Search: condonation of delay

104 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 36(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Addition to Income70 Condonation of Delay59 Section 143(1)56 Section 143(3)54 Section 14844 Limitation/Time-bar42 Section 14736 Disallowance33 Section 254(1)

REKHA R. SHUKLA,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC, BANGLURU

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee, are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 234/SRT/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Surat31 Mar 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.147 & 234/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2018-19 To 2019-20) (Virtual Court Hearing) Rekha R. Shokla, Vs. The Dcit, Cpc, G-3, Deepanjali Appartment, Sai Bangalore. Krupa Society, No.4-Airport Road, Nani Daman. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bgyps2563M (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.150/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19) Riddhi Siddhi Prints Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Dcit, Cpc, 75-1 & 75-2, Gidc, Pandesara, Bangalore. Surat-394221, Gujarat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaccr7050C (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.160/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2019-20) Chinco Textiles, Vs. The Acit, Cpc, Plot No.104, Road No.7, Gidc Bangalore. Sachin, Surat-394230. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaefc0028N (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.201 & 202/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2018-19 To 2019-20) Shree Laxminarayan Synthetics, Vs. The Dcit, Circle-2(1)(1), Plot No.275/2, Gidc, Pandesara, Surat. Surat, Gujarat-394221. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aakfs5319N (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.224 & 225/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19 To 2019-20) Tirupati Prints, Vs. The Adit, Cpc, S. No.207, Plot No.37 To 40, Bangalore. Bamroli Taluka: Choryasi, Surat-394221, Gujarat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aabft4240J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(1)Section 36

section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”). 2. Since, the issues involved in all the appeals are common and identical, therefore these appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a consolidated order is being passed for the sake of convenience and brevity. The facts as well as ground of appeal narrated

Showing 1–20 of 104 · Page 1 of 6

REKHA R. SHUKLA,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC, BANGLURU

REKHA R. SHUKLA,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC, BANGLURU

REKHA R SHUKLA,NANI DAMAN vs. DCIT,CPC,BANGLURU, BANGAALURU

RIDDHI SIDDHI PRINTS PVT LTD.,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGULURU

CHINCO TEXTILES,SURAT vs. ASSTT. DIRETOR OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL PROCESSING CENTRE(CPC), BENGALURU

SHREE LAXMINARAYAN SYNTHETICS,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT

TIRUPATI PRINTS,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

TIRUPATI PRINTS,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

U. P. SINGH AND CO.,SURAT vs. CIT(A), NFAC, DELHI

LAXMINARAYAN SYNTHETICS,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT

ZENITEX,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

NAVBHARAT CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, , BHARUCH

NAVBHARAT CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, , BHARUCH

NAVBHARAT CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, , BHARUCH

NAVBHARAT CHERITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BHARUCH

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT, SURAT vs. DHANPRIYA PRINTS PVT. LTD.,, SURAT

BETEX INDIA LIMITED,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT vs. BETEX INDIA LIMITED, SURAT

SALONI ENGINEERING WORKS,VAPI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-8, VAPI

VYASHKUMAR INDRALAL MISHRA,SILVASSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 7, VAPI

BHAVIN ARUNBHAI PATEL,VALSAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, VAPI