RUNI IMPEX,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3(2), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

section 143(3) rws 263 of the Act, even though it is capricious in nature and has been made ignoring the established and undisputed facts. The said order is contrary to the facts and circumstances of the case and the applicable provisions of the Act. GROUND NO.2 The learned CIT(A) erred in upholding the disallowance of claim of Rs.3

SAHEBSINGH RAWAT,VALSAD vs. ITO, WARD 8, VAPI

In the result, the delay in filing the appeal before this Tribunal is condoned

83 days, the Ld. CIT(A) held that there was a delay of 1,637 days, observing that no affidavit or supporting evidences were furnished in support of the condonation petition.\n3.1 Before us, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that several notices issued by the Ld. CIT(A) were sent to an incorrect e-mail address

ITO, WARD -2(3)(8), SURAT vs. SHRI MAYUR ASHESHBHAI JOSHI, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

condone the delay in these three appeals and admit these three appeals for hearing on merit. 19. Since, the issue involved in these remaining six cross-appeals are common and identical, therefore these appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a ITA Nos. 48, 62, 65 & 66/SRT/2019 &167 to 170/SRT/2021/AY.2013-14 Sonu Dharmichand Bafna & Others consolidated order is being passed

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -2(3)(8), SURAT vs. SHRI SONU DHARMICHAND BAFNA,, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

condone the delay in these three appeals and admit these three appeals for hearing on merit. 19. Since, the issue involved in these remaining six cross-appeals are common and identical, therefore these appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a ITA Nos. 48, 62, 65 & 66/SRT/2019 &167 to 170/SRT/2021/AY.2013-14 Sonu Dharmichand Bafna & Others consolidated order is being passed

VRAJENDRA JAGJIVANDAS THAKKAR PROP. OF ADITI EXPORTS,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WD- 2(3)(8), SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

condone the delay in these three appeals and admit these three appeals for hearing on merit. 19. Since, the issue involved in these remaining six cross-appeals are common and identical, therefore these appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a ITA Nos. 48, 62, 65 & 66/SRT/2019 &167 to 170/SRT/2021/AY.2013-14 Sonu Dharmichand Bafna & Others consolidated order is being passed

THE ITO, WARD-2(3)(8),, SURAT vs. SHRI VRAJENDRA JAGJIVANDAS THAKKAR,, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

condone the delay in these three appeals and admit these three appeals for hearing on merit. 19. Since, the issue involved in these remaining six cross-appeals are common and identical, therefore these appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a ITA Nos. 48, 62, 65 & 66/SRT/2019 &167 to 170/SRT/2021/AY.2013-14 Sonu Dharmichand Bafna & Others consolidated order is being passed

ITO, WARD 2(3)(8), SURAT vs. SHRI PARAG NARESHBHAI MEHTA, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

condone the delay in these three appeals and admit these three appeals for hearing on merit. 19. Since, the issue involved in these remaining six cross-appeals are common and identical, therefore these appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a ITA Nos. 48, 62, 65 & 66/SRT/2019 &167 to 170/SRT/2021/AY.2013-14 Sonu Dharmichand Bafna & Others consolidated order is being passed

MAYUR ASHESHBHAI JOSHI PROP. SHRUSHTI ENTERPRISE,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD, - 2(3)(8), SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

condone the delay in these three appeals and admit these three appeals for hearing on merit. 19. Since, the issue involved in these remaining six cross-appeals are common and identical, therefore these appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a ITA Nos. 48, 62, 65 & 66/SRT/2019 &167 to 170/SRT/2021/AY.2013-14 Sonu Dharmichand Bafna & Others consolidated order is being passed

PARAG NARESHBHAI MEHTA PROP. OF DEEKSHA TRADING ,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -2(3)(8), , SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

condone the delay in these three appeals and admit these three appeals for hearing on merit. 19. Since, the issue involved in these remaining six cross-appeals are common and identical, therefore these appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a ITA Nos. 48, 62, 65 & 66/SRT/2019 &167 to 170/SRT/2021/AY.2013-14 Sonu Dharmichand Bafna & Others consolidated order is being passed

SONU DHARMICHAND BAFNA PROP. OF BRIGHT DIAMONDS,SURATY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WD- 2(3)(8), SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

condone the delay in these three appeals and admit these three appeals for hearing on merit. 19. Since, the issue involved in these remaining six cross-appeals are common and identical, therefore these appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a ITA Nos. 48, 62, 65 & 66/SRT/2019 &167 to 170/SRT/2021/AY.2013-14 Sonu Dharmichand Bafna & Others consolidated order is being passed

MANOJKUMAR ISHWARBHAI PATEL,BARDOLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, , BARDOLI

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.710/Srt/2023 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2015-16) (Hybrid Hearing) Manojkumar Ishwarbhai Patel Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Bardoli, 2Nd Floor, Income Tax 2/917 Sahil Bungalow, Vs. Office, Bsnl Building, Station Vallabhwadi, Bardoli-394601 Road, Bardoli-394601 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bhlpp 2872 G (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’), dated 28.03.2023. 2. The grounds of appeal raised by assessee are as follows:- “1. That on facts and circumstances of case as well as law on subject the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the action of Assessing Office in assessing total income at Rs.56

