THE ADDL.CIT., BHARUCH RANGE,, BHARUCH vs. M/S. BARODA GUJARAT GRAMIN BANK,, BHARUCH

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue for A

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri O. P. Meena

disallowed the claim of deduction of revenue expenditure amounting to Rs. 79, 64, 580 in respect of the core banking solutions implementation. These facts have been discussed by the AO at page number 2 to 5 of the assessment order. The AO was of the opinion that expenses of CBS have resulted in the benefit of enduring nature and therefore

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, BHARUCH vs. BARODA GUJARAT GRAMIN BANK, BHARUCH

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue for A

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri O. P. Meena

disallowed the claim of deduction of revenue expenditure amounting to Rs. 79, 64, 580 in respect of the core banking solutions implementation. These facts have been discussed by the AO at page number 2 to 5 of the assessment order. The AO was of the opinion that expenses of CBS have resulted in the benefit of enduring nature and therefore

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BHARUCH vs. BARODA GUJARAT GRAMIN BANK, BHARUCH

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue for A

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri O. P. Meena

disallowed the claim of deduction of revenue expenditure amounting to Rs. 79, 64, 580 in respect of the core banking solutions implementation. These facts have been discussed by the AO at page number 2 to 5 of the assessment order. The AO was of the opinion that expenses of CBS have resulted in the benefit of enduring nature and therefore

SHRIFAL IMPEX PVT. LTD.,,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1)(3), SURAT

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.190 To 191/Srt/2023 Assessment Year: (2011-12 To 2012-13) (Physical Hearing) Shrifal Impex Private Limited, Vs. The Ito, No.504, 5Th Floor, H. No.6/B/1739- Ward-2(1)(3), 1380, Parshwa Complex Thoba Sheri, Surat Mahidharpura, Surat – 395003. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaocs4409E (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.250/Srt/2023 Assessment Year: (2014-15) Shrifal Impex Private Limited, Vs. The Ito, No.504, 5Th Floor, H. No.6/B/1739- Ward-2(1)(3), 1380, Parshwa Complex Thoba Sheri, Surat Mahidharpura, Surat – 395003. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaocs4409E (Appellant) (Respondent)

section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”). ITA Nos. 190 - 191 &250/SRT/2023 Shrifal Impex Pvt. Ltd. 2. Since, the issues involved in all the appeals are common and identical; therefore, these appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order. For the sake of convenience

SHRIFAL IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1)(3), SURAT

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.190 To 191/Srt/2023 Assessment Year: (2011-12 To 2012-13) (Physical Hearing) Shrifal Impex Private Limited, Vs. The Ito, No.504, 5Th Floor, H. No.6/B/1739- Ward-2(1)(3), 1380, Parshwa Complex Thoba Sheri, Surat Mahidharpura, Surat – 395003. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaocs4409E (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.250/Srt/2023 Assessment Year: (2014-15) Shrifal Impex Private Limited, Vs. The Ito, No.504, 5Th Floor, H. No.6/B/1739- Ward-2(1)(3), 1380, Parshwa Complex Thoba Sheri, Surat Mahidharpura, Surat – 395003. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaocs4409E (Appellant) (Respondent)

section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”). ITA Nos. 190 - 191 &250/SRT/2023 Shrifal Impex Pvt. Ltd. 2. Since, the issues involved in all the appeals are common and identical; therefore, these appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order. For the sake of convenience

SHRIFAL IMPEX PVT. LTD.,,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1)(3), SURAT

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.190 To 191/Srt/2023 Assessment Year: (2011-12 To 2012-13) (Physical Hearing) Shrifal Impex Private Limited, Vs. The Ito, No.504, 5Th Floor, H. No.6/B/1739- Ward-2(1)(3), 1380, Parshwa Complex Thoba Sheri, Surat Mahidharpura, Surat – 395003. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaocs4409E (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.250/Srt/2023 Assessment Year: (2014-15) Shrifal Impex Private Limited, Vs. The Ito, No.504, 5Th Floor, H. No.6/B/1739- Ward-2(1)(3), 1380, Parshwa Complex Thoba Sheri, Surat Mahidharpura, Surat – 395003. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaocs4409E (Appellant) (Respondent)

section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”). ITA Nos. 190 - 191 &250/SRT/2023 Shrifal Impex Pvt. Ltd. 2. Since, the issues involved in all the appeals are common and identical; therefore, these appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order. For the sake of convenience

LATE MANISHBHAI NAGINDAS GAJJAR,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(3),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for in ITA

