Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

46 results for “disallowance”+ Section 195clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,492 Mumbai1,472 Chennai612 Bangalore543 Kolkata287 Jaipur167 Ahmedabad160 Hyderabad90 Pune87 Chandigarh83 Karnataka52 Raipur49 Rajkot48 Surat46 Calcutta41 Lucknow34 Visakhapatnam31 Indore27 Nagpur24 Cochin16 Guwahati15 Patna12 SC10 Dehradun9 Agra8 Cuttack8 Allahabad8 Panaji7 Telangana6 Amritsar5 Jodhpur5 Jabalpur3 Ranchi2 Orissa2 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1 Kerala1 Rajasthan1 Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 26356 Section 40A(3)39 Section 143(3)39 Addition to Income34 Disallowance30 Section 14819 Section 254(1)19 Section 14718 Section 80P(2)(d)15 Section 690

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT vs. M/S. J K PAPER LIMITED, SURAT

In the result, all these three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 6/SRT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 May 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 10(1)Section 115JSection 254(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 41(1)

section 195 of the Act. The assessee was issued show cause notice as to why a disallowance under section 40 a (i) should

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(2), SURAT vs. J K PAPER LTD, SURAT

In the result, all these three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Showing 1–20 of 46 · Page 1 of 3

13

Limitation/Time-bar9

ITA 157/SRT/2020[2015-16]Status: Disposed

ITAT Surat

06 May 2022

AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 10(1)Section 115JSection 254(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 41(1)

section 195 of the Act. The assessee was issued show cause notice as to why a disallowance under section 40 a (i) should

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(2), SURAT vs. J K PAPER LTD, SURAT

In the result, all these three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 156/SRT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 10(1)Section 115JSection 254(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 41(1)

section 195 of the Act. The assessee was issued show cause notice as to why a disallowance under section 40 a (i) should

THE ACIT, CIRCLE 2,, BHARUCH vs. M/S. JAYSHREE AROMATICS PVT. LTD.,, BHARUCH

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 2277/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat20 Jan 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) The Assistant Commissioner Jayshree Aromatics Pvt. Ltd., Of Income Tax, Plot No.4703, 4704, 4705/1-4, Vs Circle-2, Bharuch. Gidc Estate, Ankleshwar, Dist. Bharch – 393002. Pan: Aabcj 8258 R Appellant/ Revenue Respondent/ Assessee

Section 10BSection 143(3)Section 254(1)

disallowance of deduction under section 10B of the Act. The ld.CIT-DR for the Revenue submits that during the assessment, the AO noted that no separate employee was recruited by the assessee for newly set up unit no new ESI and PF registration was obtained. At the time of filing the original return of income, the assessee claimed deduction under

SATYAM TEXTILE PARK,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), SURAT

In the result the ground No

ITA 91/SRT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Oct 2021AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Saini

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 254(1)Section 263Section 271DSection 40

195 of the Finance Act, 2016 except provision of Chapter XV, Section 119, Section 138 and section 189 of the Income Tax Act. On the basis of the above submissions the ld AR for the assessee submits that the assessment order for both the years cannot be branded as erroneous, thus, cannot be subject to revision under section

SATYAM TEXTILE PARK,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), SURAT

In the result the ground No

ITA 90/SRT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Oct 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Saini

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 254(1)Section 263Section 271DSection 40

195 of the Finance Act, 2016 except provision of Chapter XV, Section 119, Section 138 and section 189 of the Income Tax Act. On the basis of the above submissions the ld AR for the assessee submits that the assessment order for both the years cannot be branded as erroneous, thus, cannot be subject to revision under section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT vs. PANDESARA GREEN ENVIRONMENT WATER WELFARE COOP. SOCIETY LIMITED, SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 244/SRT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Aug 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 194A(3)(v)Section 254(1)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

195, G.I.D.C., Opp. Wintex Mills, Pandesara. PAN No. AAAAP 0743 Q Appellant/ assessee Respondent/ revenue Department represented by Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr.DR Assessee represented by Shri Sapnesh Sheth, C.A. Date of Institution of Appeals 13/04/2023 Date of hearing 28/08/2023 Date of pronouncement 28/08/2023 Order under Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. These three

