SHYAM CORPORATION,SURAT vs. PR. CIT-2, SURAT

In the result, the appeals of the assessees (in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.107 & 108/Srt/2020 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:(2015-16) (Virtual Court Hearing) Shyam Corporation, Vs. The Pcit-2, Surat. S. No. 84/1, 885 Block No.137, T.P. No.58, F.P. No.38, B/H. Siddhivinayak Complex, Bamroli, Surat-394210. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Acgfs7598M (Assessee) (Respondent) Shivam Enterprises, Vs. The Pcit-2, Surat. Tp. 43, Block No.50, Fp.30, At Post Bhimrad, Althan, Surat-395017. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Acdfs9748Q

Business loss of Rs.2,52,799/- and unabsorbed depreciation of Rs.26,592/-. In view of such claims the assessee has returned income

SHIVAM ENTERPRISE,ALTHAN vs. PR. CIT-2, SURAT

In the result, the appeals of the assessees (in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.107 & 108/Srt/2020 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:(2015-16) (Virtual Court Hearing) Shyam Corporation, Vs. The Pcit-2, Surat. S. No. 84/1, 885 Block No.137, T.P. No.58, F.P. No.38, B/H. Siddhivinayak Complex, Bamroli, Surat-394210. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Acgfs7598M (Assessee) (Respondent) Shivam Enterprises, Vs. The Pcit-2, Surat. Tp. 43, Block No.50, Fp.30, At Post Bhimrad, Althan, Surat-395017. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Acdfs9748Q

Business loss of Rs.2,52,799/- and unabsorbed depreciation of Rs.26,592/-. In view of such claims the assessee has returned income

SHREE HARI PROCESSORS INDIA PVT. LTD.,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - 2(1)(2) (NEW ITO WD. 2(1)(3), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) Shree Hari Processors India Income Tax Officer, Pvt. Ltd., Block No.99/P, Post Ward-2(1)(2), [New Ito Wd Vs Tatithaiya, 2(1)(3)] Aayakar Bhawan, Tal-Palsana, Majura Gate, Surat-394 372 Surat-395001 E-Mail:Jain_Tex@Yahoo.Com Pan : Aadca 1313 N Appellant /Assessee Respondent / Revenue

depreciation and treated the rental income as income from “house property” instead of ‘business income’. The Assessing Officer rectified his order

THE UDHNA UDYOGNAGAR SAHAKARI SANGH LTD.,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1),, SURAT

In the result, appeal for A

Bench: Shri C.M.Garg & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No. 3&4/Ahd/2014/Srt िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : 2005-06 & 2006-07 Udhna Udyognagar Sahakari Vs. Income-Tax Officer, Sangh Ltd, Ward.3(1), Central Road No.10, Room No.116, 1St Floor, Post Box No.1224, Aayakar Bhavan, Udyognagar, Udhna, Majuragate, Surat. Surat. Pan: Aaaat 2932K अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri Viresh I. Rudalal & िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By Shri Rushi J. Parekh, C.A. Shri J.K. Chandnani, Sr. Dr राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By 19.06.2018 सुनवाई क" तारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 27.06.2018 उ"ोषणा क" तारीख/Pronouncement On आदेश /O R D E R

business income has been made. It is also clear from the C.A. certificate, placed at paper book page-43 that no expenditure on account of repairs, maintenance and depreciation

THE UDHNA UDYOGNAGAR SAHAKARI SANGH LTD.,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1),, SURAT

In the result, appeal for A

Bench: Shri C.M.Garg & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No. 3&4/Ahd/2014/Srt िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : 2005-06 & 2006-07 Udhna Udyognagar Sahakari Vs. Income-Tax Officer, Sangh Ltd, Ward.3(1), Central Road No.10, Room No.116, 1St Floor, Post Box No.1224, Aayakar Bhavan, Udyognagar, Udhna, Majuragate, Surat. Surat. Pan: Aaaat 2932K अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri Viresh I. Rudalal & िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By Shri Rushi J. Parekh, C.A. Shri J.K. Chandnani, Sr. Dr राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By 19.06.2018 सुनवाई क" तारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 27.06.2018 उ"ोषणा क" तारीख/Pronouncement On आदेश /O R D E R

business income has been made. It is also clear from the C.A. certificate, placed at paper book page-43 that no expenditure on account of repairs, maintenance and depreciation

