BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “depreciation”+ Section 195(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai549Delhi502Chennai259Bangalore233Kolkata80Jaipur77Ahmedabad42Raipur30Hyderabad20Pune19Lucknow18Rajkot17Karnataka13Indore10Cochin8Surat7Visakhapatnam6SC5Guwahati5Chandigarh4Agra3Panaji3Amritsar2Jodhpur2Telangana2Nagpur2Jabalpur1Cuttack1Patna1Kerala1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Addition to Income7Section 254(1)6Section 143(3)6Section 40A(2)(b)6Disallowance6Section 271(1)(c)3Section 10(1)3Section 41(1)3Section 115J3

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT vs. M/S. J K PAPER LIMITED, SURAT

In the result, all these three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 6/SRT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 May 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 10(1)Section 115JSection 254(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 41(1)

6. Aggrieved by the order of ld CIT(A), the revenue has filed present appeal before this Tribunal. 7. We have heard the submissions of Sh H.P. Meena learned Commissioner of income tax-departmental representative (CIT-DR) for the revenue and the learned Senior Advocate Sh. Saurabh Suparkar, assisted by Ms Urvashi Sodhan Advocate, hereafter referred as learned Senior Counsel

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(2), SURAT vs. J K PAPER LTD, SURAT

Section 403
Penalty3

In the result, all these three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 156/SRT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 10(1)Section 115JSection 254(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 41(1)

6. Aggrieved by the order of ld CIT(A), the revenue has filed present appeal before this Tribunal. 7. We have heard the submissions of Sh H.P. Meena learned Commissioner of income tax-departmental representative (CIT-DR) for the revenue and the learned Senior Advocate Sh. Saurabh Suparkar, assisted by Ms Urvashi Sodhan Advocate, hereafter referred as learned Senior Counsel

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(2), SURAT vs. J K PAPER LTD, SURAT

In the result, all these three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 157/SRT/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 May 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 10(1)Section 115JSection 254(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 41(1)

6. Aggrieved by the order of ld CIT(A), the revenue has filed present appeal before this Tribunal. 7. We have heard the submissions of Sh H.P. Meena learned Commissioner of income tax-departmental representative (CIT-DR) for the revenue and the learned Senior Advocate Sh. Saurabh Suparkar, assisted by Ms Urvashi Sodhan Advocate, hereafter referred as learned Senior Counsel

CHANDULAL A.SHAH(HUF),SURAT vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(1),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee, Ind for A

ITA 83/SRT/2017[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 May 2020AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं././././I.T.A Nos.83 & 84/Srt/2017 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2000-01 & 2004-05 1.Chandulal Amrutlal Shah (Huf), V. Income Tax Officer, Bunglow No.74, Saifee Society, Ward-3(3)(1), Surat. L.H. Road, Surat-395 006. [Pan: Aaahc 8116 R] 2.Chandulal Amrutlal Shah, V. Income Tax Officer, Bunglow No.74, Saifee Society, Ward-3(3)(1), Surat. L.H. Road, Surat-395 006. [Pan: Adaps 5844 F] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""थ"/Respondent

Section 147Section 148

195 Taxman 117 (Bombay). 6. On the other hand, the ld. Sr. D.R. drew our attention to Para 14 of the assessment order wherein the AO mentioned that on examination on capital account. The assessee has shown opening capital balance at Rs.16,97,252/-, the assessee asked to furnish the details of show-cause notice dated

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2,, BHARUCH vs. GUJARAT INSECTICIDES LTD.,, BHARUCH

In the result, this ground of appeal is dismissed

ITA 2519/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Sept 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 40Section 40A(2)(b)

195, clearly indicate that closing stock of MPB differentiated by showing 1775 kgs as finished stock and 4525 kgs. as work-in-progress. The assessee contended that there was a mistake cropped up as regards quantity of finished goods and work-in-progress of MPB. It was clarified that total quantity of 6300 kgs. was in respect of finished goods

GUJARAT INSECTICIDES LTD.,,BHARUCH vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BHARUCH CIRCLE,, BHARUCH

In the result, this ground of appeal is dismissed

ITA 3053/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 40Section 40A(2)(b)

195, clearly indicate that closing stock of MPB differentiated by showing 1775 kgs as finished stock and 4525 kgs. as work-in-progress. The assessee contended that there was a mistake cropped up as regards quantity of finished goods and work-in-progress of MPB. It was clarified that total quantity of 6300 kgs. was in respect of finished goods

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2,, BHARUCH vs. GUJARAT INSECTICIDES LTD.,, BHARUCH

In the result, this ground of appeal is dismissed

ITA 3273/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 40Section 40A(2)(b)

195, clearly indicate that closing stock of MPB differentiated by showing 1775 kgs as finished stock and 4525 kgs. as work-in-progress. The assessee contended that there was a mistake cropped up as regards quantity of finished goods and work-in-progress of MPB. It was clarified that total quantity of 6300 kgs. was in respect of finished goods