Search: disallowance

17 results for “disallowance”+ Section 245D(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai180 Delhi38 Kolkata22 Chennai19 Surat17 Allahabad16 Chandigarh15 Jaipur12 Indore12 Pune11 Bangalore6 Agra5 Visakhapatnam5 Lucknow2 Rajkot2 Hyderabad2 Varanasi2 SC2 Raipur2 Ahmedabad1 Cochin1 Karnataka1 Telangana1

Key Topics

Survey u/s 133A17 Condonation of Delay17 Addition to Income10 Section 143(3)7 Section 245H7 Section 245D(4)7

M D INDUSTRIES PVT LTD,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -1, SURAT

In the result, Eight appeals of the Assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 502/SRT/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 Dec 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No’S.497 To 503 & 527/Srt/2019 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 1999-2000 To 2005-06 & 2000-01 M/S.M.D.Industries Pvt. Ltd., V Deputy Commissioner Of B-5, Rangnagar Society, S Income Tax, Circle-1, Surat. Lambe Hanuman Road, Surat. . [Pan: Aabcm 6026 G] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Shri Vijay Mehta – Ca & Mrs. Sneha M.Padhiar – Ca राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By Shri O.P.Singh – Cit-Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 04.12.2019 उ"घोषणाक"तार"ख/Pronouncement On: 06.12.2019 आदेश /O R D E R Per Sandeep Gosain, Jm: 1. This Eight Appeals By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-1, Surat Dated 06.09.2007 & 28.10.2009 For The Assessment Years 1999- 2000 To 2005-06 & 2000-01 Respectively.

Section 143(3)Section 245D(4)Section 245H

245D(4)of the Act. 11. 23-12-2013: The order was passed by CIT(A) - V for AY 2003-04, dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction. The appeal was dismissed in limine by the learned CIT(A). A legal opinion was sought from the representative, Advocate Hemant Jadia who was handling the case in Settlement Commission as well

M D INDUSTRIES PVT LTD,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -1, SURAT

M D INDUSTRIES PVT LTD,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -1, SURAT

M D INDUSTRIES PVT LTD,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -1, SURAT

M D INDUSTRIES PVT LTD,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -1, SURAT

M D INDUSTRIES PVT LTD,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -1, SURAT

M D INDUSTRIES PVT LTD,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -1, SURAT

M D INDUSTRIES PVT LTD,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -1, SURAT

M D INDUSTRIES PVT LTD,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -1, SURAT

SHRI MOHANBHAI D. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-9(3),, SURAT

M/S. LAKHANI IMPEX,,SURAT vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4,, SURAT

M/S. LAKHANI IMPEX,,SURAT vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4,, SURAT

M/S. SAMARTH INDIA,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, OSD-1, RANGE-2,, SURAT

SHREYANSH CORPORATION,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, OSD-1, RANGE-2,, SURAT

SHRI MOHANBHAI D. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-9(3),, SURAT

M/S. SAMARTH INDIA,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, OSD-1, RANGE-2,, SURAT

SHREYANSH CORPORATION,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, OSD-1, RANGE-2,, SURAT

SHRI MOHANBHAI D. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-9(3),, SURAT

M/S. SHREYA IMPEX,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2),, SURAT