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT vs. PANDESARA GREEN ENVIRONMENT WATER WELFARE COOP. SOCIETY LIMITED, SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 246/SRT/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Aug 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 194A(3)(v)Section 254(1)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

195, G.I.D.C., Opp. Wintex Mills, Pandesara. PAN No. AAAAP 0743 Q Appellant/ assessee Respondent/ revenue Department represented by Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr.DR Assessee represented by Shri Sapnesh Sheth, C.A. Date of Institution of Appeals 13/04/2023 Date of hearing 28/08/2023 Date of pronouncement 28/08/2023 Order under Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. These three

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT vs. PANDESARA GREEN ENVIRONMENT WATER WELFARE COOP. SOCIETY LIMITED, SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 245/SRT/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 194A(3)(v)Section 254(1)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

195, G.I.D.C., Opp. Wintex Mills, Pandesara. PAN No. AAAAP 0743 Q Appellant/ assessee Respondent/ revenue Department represented by Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr.DR Assessee represented by Shri Sapnesh Sheth, C.A. Date of Institution of Appeals 13/04/2023 Date of hearing 28/08/2023 Date of pronouncement 28/08/2023 Order under Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. These three

AMRUT SAROVAR,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISIONER INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), SURAT

In the result the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in all three assessment years are allowed

ITA 93/SRT/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Oct 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 254(1)Section 263

195 of the Finance Act, 2016 except provision of Chapter XV, Section 119, Section 138 and section 189 of the Income Tax Act. The ld AR for the assessee submits that the assessment order in accepting the contention is not erroneous or legally unsustainable. 13. On the fourth issue identified by ld PCIT, which relates to non-verification cash expenses

AMRUT SAROVAR,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISIONER INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), SURAT

In the result the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in all three assessment years are allowed

ITA 92/SRT/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Oct 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 254(1)Section 263

195 of the Finance Act, 2016 except provision of Chapter XV, Section 119, Section 138 and section 189 of the Income Tax Act. The ld AR for the assessee submits that the assessment order in accepting the contention is not erroneous or legally unsustainable. 13. On the fourth issue identified by ld PCIT, which relates to non-verification cash expenses

AMRUT SAROVAR,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISIONER INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), SURAT

In the result the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in all three assessment years are allowed

ITA 94/SRT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Oct 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 254(1)Section 263

195 of the Finance Act, 2016 except provision of Chapter XV, Section 119, Section 138 and section 189 of the Income Tax Act. The ld AR for the assessee submits that the assessment order in accepting the contention is not erroneous or legally unsustainable. 13. On the fourth issue identified by ld PCIT, which relates to non-verification cash expenses

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, SURAT vs. M/S. J.K. PAPER LTD.,, SURAT

In the result this ground of appeal is dismissed

ITA 365/SRT/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat29 Apr 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble(Virtual Hearing) आ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.365/Srt/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S J. K. Paper Ltd., Income Tax, Circle-1(1)(2), P.O. Central Pulp Mills, Surat. Fort Songadh – 394660. Dist. Tapi, Gujarat. [Pan: Aaact 6305 N] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""थ"/Respondent

Section 115JSection 14ASection 41(1)

section 195 of the Act. The assessee was issued show cause notice as to why a disallowance under section 40 a (i) should

THE ACIT,BHARUCH CIRCLE,, BHARUCH vs. BHARUCH ENVIRO INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,, ANKLESHWAR

In the result, this ground of appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1867/AHD/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Dec 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 44ASection 80I

disallowed by A.O and at the ITA Nos1849 & 1867/AHD/2014 (A.Y. 08-09) Bharuch Enviro Infrastructure Ltd. time of establishment of Land fill Project –II, no new establishment came in to existence. The nature of work being done by both the project is identical, therefore, the claim of the assessee based on the backdate agreement cannot be considered. We find that

BHARUCH ENVIRO INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,,BHARUCH vs. THE DY.CIT.,BHARUCH CIRCLE,, BHARUCH

In the result, this ground of appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1849/AHD/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Dec 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 44ASection 80I

disallowed by A.O and at the ITA Nos1849 & 1867/AHD/2014 (A.Y. 08-09) Bharuch Enviro Infrastructure Ltd. time of establishment of Land fill Project –II, no new establishment came in to existence. The nature of work being done by both the project is identical, therefore, the claim of the assessee based on the backdate agreement cannot be considered. We find that

