Search: condonation of delay

113 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 36(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Addition to Income72 Condonation of Delay65 Section 143(1)55 Section 143(3)49 Section 14835 Limitation/Time-bar35 Section 14732 Disallowance30 Section 254(1)

CHINCO TEXTILES,SURAT vs. ASSTT. DIRETOR OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL PROCESSING CENTRE(CPC), BENGALURU

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee, are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 160/SRT/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Surat31 Mar 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.147 & 234/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2018-19 To 2019-20) (Virtual Court Hearing) Rekha R. Shokla, Vs. The Dcit, Cpc, G-3, Deepanjali Appartment, Sai Bangalore. Krupa Society, No.4-Airport Road, Nani Daman. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bgyps2563M (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.150/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19) Riddhi Siddhi Prints Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Dcit, Cpc, 75-1 & 75-2, Gidc, Pandesara, Bangalore. Surat-394221, Gujarat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaccr7050C (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.160/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2019-20) Chinco Textiles, Vs. The Acit, Cpc, Plot No.104, Road No.7, Gidc Bangalore. Sachin, Surat-394230. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaefc0028N (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.201 & 202/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2018-19 To 2019-20) Shree Laxminarayan Synthetics, Vs. The Dcit, Circle-2(1)(1), Plot No.275/2, Gidc, Pandesara, Surat. Surat, Gujarat-394221. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aakfs5319N (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.224 & 225/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19 To 2019-20) Tirupati Prints, Vs. The Adit, Cpc, S. No.207, Plot No.37 To 40, Bangalore. Bamroli Taluka: Choryasi, Surat-394221, Gujarat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aabft4240J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(1)Section 36

section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”). 2. Since, the issues involved in all the appeals are common and identical, therefore these appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a consolidated order is being passed for the sake of convenience and brevity. The facts as well as ground of appeal narrated

Showing 1–20 of 113 · Page 1 of 6

CHINCO TEXTILES,SURAT vs. ASSTT. DIRETOR OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL PROCESSING CENTRE(CPC), BENGALURU

CHINCO TEXTILES,SURAT vs. ASSTT. DIRETOR OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL PROCESSING CENTRE(CPC), BENGALURU

TIRUPATI PRINTS,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

RIDDHI SIDDHI PRINTS PVT LTD.,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGULURU

REKHA R SHUKLA,NANI DAMAN vs. DCIT,CPC,BANGLURU, BANGAALURU

TIRUPATI PRINTS,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

SHREE LAXMINARAYAN SYNTHETICS,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT

REKHA R. SHUKLA,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC, BANGLURU

U. P. SINGH AND CO.,SURAT vs. CIT(A), NFAC, DELHI

ZENITEX,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

LAXMINARAYAN SYNTHETICS,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT

M/S. SAMARTH INDIA,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, OSD-1, RANGE-2,, SURAT

SHREYANSH CORPORATION,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, OSD-1, RANGE-2,, SURAT

SHRI MOHANBHAI D. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-9(3),, SURAT

SHREYANSH CORPORATION,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, OSD-1, RANGE-2,, SURAT

M/S. LAKHANI IMPEX,,SURAT vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4,, SURAT

SHRI MOHANBHAI D. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-9(3),, SURAT

M/S. LAKHANI IMPEX,,SURAT vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4,, SURAT

M/S. SAMARTH INDIA,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, OSD-1, RANGE-2,, SURAT

M/S. SHREYA IMPEX,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2),, SURAT

SHRI MOHANBHAI D. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-9(3),, SURAT