BALUBHAI MUSTUFABHAI MAHIDA,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(2), SURAT

In the result, this ground of appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Physical Hearing) Balubhai Mustufabhai Mahida, D.C.I.T., Post Valak, Valak Kamrej, Circle-2(2), Vs. Surat-394180 Surat. Pan No. Bkdpm 8643 R Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

disallowance of deduction 11 Balubhai Mustufabhai Mahida Vs DCIT under Section 54B is incorrect. The Assessing Officer failed to examine the crucial criteria. The ld. CIT(A) also held that in his opinion, the assessee failed to establish that the land was used for agricultural purposes for two years immediately preceeding the date of sale and confirmed the action

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VAPI CIRCLE,, VAPI vs. M/S. MITSU LIMITED,, DAMAN

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sandip Gosain & Shri O. P. Meenav. ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं././././I "नधा"र अपीलाथ" Appellant S .T.A No. ण N वष"/A Y: 1 1671/Ah 2002- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant D/2006 03 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 2 1371/Ah 2002- Assistant V. M/S. Mitsu Limited, D/2006 03 Commissioner Of 304/2, Iind Phase, Income Tax-Vapi Gidc, Vapi 396195 Circle, Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Co.No.1 2002- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant 3 84/Ahd/ 03 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of 2006 Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 4 1672/Ah 2003- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant D/2006 04 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 5 1764/Ah 2003- Assistant V. M/S. Mitsu Limited, D/2006 04 Commissioner Of 304/2, Iind Phase, Income Tax-Vapi Gidc, Vapi 396195 Circle, Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q 6 1000/Ah 2002- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant D/2016 03 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 7 3510/Ah 2000- Assistant V. M/S. Mitsu Limited, D/2016 01 Commissioner Of Page 2 Of 83 Mitsu Ltd. V. Acit- Vapi/I.T.A. No.1671-1371,Co-184,1672-1764,1614 &1000/Ahd/2006/A.Y.02-03,03-04,06-07.02-03 Income Tax-Vapi 304/2, Iind Phase, Circle, Vapi Gidc, Vapi 396195 Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q

section 143 (3)/ 143(3)/263 of Income Tax Act,1961 (in short ‘the Act’) by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-Vapi Circle, Vapi (referred as the AO). These appeal were by the assessee as well as Revenue for the and Cross Objection by the assessee for assessment year

M/S. MITSU PRIVATE LIMITED,,VAPI vs. THE ACIT, VAPI CIRCLE,, VAPI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sandip Gosain & Shri O. P. Meenav. ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं././././I "नधा"र अपीलाथ" Appellant S .T.A No. ण N वष"/A Y: 1 1671/Ah 2002- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant D/2006 03 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 2 1371/Ah 2002- Assistant V. M/S. Mitsu Limited, D/2006 03 Commissioner Of 304/2, Iind Phase, Income Tax-Vapi Gidc, Vapi 396195 Circle, Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Co.No.1 2002- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant 3 84/Ahd/ 03 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of 2006 Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 4 1672/Ah 2003- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant D/2006 04 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 5 1764/Ah 2003- Assistant V. M/S. Mitsu Limited, D/2006 04 Commissioner Of 304/2, Iind Phase, Income Tax-Vapi Gidc, Vapi 396195 Circle, Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q 6 1000/Ah 2002- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant D/2016 03 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 7 3510/Ah 2000- Assistant V. M/S. Mitsu Limited, D/2016 01 Commissioner Of Page 2 Of 83 Mitsu Ltd. V. Acit- Vapi/I.T.A. No.1671-1371,Co-184,1672-1764,1614 &1000/Ahd/2006/A.Y.02-03,03-04,06-07.02-03 Income Tax-Vapi 304/2, Iind Phase, Circle, Vapi Gidc, Vapi 396195 Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q

section 143 (3)/ 143(3)/263 of Income Tax Act,1961 (in short ‘the Act’) by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-Vapi Circle, Vapi (referred as the AO). These appeal were by the assessee as well as Revenue for the and Cross Objection by the assessee for assessment year

GUJARAT NARMADA VALLEY FERTILIZERS & CHEMICALS LTD,SURAT vs. PR. CIT-3, VADODARA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.178/Srt/2020 Assessment Year: (2014-15) (Virtual Court Hearing) Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Vs. The Pcit-3 & Chemicals Ltd., Surat. Narmada House, Narmadanagar, Bharuch – 392015. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaacg8372Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Yogesh Shah, Ar Respondent By Shri Ashok B. Koli, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 03/01/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 22/02/2023

disallowance u/s 14A was required to be made and erred in setting aside to AO for re-verification. It is submitted that it be so held now. 2. The learned CIT has erred in not appreciating that the investments in securities yielding tax free income were made from own funds and Rule 8D was not applicable to the appellant