Bench: Shri C.M.Garg & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.1335/Ahd/2016 िनधा"रण वष"/A.Y.:2011-12 Late Manishbhai Nagindas Gajjar Vs. Income Tax Officer, Through L/H Illaben Manishbhai Ward- 6(3) Surat Gajjar, 316Kh Luhar Mohhallo , Palgam, Chaurasi Surat 359009 Pan: Aovpg 1860K अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

disallowed the claim of deduction under section 54B on the ground that investment in land was made on 03.07.2010 prior to sale of old assets on 20.08.2010. The CIT (A) has also confirmed the same. 16. Being, aggrieved the assessee filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted the Revenue’s contention is that

KALUBHAI DULABHAI GOLAVIYA,SURAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, , SURAT

In the result, ground raised by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपीलसं./It(Ss)A No.15 & Ita No.619/Srt/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2011-12 &2014-15) (Virtual Court Hearing) Shri Kalubhai Dulabhai Golaviya Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, B/1-2, Jalaram Society, B/H. Central Circle-2, Aaykar Bhavan, Vs. Gurunagar Society, Varachha Majura Gate, Surat-395001 Road, Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Ablpp 5116 A (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent)

disallowance of deduction under section 54F of the Act. Since, we have allowed ground no.1 of the assessee, holding the assessee`s transaction falls under the head capital gain, therefore assessee is entitled to claim the deduction under section 54F of the Act. We note that assessee had claimed the deduction of Rs.31,33,611/- on account of investment

VIRENDRA MANAKCHAND BEGANI (HUF),SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1(3)(4), SURAT

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Physical Court) Virendra Manakchand Begani (Huf), I.T.O., 3-B, Shubh Laxmi Appt., City Light Ward-1(3)(4), Vs. Road, Surat-395007, Surat. Surat. Pan No. Aaihv 4669 N Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Surat (in short, the ld. CIT(A) dated 05/02/2020 for the Assessment year (AY) 2015-16. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: “1. On the facts

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, SURAT vs. M/S. KEJRIWAL INDUSTRIES LTD.,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena

disallowance of PF and ESIC of Rs.23,20,130/- and addition of Rs.12,89,25,938/- u/s.68 of the Act. However, the addition made u/s.68 was left out to be added in computation of income hence, same was later added by the AO vide order u/s.154 dated 09.04.2014 of the Act. The AO noticed that the assessee has taken total

SALONI ENGINEERING WORKS,VAPI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-8, VAPI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee, are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपीलसं./Ita Nos.237/Srt/2021 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19) (Virtual Court Hearing) Vyashkumar Indralal Mishra Income Tax Officer, Dilu Falia, House Of Shri Ward-9, Nr. Vaishali Char Rasta, Nh- Vs. R.C.Patel, Vaghdhara Road, 8, Gidc, Vapi-396195 Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Silvassa-396230 (Ut) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Amlpm 3623 N (Appellant ) (Respondent)

220, Income Tax Office, GIDC, Vapi-396195 Nr. Vaishali Char Rasta, NH-8, Vs. GIDC, Vapi-396195 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: ABVFS4912 K (Appellant ) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Lokesh Khadaria, CA. Respondent by : Shri Shaurya Shaswat Shukla– Sr.DR सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of Hearing : 25/07/2022 घोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 29/07/2022 आदेश

VYASHKUMAR INDRALAL MISHRA,SILVASSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 7, VAPI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee, are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपीलसं./Ita Nos.237/Srt/2021 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19) (Virtual Court Hearing) Vyashkumar Indralal Mishra Income Tax Officer, Dilu Falia, House Of Shri Ward-9, Nr. Vaishali Char Rasta, Nh- Vs. R.C.Patel, Vaghdhara Road, 8, Gidc, Vapi-396195 Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Silvassa-396230 (Ut) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Amlpm 3623 N (Appellant ) (Respondent)

220, Income Tax Office, GIDC, Vapi-396195 Nr. Vaishali Char Rasta, NH-8, Vs. GIDC, Vapi-396195 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: ABVFS4912 K (Appellant ) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Lokesh Khadaria, CA. Respondent by : Shri Shaurya Shaswat Shukla– Sr.DR सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of Hearing : 25/07/2022 घोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 29/07/2022 आदेश

KUNDANBEN MAHESHCHANDRA GOR,UMBERGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, VAPI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.728/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2015-16) (Hybrid Hearing) Kundanben Maheshchandra Gor, Vs. The Ito, Plot No 1502, 3Rd Phase, Ward-5, Gidc, Umbergaon - 396195 Vapi "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Awkpg6190P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) Appellant By Shri Chetan Khakhkhar, Ar Respondent By Shri Mukesh Jain, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 20/03/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 29/05/2025

section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’), dated 30.04.2024 by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [in short ‘CIT(A)’] for the Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16. 2. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as under: “1. On the facts and circumstances of the case as well