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VALSAD CIRCLE, VALSAD vs. M/S. MANGALDEEP, VALSAD

In the result, appeals in ITA No

Bench: Shripawan Singh, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.699/Srt/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2015-16) (Virtual Court Hearing) The Acit, Valsad Circle, Vs. M/S. Mangaldeep, 1St Floor, Shankeshwar Complex, Valsad. Dhobiwad, Valsad, Valsad-396001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aahfm7130L (Appellant) (Respondent) Cross Objection No.11/Srt/2021 [Arising In Ita No.699/Srt/2018] ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2015-16) (Virtual Court Hearing) M/S. Mangaldeep, Vs. The Acit, Valsad Circle, 1St Floor, Shankeshwar Complex, Valsad. Dhobiwad, Valsad, Valsad-396001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aahfm7130L (Applicant-Co-Objector) (Respondent)

depreciation on motor car, interest on car loan, motor car expenses, motor car repairing, mobile phone expenses, telephone expenses and travelling expenses. In the assessment order, the AO noted that the personal and non-business use of the above expenses cannot be ruled out. The ld Counsel contended that books of account are maintained on day to day basis

SHANTI ENTERPRISE,,SURAT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (HQ) -1 , SURAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.271/Srt/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2010-11) (Virtual Court Hearing) Shanti Enterprises, Vs. The Dcit (Hq)-1, Millenium Textile Market, Shop Surat. No.1013-14, Umarwada, Kamela Darwaja, Ring Road, Surat-395002. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aalfs5217L (Assessee) (Respondent)

income and the assessee should be allowed set off of business loss and depreciation. Learned Counsel for the assessee took

M/S. GLOBE TEXTILES,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), NOW RE-DESIGNATED AS INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(2)(6),, SURAT

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Madhumita Roym/S. Globe Textiles, Vs. Ito, 45-46, Hashimi Estate, Ward – 2(1), Udhna Main Road, Surat. Surat-394 210. [Pan No. Aacfg 2121 J] (Appellant) (Respondent) ..

depreciation loss in the initial year 2002-03 and then even business losses from A.Y. 2004-05. Thus, the assessee decided to sell off its business assets being the factory and building thereon. Since the said factory building was a business asset and not an investment, the profit on sale thereof was offered by the assessee as business income

SHILPRAJ DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD.,,SURAT vs. A.C.I.T, , CIRCLE-4,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 2608/Ahd/2014 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2008-09) (Virtual Court Hearing) Shilpraj Developers Pvt. Ltd., The Acit, Circle- 4, Vs. 12, Suryakiran Apartment, Ghod-Dod Surat. Road, Surat-395005. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadcs3045H (Assessee) (Respondent)

income is not available either for intra-head adjustment or inter-head adjustment. No carry forward business or depreciation loss

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, SURAT vs. M/S SURAT LIFE CARE PVT. LTD., SURAT

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.160/Srt/2023 Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Physical Hearing) The Acit, Vs. M/S. Surat Life Care Pvt. Ltd., Central Circle – 3, Unique Hospital, Opp. Kiran Motor, Surat Nr. Sosyo Circle Lane, Surat - 395002 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aarcs8396M (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr Shri P. M. Jagasheth, Ca Respondent By 14/12/2023 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement 21/12/2023

income for the year under consideration on 12.10.2013, declaring total loss of Rs.76,07,560. The same included business loss of Rs.23,90,076/- and allowed depreciation

SHIVAM DEVELOPERS,GODADRA vs. ITO, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.76/Srt/2020 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2015-16) (Physical Court Hearing) Shivam Developers, Vs. The Pr. Cit-2, 141, Khodiyar Residency, Surat. Godadra, Surat-395010. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Acffs4002D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Sapnesh Sheth, Ca Respondent By Shri Ritesh Mishra, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 06/10/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 11/11/2022

business income. For that, on identical facts, the reliance can be placed on the judgment of Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Suman Papers & Boards Ltd. , 314 ITR 119 (Guj.) wherein it was held as follows: “2. The controversy relates to block period commencing from asst. yr. 1986-87 and ending on 6th Jan., 1996. The respondent

SHRI PRAKASHBHAI HARIBHAI AHIR,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), SURAT