SHRI VIJAY CHAMPAK PATEL,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(4), SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.281/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2011-12) Vijay Champak Patel, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Pachhlu Faliyu, Near Water Ward-6(4), Surat Tank, Bharthana, Vesu, Surat

215/-. The assessment Vijay Champak Patel Assessment Year: 2011-12 proceedings under provisions of section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was completed on 07/03/2014 and the total income of the assessee for the period under consideration was assessed to be Rs.1,55,53,210/-. The assessee claimed deductions under section 54EC of the Act and under section

HAMILTON HOUSEWARES PRIVATE LIMITED,DAMAN & DIU vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VALSAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.163/Srt/2022 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Virtual Hearing) Hamilton Houseware Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Pcit, Valsad. Plot No.49/50, Danydyog Industrial Estate, Piparia 396230, Dadra & Nagar Haveli. (Appellant) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aabcd1683Q

disallowable expenditure after considering the financial ITA 163/SRT/2022/AY.2017-18 Hamilton Housewares Pvt. Ltd. documents and other relevant details/submissions filed by the assessee and as available on record with a view to ensure that there is no discrepancy in the facts and figures on record." One of the main grounds which appealed to the Commissioner was that the prescribed authority

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, SURAT vs. M/S. J.K. PAPER LTD.,, SURAT

In the result this ground of appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble(Virtual Hearing) आ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.365/Srt/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S J. K. Paper Ltd., Income Tax, Circle-1(1)(2), P.O. Central Pulp Mills, Surat. Fort Songadh – 394660. Dist. Tapi, Gujarat. [Pan: Aaact 6305 N] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""थ"/Respondent

215/- the IT Act on opening stock 4. Unexplained Creditors Rs.9,70,460/- Deleted/allowed Rs.12,58,580/- 5. Excess process stock Deleted/allowed declared to bank 6. Disallowance u/s. 14A of Rs.21,34,390/- Deleted/allowed the I.T.Act 7. Disallowance on account of Rs.18,60,000/- Deleted/allowed commission on sales Rs.1,88,35,000/- 8. Disallowance on account of Deleted/allowed other expenses

R.S. TRADELINK PVT.LTD.,SURAT vs. THE ACIT.,CIRCLE-4,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.2130/Ahd/2014 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2008-09) (Virtual Court Hearing) M/S. R.S. Tradelink Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Plot No.17, Magdalla Port Road, Of Income Tax, Circle-4, Surat. Magdalla, Surat-395007. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aabcr6607A (Assessee) (Respondent)

disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. Thus, the Assessing Officer has imposed penalty on the ground of furnishing inaccurate particulars, whereas the Tribunal has upheld. the order of the Assessing Officer on the ground of concealment of particulars. It is by now well settled that while issuing a notice under section

KALUBHAI DULABHAI GOLAVIYA,SURAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, , SURAT

In the result, ground raised by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपीलसं./It(Ss)A No.15 & Ita No.619/Srt/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2011-12 &2014-15) (Virtual Court Hearing) Shri Kalubhai Dulabhai Golaviya Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, B/1-2, Jalaram Society, B/H. Central Circle-2, Aaykar Bhavan, Vs. Gurunagar Society, Varachha Majura Gate, Surat-395001 Road, Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Ablpp 5116 A (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent)

disallowance of deduction under section 54F of the Act. Since, we have allowed ground no.1 of the assessee, holding the assessee`s transaction falls under the head capital gain, therefore assessee is entitled to claim the deduction under section 54F of the Act. We note that assessee had claimed the deduction of Rs.31,33,611/- on account of investment

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VAPI vs. GUJARAT POLYSOL CHEMICALS LIMITED, VAPI

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed whereas appeal of Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain & Hon’Ble Shri Om Prakash Kant & & Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. Gujarat Polysol Income Tax Chemicals Limited 9Th Floor, Fortune Square Ii, 1, Plot No. 1734, 3Rd Daman Road, Chala, Vapi Phase, Gidc, Vapi, 396191 Gujarat 396195 Pan/Gir No. Aaacg8908Q (Applicant) (Respondent)

section 133(6) of the Act, wherein all suppliers have confirmed their supplies and Sunil Patel in his affidavit by extracted in a statement during the search proceedings as clarified that he was under pressure and has no experience of working in manufacturing industry and made a statement under misconception of cash discounting on purchase; and no evidence of investment

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VAPI vs. GUJARAT POLYSOL CHEMICALS LIMITED, VAPI

