Search: disallowance

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 10A(2)(ia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai73 Delhi57 Bangalore50 Chennai31 Hyderabad23 Kolkata14 Visakhapatnam9 Jaipur9 Pune9 Amritsar8 Cochin5 Ahmedabad5 Indore3 SC2 Dehradun2 Chandigarh2 Surat2 Rajkot2 Jodhpur1 Nagpur1 Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 807 Section 142(1)4 Section 2634 Section 80I4 Section 1442 Section 80P(2)(a)2 Section 143(3)2 Deduction2

THE WANKA VIVIDH KARYAKARI SEVA SAHKARI MANDALI LTD,TAPI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD2 BARDOLI, BARDOLI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 470/SRT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Oct 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhआ.अ.सं./Ita No.470/Srt/2023 (Ay 2017-18) (Hearing In Physical Court) The Wanka Vividh Karyakari Seva Income Tax Officer, Sahkari Mandali Ltd. Ward-2, Bardoli, Income Vs At & Po Wanka, Taluka-Nizar, Tax Office, 2Nd Floor, Bsnl Tapi-394370 Building, Opp. Jalaram Akshaymodi40@Gmail.Com Temple, Station Road, Pan No: Aahft 1009 K Bardoli-394601 अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 254(1)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

disallowed the deduction under section 80P and treated the same as income of assessee. I find that before Ld. CIT(A) assessee filed similar submission as argued before me. The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the action of Assessing Office by taking view that claiming deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2((d) the assessee failed to file

THE WANKA VIVIDH KARYAKARI SEVA SAHKARI MANDALI LTD,TAPI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD2 BARDOLI, BARDOLI

THE WANKA VIVIDH KARYAKARI SEVA SAHKARI MANDALI LTD,TAPI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD2 BARDOLI, BARDOLI

MANISH PACKAGING PVT. LTD.,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1, SURAT