VANMALIBHAI MULJIBHAI PATEL L/H RANJANBEN DEEPAKBHAI PATEL,NA vs. ARIVS.ITO, WARD 5, NAVSARI
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 345/SRT/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 Dec 2025AY 2011-12
Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.345/Srt/2025 Assessment Year: (2011-12) (Hybrid Hearing) Vanmalibhai Muljibhai Patel, Vs. Ito, L/H Of Ranjanben Deepakbhai Patel Ward - 5, 16, Shrinikunj Society, Ashabaug, Navsari Navsari - 396445 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Abjpp3114G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) Appellant By Shri Suresh K. Kabra, Ca Respondent By Ms. Jayshree Thakur, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 23/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 04/12/2025
Section 127Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 250Section 251(1)Section 271(1)(c)
condoned the delay of 119 days and admitted the appeal for hearing on merit. The appellant challenged to re-opening notice and re- assessment proceedings before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) referred to the decisions of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Anshul Jain vs. Pr. CIT, (2022)
143 taxmann.com 38 (SC) and decision of Hon’ble Allahabad