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed whereas appeal of Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain & Hon’Ble Shri Om Prakash Kant & & Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. Gujarat Polysol Income Tax Chemicals Limited 9Th Floor, Fortune Square Ii, 1, Plot No. 1734, 3Rd Daman Road, Chala, Vapi Phase, Gidc, Vapi, 396191 Gujarat 396195 Pan/Gir No. Aaacg8908Q (Applicant) (Respondent)

section 133(6) of the Act, wherein all suppliers have confirmed their supplies and Sunil Patel in his affidavit by extracted in a statement during the search proceedings as clarified that he was under pressure and has no experience of working in manufacturing industry and made a statement under misconception of cash discounting on purchase; and no evidence of investment

DCIT, VAPI vs. GUJARART POLYSOL CHEMICAL LTD, VAPI

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed whereas appeal of Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Sainiआ.अ.सं./Ita No.513 & 595/Srt/2023 (Ay 2018-19) (Hearing In Physical Court) Gujarat Polysol Chemicals Ltd. Assistant Commissioner Of 1, Plot No.1734, 3Rd Phase. Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Vs Gidc, Vapi-396195 Vapi, 8Th Floor, Fortune Square- Pan No. Aaacg 8908 Q Ii, Above Tbz, Chala-396191 अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent /Ita No.595/Srt/2023 (Ay 2018-19) Deputy Commissioner Of Gujarat Polysol Chemicals Ltd., Income Tax, Central Circle, I, Plot No.1734, 3Rd Phase, Gidc, Vs Vapi, 9Th Floor, Fortune Vapi-396195 Pan No.Aaacg 8908 Q Square-Ii, Daman Road, Chala, Vapi-396191 अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent

section 133(6) of the Act, wherein all suppliers have confirmed their supplies and Sunil Patel in his affidavit by extracted in a statement during the search proceedings as clarified that he was under pressure and has no experience of working in manufacturing industry and made a statement under misconception of cash discounting on purchase; and no evidence of investment

GUJARAT POLYSOL CHEMICALS LIMITED LIMITED,VAPI vs. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VAPI, VAPI

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed whereas appeal of Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Sainiआ.अ.सं./Ita No.513 & 595/Srt/2023 (Ay 2018-19) (Hearing In Physical Court) Gujarat Polysol Chemicals Ltd. Assistant Commissioner Of 1, Plot No.1734, 3Rd Phase. Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Vs Gidc, Vapi-396195 Vapi, 8Th Floor, Fortune Square- Pan No. Aaacg 8908 Q Ii, Above Tbz, Chala-396191 अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent /Ita No.595/Srt/2023 (Ay 2018-19) Deputy Commissioner Of Gujarat Polysol Chemicals Ltd., Income Tax, Central Circle, I, Plot No.1734, 3Rd Phase, Gidc, Vs Vapi, 9Th Floor, Fortune Vapi-396195 Pan No.Aaacg 8908 Q Square-Ii, Daman Road, Chala, Vapi-396191 अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent

section 133(6) of the Act, wherein all suppliers have confirmed their supplies and Sunil Patel in his affidavit by extracted in a statement during the search proceedings as clarified that he was under pressure and has no experience of working in manufacturing industry and made a statement under misconception of cash discounting on purchase; and no evidence of investment

SMT. JAYABEN GOVINDJI PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(3),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Virtual Court) Smt. Jayaben Govindji Patil, Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Plot No.2, Gurukrupa Bunglow, Opp. Income Tax, Circle-1(3), Sargam Shopping Center, Near Umra Surat Jakat Naka, Surat – 395001. Pan : Arfp1732Q Appellant Respondednt

disallowing deduction of Rs.15537723/- claimed by the assessee under section 80IB(1Q) of the IT Act. (3) It is therefore prayed that the above addition confirmed by learned Commissioner of income tax (Appeals) may be deleted. ITA 238/AHD/2017/AY.2012-13 Jayaben Govindji Patel Brief facts of the case as gathered from the order of lower 2. authorities are that the assessee

SANJAY MAHADEV KHOPKAR,THANE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIR.-3(2), , SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Physical Hearing) Sanjay Mahadev Khopkar, A.C.I.T., C-102, Sanskar Jyot, Gaon Devi Circle-3(2), Vs. Road, More Tower Dombivilli West Surat. Kalyan, Thakurli Thane, Maharastra-421201. Pan No. Agipk 1744 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

disallowed by CPC, Bangalore and on appeal no relief was granted by the ld. CIT(A). However, on further appeal before Tribunal, in various cases, restored the matter back to the file of Assessing Officer to grant credit of the tax which has been deducted from the salary of assessee. The ld. AR submits that similar direction may be given

RAJHANS METALS,,NA vs. ARIVS.THE PR. CIT-1,, VALSAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

disallowance of labour and carting expenses. The books of accounts of the assessee are audited u/s 44AB of the Act and return of income is also supported by audit report in Form No. 3CB & 3CD. In support of the expenses, assessee furnished the bank statement, details of the expenses exceeding Rs. 5 lakhs debited in the trading account and details

