BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 151Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai64Jaipur20Ahmedabad19Delhi15Hyderabad12Pune11Chandigarh10Lucknow5Visakhapatnam5Rajkot4Chennai4Raipur4Kolkata3Surat3Agra1Indore1Bangalore1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 1487Section 1475Section 148A4Section 151A3Section 254(1)2Addition to Income2

MEGHNA ORGANIC,VALSAD vs. ITO, WARD-5, VAPI

ITA 824/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat17 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 147Section 148Section 151ASection 250Section 270A(8)Section 271FSection 272A(1)(d)

Section 151A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well as the law on the subject, the learned Assessing Officer has erred in re-opening the assessment Meghna Organic Vs. ITO Asst. Year : 2018-19 - 2– u/s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and issuing notice

MADHUBEN HARKISHANDAS PATEL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD2(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1085/SRT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1085/Srt/2024 (Ay 2016-17) (Physical Court Hearing) Madhuben Harkishandas Patel Income Tax Officer, Ward- 65, Vav Faliyu, Village-Sandhiyer, 2(2)(1), Surat, Aayakar Bhavan, बनाम Surat-394 130 Majura Gate, Surat-395 001 Vs [Pan : Azfpp 1116 Q] अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent

Section 147Section 148Section 151ASection 254(1)Section 55A

section 151A. Madhuben H Patel 4.On facts and circumstances of the case as well as law on subject, ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming action of AO in making addition of Rs.1,36,47,625/- being indexed cost of acquisition when no reference to DVO is made u/s 55A. 5.On facts and circumstances of the case as well

VIVEK KHABIA,SURAT vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, ground No. 3 is allowed and ground No

ITA 1072/SRT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat05 Mar 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1072/Srt/2024 (Ay 2018-19) (Physical Court Hearing) Vivek Khabia Income Tax Officer, Ward- H.No.1187-90-91, 1089, Office 2(3)(4), Surat, Aaykar Bhavan, बनाम No.411, New Dtc Gheekanta Majura Gate, Surat-395 001 Vs Road, Nr. Bhavani Vad Temple, Haripura, Surat-395 003 [Pan : Avspk 5724 E] अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent

Section 133(6)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151ASection 254(1)Section 28

151A of the Act. 2.0 On facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the validity of notice u/s 148, though issued without following the procedure prescribed u/s 148A and in absence of information that suggests the income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. 3.0 On facts and circumstances of the case