BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 481clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka102Mumbai43Chennai42Delhi40Kolkata27Cuttack15Bangalore12Jaipur11Hyderabad11Ahmedabad9Visakhapatnam5Chandigarh5Surat4Cochin4Panaji3Telangana3Pune3Patna2Lucknow2SC2Andhra Pradesh1Dehradun1Amritsar1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 254(1)4Section 1474Section 1484Reopening of Assessment4Addition to Income4Condonation of Delay4Set Off of Losses4

RAMESH P. MEHTA HUF,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 479/SRT/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Oct 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh

Section 147Section 148Section 254(1)

481 & 482/Srt/2023 (Assessment Years 2011-12 to 2014-15) (Hybrid hearing) Ramesh P. Mehta HUF, I.T.O., 104, Raj Anand Apartment, Faliyu, Ward 3(2)(1), Vs. Katargam, Surat-393004. Surat. PAN No. AAKHR 6564 G Appellant/ assessee Respondent/ revenue Assessee represented by Ms. Chaitali Shah, CA Department represented by Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR Date of Institution of Appeals 14/07/2023

RAMESH P. MEHTA HUF,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD3(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 480/SRT/2023[2012-13]Status: Disposed
ITAT Surat
26 Oct 2023
AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh

Section 147Section 148Section 254(1)

481 & 482/Srt/2023 (Assessment Years 2011-12 to 2014-15) (Hybrid hearing) Ramesh P. Mehta HUF, I.T.O., 104, Raj Anand Apartment, Faliyu, Ward 3(2)(1), Vs. Katargam, Surat-393004. Surat. PAN No. AAKHR 6564 G Appellant/ assessee Respondent/ revenue Assessee represented by Ms. Chaitali Shah, CA Department represented by Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR Date of Institution of Appeals 14/07/2023

RAMESH P. MEHTA HUF,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 481/SRT/2023[201-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Oct 2023

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh

Section 147Section 148Section 254(1)

481 & 482/Srt/2023 (Assessment Years 2011-12 to 2014-15) (Hybrid hearing) Ramesh P. Mehta HUF, I.T.O., 104, Raj Anand Apartment, Faliyu, Ward 3(2)(1), Vs. Katargam, Surat-393004. Surat. PAN No. AAKHR 6564 G Appellant/ assessee Respondent/ revenue Assessee represented by Ms. Chaitali Shah, CA Department represented by Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR Date of Institution of Appeals 14/07/2023

RAMESH P. MEHTA HUF,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 482/SRT/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Oct 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh

Section 147Section 148Section 254(1)

481 & 482/Srt/2023 (Assessment Years 2011-12 to 2014-15) (Hybrid hearing) Ramesh P. Mehta HUF, I.T.O., 104, Raj Anand Apartment, Faliyu, Ward 3(2)(1), Vs. Katargam, Surat-393004. Surat. PAN No. AAKHR 6564 G Appellant/ assessee Respondent/ revenue Assessee represented by Ms. Chaitali Shah, CA Department represented by Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR Date of Institution of Appeals 14/07/2023