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-9,, SURAT vs. M/S. ANJANA EXPORTS,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of Revenue for AY

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं././././I.T.A Nos.1879,1872/Ahd/2013 & 2833/Ahd/2014 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10 1. Assistant Commissioner Of Income V. M/S. Anjana Exports, Tax, Circle-9, Surat. 1, Kohinoor Society, Opp. G K Chambers, Varachha Road, Surat- 395 006. [Pan: Aadfa 0943 R] V. 2. M/S. Anjana Exports, Assistant Commissioner 1, Kohinoor Society, Opp. G K Of Income Tax, Circle-9, Chambers, Varachha Road, Surat. Surat- 395 006. [Pan: Aadfa 0943 R] V. 3. Assistant Commissioner Of Income M/S. Anjana Exports, Tax, Circle-9, Surat. 1, Kohinoor Society, Opp. G K Chambers, Varachha Road, Surat- 395 006. [Pan: Aadfa 0943 R] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रतीकीओरसे /Assessee By Shri Mehul Shah, Ca राज"कीओरसे /Revenue By Shri Srinivas T. Bidari, Cit(D.R.) सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 11-02-2020 उद्घोषणाकीतारीख/Pronouncement On: 04-05-2020 आदेश /O R D E R Per O.P.Meena, Am: 1. The Above Two Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-V, Surat [In Short “The Cit(A)”] Dated 18-04-2013 & 01-08-2014 For The Ay. 2009-10 Respectively & One Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-V, Surat [In Short “The Cit(A)”] Dated 18-04-2013 For The Ay. 2009-10. Anjana Exports V. Acit, Circle-9, Surat/Ita. 1879 & 1872/Ahd/2013/Ay.2009-10 & 2833/Ahd/2014/Srt/2017/A.Y.2009-10 Page 2 Of 19 In Ita No.1879/Ahd/2013/Ay.2009-10 By The Revenue:- 2. Ground No. 1& 2 Relates To Deleting The Addition Of Rs.5,58,41,797/-

section 45(3) of the Act are not applicable. The CIT(A) has also supported his view by placing reliance on the decision of ITAT, Mumbai Bench in the case of Voltas International Ltd. (2009) 126 TTJ 702 (Mum), Badridas Gauridu (P) Ltd. (2004) 187 CTR 453/ (2003) 261 ITR 256 (Bom.). Hence, considering the foreign exchange contract entered

M/S. ANJANA EXPORTS,,SURAT vs. THE DCIT, CENT. CIRCLE, 9,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of Revenue for AY

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं././././I.T.A Nos.1879,1872/Ahd/2013 & 2833/Ahd/2014 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10 1. Assistant Commissioner Of Income V. M/S. Anjana Exports, Tax, Circle-9, Surat. 1, Kohinoor Society, Opp. G K Chambers, Varachha Road, Surat- 395 006. [Pan: Aadfa 0943 R] V. 2. M/S. Anjana Exports, Assistant Commissioner 1, Kohinoor Society, Opp. G K Of Income Tax, Circle-9, Chambers, Varachha Road, Surat. Surat- 395 006. [Pan: Aadfa 0943 R] V. 3. Assistant Commissioner Of Income M/S. Anjana Exports, Tax, Circle-9, Surat. 1, Kohinoor Society, Opp. G K Chambers, Varachha Road, Surat- 395 006. [Pan: Aadfa 0943 R] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रतीकीओरसे /Assessee By Shri Mehul Shah, Ca राज"कीओरसे /Revenue By Shri Srinivas T. Bidari, Cit(D.R.) सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 11-02-2020 उद्घोषणाकीतारीख/Pronouncement On: 04-05-2020 आदेश /O R D E R Per O.P.Meena, Am: 1. The Above Two Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-V, Surat [In Short “The Cit(A)”] Dated 18-04-2013 & 01-08-2014 For The Ay. 2009-10 Respectively & One Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-V, Surat [In Short “The Cit(A)”] Dated 18-04-2013 For The Ay. 2009-10. Anjana Exports V. Acit, Circle-9, Surat/Ita. 1879 & 1872/Ahd/2013/Ay.2009-10 & 2833/Ahd/2014/Srt/2017/A.Y.2009-10 Page 2 Of 19 In Ita No.1879/Ahd/2013/Ay.2009-10 By The Revenue:- 2. Ground No. 1& 2 Relates To Deleting The Addition Of Rs.5,58,41,797/-

section 45(3) of the Act are not applicable. The CIT(A) has also supported his view by placing reliance on the decision of ITAT, Mumbai Bench in the case of Voltas International Ltd. (2009) 126 TTJ 702 (Mum), Badridas Gauridu (P) Ltd. (2004) 187 CTR 453/ (2003) 261 ITR 256 (Bom.). Hence, considering the foreign exchange contract entered