MAROLI VIBHAG KHAND UDYOG SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD,.,NA vs. ARIVS.ACIT, NAVSARI CIRCLE, , NAVSARI

section 37 and the disallowance thereof results into Department\ntaxing unreal and wrong amount of income.\n13.\nOn the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well in law, both the\nlower authorities have overlooked the claim in the return of income filed\nfor the carried forwards of business loss and unabsorbed depreciation as\nassessed in the regular

SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDAL LTD.,,GANDEVI vs. ACIT, NAVSARI CIRCLE, NAVSARI, NAVSARI

section 37 and the disallowance thereof results into Department\ntaxing unreal and wrong amount of income.\n13.\nOn the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well in law, both the\nlower authorities have overlooked the claim in the return of income filed\nfor the carried forwards of business loss and unabsorbed depreciation as\nassessed in the regular

ACIT, NA vs. ARI CIRCLE, NAVSARIVS.M/S. MAROLI VIBHAG KHAND UDYOG SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD.,, NAVSARI

In the result, all the appeals are disposed of in the manner indicated\nhereinbefore

section 37 and the disallowance thereof results into Department\ntaxing unreal and wrong amount of income.\n13.\nOn the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well in law, both the\nlower authorities have overlooked the claim in the return of income filed\nfor the carried forwards of business loss and unabsorbed depreciation as\nassessed in the regular

ACIT, NA vs. ARI CIRCLE, NAVSARIVS.M/S. MAROLI VIBHAG, KAND UDYOG SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD., NAVSARI

In the result, all the appeals are disposed of in the manner indicated\nhereinbefore

section 37 and the disallowance thereof results into Department\ntaxing unreal and wrong amount of income.\n13.\nOn the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well in law, both the\nlower authorities have overlooked the claim in the return of income filed\nfor the carried forwards of business loss and unabsorbed depreciation as\nassessed in the regular

SAHADARI KHAND UDYOG MANDAL LTD.,,NA vs. ARIVS.ACIT, NAVSARI CIRCLE, NAVSARI, NAVSARI

section 37 and the disallowance thereof results into Department\ntaxing unreal and wrong amount of income.\n13.\nOn the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well in law, both the\nlower authorities have overlooked the claim in the return of income filed\nfor the carried forwards of business loss and unabsorbed depreciation as\nassessed in the regular

ACIT, NA vs. ARI CIRCLE., NAVSARIVS.M/S. MAROLI VIBHAG KHAND UDYOG SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD,, NAVASARI

section 37 and the disallowance thereof results into Department\ntaxing unreal and wrong amount of income.\n13.\nOn the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well in law, both the\nlower authorities have overlooked the claim in the return of income filed\nfor the carried forwards of business loss and unabsorbed depreciation as\nassessed in the regular

THE WANKA VIVIDH KARYAKARI SEVA SAHKARI MANDALI LTD,TAPI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD2 BARDOLI, BARDOLI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhआ.अ.सं./Ita No.470/Srt/2023 (Ay 2017-18) (Hearing In Physical Court) The Wanka Vividh Karyakari Seva Income Tax Officer, Sahkari Mandali Ltd. Ward-2, Bardoli, Income Vs At & Po Wanka, Taluka-Nizar, Tax Office, 2Nd Floor, Bsnl Tapi-394370 Building, Opp. Jalaram Akshaymodi40@Gmail.Com Temple, Station Road, Pan No: Aahft 1009 K Bardoli-394601 अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [for short to as “Ld. NFAC/Ld.CIT(A)”] dated 15.05.2023 for assessment year 2017-18, which in turn arises from the addition made by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-2 Bardoli /Assessing Officer

VAPI GREEN ENVIRO LIMITED,VAPI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, , VALSAD

In the result, various grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) Vapi Green Enviro Limited, Pr.C.I.T., Valsad. 135, 1St Floor, Via House, G.I.D.C. 301, 3Rd Floor, Palak Vs. Char Rasta, Vapi, Gujarat, Arcade, Shanti Nagar, India-396195. Tithal Road, Pan: Aaacv 8289 P Valsad-396001. Appellant Respondednt

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Valsad [in short the ld. Pr.CIT] dated 31/03/2023 passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act) for the Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19. The assessee

SAHAJANAND MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ,SURAT vs. SURAT, SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 998/Srt/2024 (Ay 2006-07) (Physical Court Hearing) Sahajanand Medical Technologies Deputy Commissioner Of Income- Ltd. Nr. Dabholi Char Rasta, Tax, Circle-2(1)(2), Surat, Room बनाम Ved Road, No.602, 6Th Floor, Vs Surat-395 004 Aaykar Bhavan, Majura Gate, [Pan : Aafcs 7694 L] Surat-395001 अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals)-4, Surat [for short to as “Ld.CIT(A)] dated 30.03.2022 for assessment year (AY) 2006-07, which in turn confirming penalty levied by Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Income