AL MEHMOOD CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 1(5),, BHARUCH

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee (ITA No

ITA 93/SRT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Jan 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.92 & 93/Srt/2022 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: (2016-17 & 2017-18) (Physical Court Hearing) Al Mehmood Charitable Trust, Income Tax Officer, By Pass Road Jambusar, Vs. Ward-1(5), Bharuch. Bharuch-392150 (Appellant) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaata 2702 M िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca राज"व क" ओर से /Respondent By Shri Ashok B. Koli, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing 12/01/2023 उ"ोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 24/01/2023

Section 11Section 12A(1)(b)Section 143(1)Section 154

disallowing the claim of the assessee. 5. On appeal, the CIT(A) has confirmed the order of Assessing Officer, therefore assessee is in further appeal before us. 6. Shri Rasesh Shah, Learned Counsel for the assessee, argues that return of income was filed by the assessee on 28.03.2018, whereas the audit report was filed on 29.03.2018 (very next

AL MEHMOOD CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 1(5),, BHARUCH

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee (ITA No

ITA 92/SRT/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Jan 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.92 & 93/Srt/2022 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: (2016-17 & 2017-18) (Physical Court Hearing) Al Mehmood Charitable Trust, Income Tax Officer, By Pass Road Jambusar, Vs. Ward-1(5), Bharuch. Bharuch-392150 (Appellant) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaata 2702 M िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca राज"व क" ओर से /Respondent By Shri Ashok B. Koli, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing 12/01/2023 उ"ोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 24/01/2023

Section 11Section 12A(1)(b)Section 143(1)Section 154

disallowing the claim of the assessee. 5. On appeal, the CIT(A) has confirmed the order of Assessing Officer, therefore assessee is in further appeal before us. 6. Shri Rasesh Shah, Learned Counsel for the assessee, argues that return of income was filed by the assessee on 28.03.2018, whereas the audit report was filed on 29.03.2018 (very next

RUNI IMPEX,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3(2), SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 220/SRT/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat03 Apr 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.220/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2011-12) (Hybrid Processing Hearing) Runi Impex Deputy Commissioner Of Income- 32, Madhav Kung Society, Vs. Tax Circle-3(2), Surat, Aaykar Dabholi Road, Surat-395 004 Bhavan, Majura Gate, Surat-395 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aamfr 2340 A (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent)

Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80I

section 143(3) rws 147 of the Act, even though it is capricious in nature and has been made ignoring the established and ITA No.220/SRT/2024/AY.2011-12 Runi Impex undisputed facts. The said order is contrary to the facts and circumstances of the case and the applicable provisions of the Act. GROUND NO.2 The learned CIT(A) erred in upholding the disallowance

SACHIN NOTIFIED AREA,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , SURAT - 1, SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 343/SRT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jun 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.343/Srt/2022 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Physical Hearing) Sachin Notified Area, Vs. The Pcit, Surat-1 Plot No.5719, Unnati Building, Sachin Gidc, Sachin, Surat-394230. (Appellant) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaals0146H Shri P. M. Jagasheth, Ca Appellant By Shri Ravinder Sindhu, Cit(Dr) Respondent By Date Of Hearing 31/05/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 26/06/2023

Section 143(3)Section 263

disallowance, the assessee is in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). Therefore, assessment order has merged with the order Ld. CIT(A) and therefore the said assessment order should not be revised by the Ld. PCIT under section 263 of the Act. The ld Counsel also stated that the direction given by ld PCIT (vide para 9 of his order

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT vs. BETEX INDIA LIMITED, SURAT

In the result, Ground No. 4 to 6 raised by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 174/SRT/2021[2008-9]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Dec 2022

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, CAFor Respondent: Sr. DR

disallowance of alleged unaccounted job work receipt by assessee. Hence, ground No.1 to 4 raised by Revenue are dismissed. 18. Considering the fact that we have upheld the action of ld CIT(A) hence, sole ground of appeal raised by assessee in its appeal is also dismissed. In the result, assessees appeal is dismissed.” 8. Since, the issue is squarely