In the result, the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) Shri Prakashbhai Haribhai Ahir, The Income Tax Officer, 23, Ashish Society, Ward-1(3)(8), Surat. Vs B/H.Navyug College, Rander Road, Surat. Pan: Abfpa 9237 R Appellant Respondent

business income’ instead of ‘income from House Property’. 4. On further perusal of Audit Report and Computation of Income, the AO noted that the assessee claimed depreciation

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, SURAT vs. M/S. IMPERIAL DEVELOPERS,, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Shri O.P.Meenas. आ.अ.सं./I.T.A अपीलाथ" Appellant Vs ""यथ"/Respondent No . No. & िनधा"रण . वष" /A Y: 1 1992/Ahd/2016 Deputy Commissioner Vs Imperial Developers, Of Income Tax, . ‘Blossom’ Near Vesu Canal A.Y. 2013-14 Central Opp.Dps School, Circle-3, Surat – 395 Vesu, Surat. 001. [Pan: Aadfi 5694 R] िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By Shri Mehul Shah - Ca राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By Shri Srinivas T.Bidari – Sr.Dr

Business Income” without claiming any expanses, depreciation or set off of carry forward losses or any deduction under chapter VI-A and hence

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXAMPTION) WARD, SURAT vs. SHREE SAIBABA SATSANG MANDAL, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

business assets. In all such cases, section 32 of the Income-tax Act providing for depreciation for computation of income

DINESHBHAI JIVANBHAI SANSPARA,SURAT vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.435/Srt/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Physical Court Hearing) Dineshbhai Jivanbhai Sanspara The Principal Commissioner Of Income 1117,F-Tower, Green Avenue, Tax-1, Room No.123, Aayakar Vs. Union Park Gali Ghod Dod Bhawan, Majura Gate, Surat-395001 Road, Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Adaps 6038 H अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""थ" / Respondent

business consisting of export commission, income from house property, capital gains and income from other sources. The scrutiny assessment in the assessee’s case for AY 2013-14 was finalized, vide order u/s143(3) dated 14.03.2016, by accepting the returned income of Rs.34,91,530/-. 4.Subsequently, Ld. PCIT exercised his jurisdictional power u/s 263 of the Act. The Ld.PCIT

THE ACIT, NA vs. ARI CIRCLE, NAVSARI, NAVSARIVS.M/S OM SAI METAL , NAVSARI

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) The Assistant Commissioner Om Sai Metal, Of Income Tax, Navsari. Vansda Road, Village-Alipore, Vs Tal-Chikhli, Navsari. Pan: Aabfo 7092 H Appellant/ Revenue Respondent/ Assessee

depreciation of Rs24,19,250/- on trucks falling under block of asset ‘plant & machinery’ @ 30%. On further perusal of Profit and Loss Account, it was noted that assessee has shown income from Stone Quarry activity only and no income has been shown from renting/ hiring/ leasing activities of trucks. The trucks were wholly used for stone quarry business

VAPI GREEN ENVIRO LIMITED,VAPI vs. PCIT, VALSAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.582/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2014-15) (Hybrid Hearing) Vapi Green Enviro Limited, Vs. Pcit, 135, 1St Floor, Via House Gidc Char Valsad Rasta, Vapi – 396195, Gujarat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aaacv8289P (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Ms Arti N. Shah, Ca Respondent By Shri Ashish Pophare, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 30/06/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 12/08/2025

depreciation was not claimed from taxable income shown in the return of income and as such, it is held that once the expenses is not claimed as deduction, no disallowance is sustainable. 9. The Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Valsad has also erred in law and on facts by passing order u/s.263

KHODIYAR MOTORS,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shrisanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.729/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: 2013-14 (Hybrid Hearing) Khodiyar Motors Vs. Dcit, 1-2-3, Green Park, Surat Circle - 2(3), Navsari Road, Unn-Sachin, Surat Surat - 394230 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aaffk4882M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) िनधा"रतीकीओरसे/Appellant By Shri P. M. Jagasheth, Ca राज"कीओरसे /Respondent By Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 14/08/2025 उद्घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 11/11/2025

business or profession loss at Rs.12,19,451/-. However, as per the intimation u/s.143(1), the income was determined at Rs.62,73,189/-. There was a computational error in so far as the figure of depreciation