, Varachha Road, Surat- 395 006. [Pan: Aadfa 0943 R] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रतीकीओरसे /Assessee By Shri Mehul Shah, Ca राज"कीओरसे /Revenue By Shri Srinivas T. Bidari, Cit(D.R.) सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 11-02-2020 उद्घोषणाकीतारीख/Pronouncement On: 04-05-2020 आदेश /O R D E R Per O.P.Meena, Am: 1. The Above Two Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-V, Surat [In Short “The Cit(A)”] Dated 18-04-2013 & 01-08-2014 For The Ay. 2009-10 Respectively & One Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-V, Surat [In Short “The Cit(A)”] Dated 18-04-2013 For The Ay. 2009-10. Anjana Exports V. Acit, Circle-9, Surat/Ita. 1879 & 1872/Ahd/2013/Ay.2009-10 & 2833/Ahd/2014/Srt/2017/A.Y.2009-10 Page 2 Of 19 In Ita No.1879/Ahd/2013/Ay.2009-10 By The Revenue:- 2. Ground No. 1& 2 Relates To Deleting The Addition Of Rs.5,58,41,797/-

Section 145(3)

section 45(3) of the Act are not applicable. The CIT(A) has also supported his view by placing reliance on the decision of ITAT, Mumbai Bench in the case of Voltas International Ltd. (2009) 126 TTJ 702 (Mum), Badridas Gauridu (P) Ltd. (2004) 187 CTR 453/ (2003) 261 ITR 256 (Bom.). Hence, considering the foreign exchange contract entered

SANTOSH SINGH HUKAM SINGH KARNAWAT,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2(3)(8), SURAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 655/SRT/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. DR
Section 133(6)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is bad with regards to the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in levying penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on addition made of 5% of total purchase value to the tune of Rs. 43,83,431/- from

AALIDHRA TEXFAB PRIVATE LIMITED,SURAT vs. CPC CURRENT JURISDICTION- DCIT,CIRCLE 1(1)(1),SURAT, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 153/SRT/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Surat19 Aug 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.153/Srt/2025 Assessment Year: (2023-24) (Hybrid Hearing) Aalidhara Texfab Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Cpc, 2, Functional Estate, New Industrial Current Jurisdiction: Estate, Road No.6, Udhna, Surat – Dcit, Circle – 1(1)(1), 394210, Gujarat Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aasca8215E (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca Respondent By Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 02/07/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 19/08/2025

Section 115BSection 143(1)Section 250

250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’), dated 31.12.2024, by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeal), Addl/JCIT(A) - 9, Mumbai [in short ‘CIT(A)’] for the Assessment Year (AY) 2023-24. 2. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as under: “1. On the facts and circumstances of the case as well

VARNIRAJ TAXTILES,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2)(5), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 461/SRT/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat19 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Virtual Hearing) Varniraj Textiles, I.T.O., M-31, Bombay Market, Umarwada, Ward-1(2)(5), Vs. Surat-395010. Surat. Pan No. Aaifv 0327 P Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 250(6)Section 254(1)Section 40Section 40A(3)

5), Vs. Surat-395010. Surat. PAN No. AAIFV 0327 P Appellant/ assessee Respondent/ revenue Assessee represented by Shri Hiren Vepari, C.A. Department represented by Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr.DR Date of Institution of Appeal 07/07/2023 Date of hearing 19/09/2023 Date of pronouncement 19/09/2023 Order under Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal

HAMILTON HOUSEWARES PRIVATE LIMITED,DAMAN & DIU vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VALSAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 163/SRT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat31 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.163/Srt/2022 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Virtual Hearing) Hamilton Houseware Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Pcit, Valsad. Plot No.49/50, Danydyog Industrial Estate, Piparia 396230, Dadra & Nagar Haveli. (Appellant) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aabcd1683Q

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 263Section 35Section 80GSection 80I

250 TAXMAN 0270 wherein the Hon’ble high held as under: “5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the orders on record, we are broadly in agreement with the view of the Tribunal. Undisputedly, the research and development facility set up by the assessee was approved by the prescribed authority and necessary approval was granted