CHINUBHAI VAGHJIBHAI SHETH,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-3(2)(2), SURAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.541 & 572/Srt/2019 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2011-12) (Physical Court Hearing) Income Tax Officer, Ward -3(2)(2), Chinubhai Vaghjibhai Sheth Room No. 416, Aayakar Bhavan, 16, Choksi Apartment, Shop Opp. Majura Gate, Surat-395001 Jain Temple, Katargam, Surat- 395004 Vs. Chinubhai Vaghjibhai Sheth Income Tax Officer, Ward- 16, Chokshi Apartment, Opp. Jain 3(2)(2), Aaykar Bhavan, Room Temple, Katargam, Surat-395004 4Th No. 416, Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, Majura Gate, Surat- 395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bpcps 0828 C (Appellant ) (Respondent)

83,889/- being 0.50% of the total credits in the bank account. 3. The assessee craves leave to alter, amend, delete, all or any ground of the appeal. 4. The business of the assessee was closed and the necessary papers were under collection. Therefore there is a delay. Your honour is requested to condone the delay.” 6. First, we shall

ITO, WARD 3(2)(2), SURAT vs. CHINUBHAI VAGHJIBHAI SHETH, SURAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.541 & 572/Srt/2019 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2011-12) (Physical Court Hearing) Income Tax Officer, Ward -3(2)(2), Chinubhai Vaghjibhai Sheth Room No. 416, Aayakar Bhavan, 16, Choksi Apartment, Shop Opp. Majura Gate, Surat-395001 Jain Temple, Katargam, Surat- 395004 Vs. Chinubhai Vaghjibhai Sheth Income Tax Officer, Ward- 16, Chokshi Apartment, Opp. Jain 3(2)(2), Aaykar Bhavan, Room Temple, Katargam, Surat-395004 4Th No. 416, Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, Majura Gate, Surat- 395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bpcps 0828 C (Appellant ) (Respondent)

83,889/- being 0.50% of the total credits in the bank account. 3. The assessee craves leave to alter, amend, delete, all or any ground of the appeal. 4. The business of the assessee was closed and the necessary papers were under collection. Therefore there is a delay. Your honour is requested to condone the delay.” 6. First, we shall

CHINUBHAI VAGHJIBHAI SHETH,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-3(2)(2), SURAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.541 & 572/Srt/2019 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2011-12) (Physical Court Hearing) Income Tax Officer, Ward -3(2)(2), Chinubhai Vaghjibhai Sheth Room No. 416, Aayakar Bhavan, 16, Choksi Apartment, Shop Opp. Majura Gate, Surat-395001 Jain Temple, Katargam, Surat- 395004 Vs. Chinubhai Vaghjibhai Sheth Income Tax Officer, Ward- 16, Chokshi Apartment, Opp. Jain 3(2)(2), Aaykar Bhavan, Room Temple, Katargam, Surat-395004 4Th No. 416, Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, Majura Gate, Surat- 395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bpcps 0828 C (Appellant ) (Respondent)

83,889/- being 0.50% of the total credits in the bank account. 3. The assessee craves leave to alter, amend, delete, all or any ground of the appeal. 4. The business of the assessee was closed and the necessary papers were under collection. Therefore there is a delay. Your honour is requested to condone the delay.” 6. First, we shall

SHRI JIVRAJBHAI KALUBHAI MIYANI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(3)(2), SURAT

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Physical Hearing) Shri Jivrajbhai Kalubhai Miyani, I.T.O., A/31, 32 Ramdevpir Nagar, Ward 3(3)(2), Vs. Varachha Road, Varachha, Surat. Surat-395006. Pan No. Aempm 3134 P Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Shri Laljibhai Kalubhai Miyani, I.T.O., 83, Shirdidham Society, Hira Ward 3(3)(5), Vs. Baug, Varachha Road, Surat. Surat-395006. Pan No. Ablpp 5096 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

83, Shirdidham Society, Hira Ward 3(3)(5), Vs. Baug, Varachha Road, Surat. Surat-395006. PAN No. ABLPP 5096 K Appellant/ assessee Respondent/ revenue Assessee represented by Shri Mitish S. Modi, CA Department represented by Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR Date of hearing 22/02/2023 Date of pronouncement 28/02/2023 Order under Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH

SHRI LALJIBHAI KALUBHAI MIYANI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(3)(5), SURAT

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Physical Hearing) Shri Jivrajbhai Kalubhai Miyani, I.T.O., A/31, 32 Ramdevpir Nagar, Ward 3(3)(2), Vs. Varachha Road, Varachha, Surat. Surat-395006. Pan No. Aempm 3134 P Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Shri Laljibhai Kalubhai Miyani, I.T.O., 83, Shirdidham Society, Hira Ward 3(3)(5), Vs. Baug, Varachha Road, Surat. Surat-395006. Pan No. Ablpp 5096 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

83, Shirdidham Society, Hira Ward 3(3)(5), Vs. Baug, Varachha Road, Surat. Surat-395006. PAN No. ABLPP 5096 K Appellant/ assessee Respondent/ revenue Assessee represented by Shri Mitish S. Modi, CA Department represented by Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR Date of hearing 22/02/2023 Date of pronouncement 28/02/2023 Order under Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH

RANJITLAL CHHAGANLAL SHAH,NA vs. ARIVS.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4, NAVSARI

Section 55A of the Act, the position of law only allowed the department to enhance the fair market value as on 01/4/1981. Hence, the learned CIT(A) ought to have accepted the report of the registered valuer given by the assessee. 4. The appellant craves leave to add, alter or vary any of the grounds of appeal.” Ranjitlal Chhaganlal Shah

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VAPI vs. RADHA MADHAV ECO INDUSTRIAL PARK, VAPI

condone the delay and admit the appeal for hearing.\n7. The Id. AR of the assessee did not press ground No.4 in ITA No. 41/SRT/2024, the same is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.\n8. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a partnership firm engaged in the business of real estate development. It belongs to the Laxminarayan