MOHAMMEDALTAF ABDULKADAR MEMON,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2)(1) AND DCIT,CPC, SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) Mohammedaltaf Abdulkadar Memon, I.T.O. 4/4478 Taiyabi Street, Ward- 2(2)(1), Vs. Zampa Bazar, Surat & Dcit, Cpc Surat-395003. Bangalore) Pan: Ahzpm 3224 E Appellant Respondednt

Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC)/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short the ld. CIT(A)] dated 11/01/2023 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal

SHRI SUDHIR KAPOORCHAND GANDHI,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2(3), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Physical Hearing) Sudhir Kapoorchand Gandhi, A.C.I.T., C/O-Ateet Gandhi, 3, Shepway Circle-2(3), Vs. Bungalow, Off Juhu Tara Road, Surat, Azad Lane, Juhu Koliwada, Near

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of learned National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (in short, the NFAC)/ Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (in short, the ld. CIT(A)) dated 02/03/2023 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16. The assessee has raised following grounds

SHRI GORDHANBHAI R. ASODARIA,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, SURAT

In the result, the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Virtual Hearing) Shri Gordhanbhai R. Asodaria, A.C.I.T., 8, Raghuvir Bunglow, City Light Road, Central Circle-3, Vs. Parle Point, Surat-395007. Surat. Pan No. Abapa 6910 G Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Surat (in short, the ld. CIT(A)) dated 04/08/2022 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: “1

SAGAR EMBROTECH,SURAT vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE -1(2), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Physical Hearing) Sagar Embrotech, A.C.I.T., 94, Village Popada Hojiwala Circle-1(2), Vs. Industrial Estate, Gate No. 2, Aayakar Bhawan, Majura Sachin Palsana Road, Gate, Surat. Surat-394230. Pan No. Abrfs 9325 C Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC)/learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (in short, the ld. CIT(A)) dated 03/05/2023 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: “1

MUKESH RAJENDRA PRASAD THAKUR,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, VAPI

In the result, appeal of assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Sainiआ.अ.सं./Ita No.590/Srt/2023 (Ay 2016-17) (Hearing In Physical Court) Mukesh Rajendra Prasad Assistant Commissioner Of Thakur Income Tax, Vapi Circle, Vs 3-9-9R Navjivan Society, Room No.708, 7Th Floor, Lamington Road, Mumbai- Fortune Square-Ii, Chala, 400008 Daman Road, Vapi-396191 Pan : Aarpt 3055 D अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [for short to as ‘NFAC/Ld. PCIT’] dated 19.06.2023 for assessment year 2016-17, which in turn arises out of assessment order passed by Assessing Officer passed assessment order under section

JAYANTILAL VALLABHBHAI RAMOLIYA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD -3(3)(2), SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Sainiआ.अ.सं./Ita No.342/Srt/2017 (Ay 2012-13) (Hearing In Physical Court) Jayantilal Vallabhbhai Income Tax Officer, Ramoliya, 33-134, Miranagar Ward-3(3)(2), Aaykar Bhavan, Vs Society, Varachha Road, Majura Gate, Surat-395001 Surat-395006 Pan No. Abipr 3365 A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-3 Surat [for short to as “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 11.09.2017 for the assessment year 2012-13, which in turn arises out of assessment order passed by Assessing Officer under section

M/S N. A. SHAIKH,ANKLESHWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(5), BHARUCH

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Physical Hearing) M/S N.A. Shaikh, I.T.O., Shop No. 1, Old Shopping Centre, Ward 2(5), Vs. Nr. Pratin Crossing, Gidc, Bharuch. Ankleshwar-393002. Pan No. Aabfn 9617 R Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of learned National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC)/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (in short, the ld. CIT(A) dated 21/01/2023 for the Assessment year (AY) 2014-15. 2. At the outset of hearing, learned Authorized Representative (Ld.AR

TARIT F. DAS,BHARUCH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIR.1, BHARUCH

In the result this ground of appeal is also dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Physical Hearing) Tarit F Das, A.C.I.T., Aaa-49, Shreeji Sadan Bungalows, Circle-1, Vs. Swaminarayan Mandir Road, Bharuch. Zadeshwar Road, Bharuch. Pan No. Acgpd 8543 H Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Vadodara, (in short, the ld. CIT(A)) dated 14/07/2020 for the Assessment year (AY) 2014-15 wherein the assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: “1. Assessment order

S J P CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,SURAT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1)(2), SURAT

In the result, ground No. 1 to 3 of the appeal are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Sainiआ.अ.सं./Ita No.430/Srt/2023 (Ay 2015-16) (Hearing In Physical Court) S J P Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Deputy Commissioner Of E-3300, Radhakrishna Textile Income Tax, Circle-2(1)(2) Vs Market, Ring Road, Surat- Surat, Aaykar Bhavan, 395002 Income Tax Colony, Pan No. Aajcs 4313 C Athwa, Surat-395001 अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [for short to as “NFAC/Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 14.06.2023 for the assessment year 2015-16, which in turn arises out of assessment order passed by Assessing Officer under section 143(3) of Income