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3, VALSAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Dr. A. L. Sainiआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.146/Srt/2023 Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Virtual Hearing) Raj Kishore Prasad, Vs. The Ito, 201, 2Nd Floor, Devashish Complex, Ward-3, Nr. Regenta Central Antarim Hotel, Valsad Off Cg Road, Ahmedabad "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aitpp0535A (Assessee) (Respondent)

disallowed and added to the total income of the assessee. I am satisfied that assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars of his income and therefore penal proceedings are initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act separately.” 9. The ld Counsel pointed out that during the penalty proceedings, under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, the assessing officer

THE ITO, WARD - 3(2)(2),, SURAT vs. SHRI POPATBHAI RANCHHODBHAI BHADANI,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue as well as Cross

Bench: Shri C.M.Garg & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.585/Ahd/2016/Srt & Co. No. 63/Ahd/2016/Srt िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year :2011-12 1. Income Tax Officer, Vs 1. Shri Popatbhai Ranchhodbhai Ward- 3(2)(2) Surat Bhadani, House No.12, Bhumi Row House, Ved Road Surat 395008 Pan:Adspb6681R Vs 2. Shri Popatbhai Ranchhodbhai 2.Income Tax Officer, Bhadani, Ward- 3(2)(2) Surat House No.12, Bhumi Row House, Ved Road Surat 395008 Pan:Adspb6681R अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

220, which worked out to Rs. 4,80,217. 18. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the ld. CIT (A). Ld. CIT (A) observed that by disallowance of expenses of Rs. 4,80,217 the net profit arrived at 3.39% which is at comparable with preceding year at 3.21% and disallowance were made after rejection of books

LATE SHRI BHIMSEN DARBARILAL ARORA,,SURAT vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5,, SURAT

In the result, ground no.4 raised by assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1706/Ahd/2016 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: (2010-11) (Physical Court Hearing) Bhimsen Darbarilal Arora Through, Vs. The Acit, Circle-5, L/H. Rajat Bhimsen Arora, Surat. Smt. Mamta Bhimsen Arora, A-201, Madhulika Apartment, Bhatar Road, Surat. (Appellant) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Acaps9230L

220 (Mad.) ; (iv) The material or information found in the course of survey proceeding could not be a basis for making any addition in the block assessment, vide decision of this court in T. C (A) No. 2620 of 2006 (between CIT v. S. Ajit Kumar [2008] 300ITR 152 (Mad.); (v) Finally, the word "may" used in section 133A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIR.1(1)(1),, SURAT vs. ENVIRO CONTROL PVT. LTD.,, SURAT

In the result, all the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Virtual Hearing) A.C.I.T., Enviro Control Pvt. Ltd., Circle-1(1)(1), Enviro House, Opp. Bank Of Vs. Surat. Maharashtra, Ghod Dod Road, Surat-395007. Pan No. Aaace 8700 C Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

2) and 142(1) of the Act proceeded for reassessment. During reassessment, the Assessing Officer recorded that he has seen from the list provided by Maharashtra VAT Department that the assessee is a beneficiary of bogus bills aggregating of Rs. 7.99 crores from such hawala dealers. The Assessing Officer also recorded the modus operandi of Hawala dealers and issued show

M/S. DHARAM IMPEX,,SURAT vs. THE DY. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2008-09 in ITA No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपीलसं./It(Ss)A Nos.288 To 293/Ahd/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2009-10 To 2014-15) (Physical Court Hearing) M/S Kangan Jewels Pvt. Ltd. Deputy Commissioner Of C/O 106, Saryu Chambers, Income-Tax, Central Circle-4, Vs. Jadakhadi Mahidharpura, Surat- Surat 395003. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadck 2552 R अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent आयकर अपीलसं./It(Ss)A Nos.306 To 311/Ahd/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2008-09 To 2013-14) आयकर अपीलसं./Ita Nos.1579/Ahd/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2014-15) M/S Maniprabha Impex Pvt.Ltd. Deputy Commissioner Of C/O 106, Saryu Chambers, Income-Tax, Central Circle-4, Vs. Jadakhadi Mahidharpura, Surat- Surat 395003. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaecm 6219 L अपीलाथ" /Appellant) ""यथ" /Respondent) आयकर अपीलसं./It(Ss)A Nos.312 To 317/Ahd/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2008-09 To 2013-14) आयकर अपीलसं./Ita Nos.1580/Ahd/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2014-15) M/S Dharam Impex Deputy Commissioner Of C/O 106, Saryu Chambers, Income-Tax, Central Circle-4, Vs. Jadakhadi Mahidharpura, Surat- Surat 395003. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaffd 2692 C अपीलाथ" /Appellant) ""यथ" /Respondent)

disallowance of genuine expenditure and allowed only 25% of commission income as expenditure on ad-hoc basis. 7. Appellant craves liberty to add, further grounds or to amend or alter the existing grounds of appeal on or before the date of hearing.” 4. The assessee has also raised additional grounds of appeal under Rule 27 of the Income Tax Appellate