Search: condonation of delay

65 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 36(1)(v)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Addition to Income50 Section 143(1)49 Section 143(3)42 Condonation of Delay39 Disallowance21 Section 12A20 Limitation/Time-bar20 Section 14819 Section 68

SHREE LAXMINARAYAN SYNTHETICS,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee, are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 202/SRT/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Surat31 Mar 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.147 & 234/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2018-19 To 2019-20) (Virtual Court Hearing) Rekha R. Shokla, Vs. The Dcit, Cpc, G-3, Deepanjali Appartment, Sai Bangalore. Krupa Society, No.4-Airport Road, Nani Daman. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bgyps2563M (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.150/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19) Riddhi Siddhi Prints Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Dcit, Cpc, 75-1 & 75-2, Gidc, Pandesara, Bangalore. Surat-394221, Gujarat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaccr7050C (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.160/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2019-20) Chinco Textiles, Vs. The Acit, Cpc, Plot No.104, Road No.7, Gidc Bangalore. Sachin, Surat-394230. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaefc0028N (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.201 & 202/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2018-19 To 2019-20) Shree Laxminarayan Synthetics, Vs. The Dcit, Circle-2(1)(1), Plot No.275/2, Gidc, Pandesara, Surat. Surat, Gujarat-394221. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aakfs5319N (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.224 & 225/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19 To 2019-20) Tirupati Prints, Vs. The Adit, Cpc, S. No.207, Plot No.37 To 40, Bangalore. Bamroli Taluka: Choryasi, Surat-394221, Gujarat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aabft4240J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(1)Section 36

condone the delay and admit assessee`s appeal for adjudication on merits. 5. The facts of the case which can be stated quite shortly are as follows. In all these ten appeals, the solitary issue involved is that assessees have not deposited employees contribution to provident fund and ESI within the time limit allowed under the Act. Therefore, Assessing Officer

Showing 1–20 of 65 · Page 1 of 4

SHREE LAXMINARAYAN SYNTHETICS,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT

SHREE LAXMINARAYAN SYNTHETICS,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT

CHINCO TEXTILES,SURAT vs. ASSTT. DIRETOR OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL PROCESSING CENTRE(CPC), BENGALURU

REKHA R. SHUKLA,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC, BANGLURU

REKHA R SHUKLA,NANI DAMAN vs. DCIT,CPC,BANGLURU, BANGAALURU

RIDDHI SIDDHI PRINTS PVT LTD.,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGULURU

TIRUPATI PRINTS,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

TIRUPATI PRINTS,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

U. P. SINGH AND CO.,SURAT vs. CIT(A), NFAC, DELHI

ZENITEX,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

LAXMINARAYAN SYNTHETICS,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT

SHRI MOHANBHAI D. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-9(3),, SURAT

M/S. SAMARTH INDIA,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, OSD-1, RANGE-2,, SURAT

M/S. SAMARTH INDIA,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, OSD-1, RANGE-2,, SURAT

M/S. LAKHANI IMPEX,,SURAT vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4,, SURAT

SHREYANSH CORPORATION,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, OSD-1, RANGE-2,, SURAT

SHREYANSH CORPORATION,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, OSD-1, RANGE-2,, SURAT

SHRI MOHANBHAI D. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-9(3),, SURAT

M/S. LAKHANI IMPEX,,SURAT vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4,, SURAT

M/S. SHREYA IMPEX,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2),, SURAT

SHRI MOHANBHAI D. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-9(3),, SURAT