Search: condonation of delay

25 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 275(1)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(1)46 Addition to Income21 Limitation/Time-bar14 Condonation of Delay13 Section 271D12 Disallowance12 Section 143(3)10 Section 3610 TDS

TIRUPATI PRINTS,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee, are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 224/SRT/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat31 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.147 & 234/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2018-19 To 2019-20) (Virtual Court Hearing) Rekha R. Shokla, Vs. The Dcit, Cpc, G-3, Deepanjali Appartment, Sai Bangalore. Krupa Society, No.4-Airport Road, Nani Daman. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bgyps2563M (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.150/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19) Riddhi Siddhi Prints Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Dcit, Cpc, 75-1 & 75-2, Gidc, Pandesara, Bangalore. Surat-394221, Gujarat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaccr7050C (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.160/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2019-20) Chinco Textiles, Vs. The Acit, Cpc, Plot No.104, Road No.7, Gidc Bangalore. Sachin, Surat-394230. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaefc0028N (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.201 & 202/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2018-19 To 2019-20) Shree Laxminarayan Synthetics, Vs. The Dcit, Circle-2(1)(1), Plot No.275/2, Gidc, Pandesara, Surat. Surat, Gujarat-394221. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aakfs5319N (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.224 & 225/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19 To 2019-20) Tirupati Prints, Vs. The Adit, Cpc, S. No.207, Plot No.37 To 40, Bangalore. Bamroli Taluka: Choryasi, Surat-394221, Gujarat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aabft4240J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(1)Section 36

condone the delay and admit assessee`s appeal for adjudication on merits. 5. The facts of the case which can be stated quite shortly are as follows. In all these ten appeals, the solitary issue involved is that assessees have not deposited employees contribution to provident fund and ESI within the time limit allowed under the Act. Therefore, Assessing Officer

Showing 1–20 of 25 · Page 1 of 2

TIRUPATI PRINTS,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

TIRUPATI PRINTS,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

RIDDHI SIDDHI PRINTS PVT LTD.,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGULURU

REKHA R SHUKLA,NANI DAMAN vs. DCIT,CPC,BANGLURU, BANGAALURU

TIRUPATI PRINTS,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

CHINCO TEXTILES,SURAT vs. ASSTT. DIRETOR OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL PROCESSING CENTRE(CPC), BENGALURU

REKHA R. SHUKLA,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC, BANGLURU

SHREE LAXMINARAYAN SYNTHETICS,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT

U. P. SINGH AND CO.,SURAT vs. CIT(A), NFAC, DELHI

ZENITEX,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

LAXMINARAYAN SYNTHETICS,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT

SALONI ENGINEERING WORKS,VAPI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-8, VAPI

VYASHKUMAR INDRALAL MISHRA,SILVASSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 7, VAPI

ANAND MAHENDRA KAPADIA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(1), SURAT

ANAND MAHENDRA KAPADIA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(1), SURAT

ALPESH UMESHCHANDRA,SURAT vs. ITO WARD-1(2) (1), SURAT

TARIT F. DAS,BHARUCH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIR.1, BHARUCH

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BHARUCH CIRCLE-1, BHARUCH vs. M/S. MEGA AIMS, BHARUCH

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BHARUCH CIRCLE-1, BHARUCH vs. M/S. MEGA AIMS, BHARUCH

M/S. MEGA AIMS,BHARUCH vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, BHARUCH

M/S. MEGA AIMS,BHARUCH vs. ITO, WARD-1(3), BHARUCH