BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

29 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 272clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka121Chennai78Mumbai73Nagpur54Kolkata48Raipur45Delhi44Amritsar37Surat29Panaji29Bangalore27Cuttack26Hyderabad23Jaipur18Pune12Lucknow9Ahmedabad9Visakhapatnam9Cochin8Calcutta6Indore5Chandigarh5Patna3Rajkot3SC2Jodhpur1Allahabad1Andhra Pradesh1Agra1Rajasthan1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(b)49Section 142(1)30Section 143(3)25Section 153A21Penalty18Addition to Income14Limitation/Time-bar12Section 254(1)9Section 272A(1)(d)

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -2(3)(8), SURAT vs. SHRI SONU DHARMICHAND BAFNA,, SURAT

In the result the ground No

ITA 48/SRT/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

Section 143(3)

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. At the outset, Learned Counsel for the assessee, informs the Bench that appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No.65/SRT/2019 for AY.2013-14, in the case of Shri Parag Nareshbhai Mehta, is not maintainable in the eye of law as the tax effect involved

ITO, WARD -2(3)(8), SURAT vs. SHRI MAYUR ASHESHBHAI JOSHI, SURAT

In the result the ground No

ITA 66/SRT/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

Showing 1–20 of 29 · Page 1 of 2

9
Section 1327
Section 2747
Search & Seizure7
Section 143(3)

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. At the outset, Learned Counsel for the assessee, informs the Bench that appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No.65/SRT/2019 for AY.2013-14, in the case of Shri Parag Nareshbhai Mehta, is not maintainable in the eye of law as the tax effect involved

THE ITO, WARD-2(3)(8),, SURAT vs. SHRI VRAJENDRA JAGJIVANDAS THAKKAR,, SURAT

In the result the ground No

ITA 62/SRT/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

Section 143(3)

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. At the outset, Learned Counsel for the assessee, informs the Bench that appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No.65/SRT/2019 for AY.2013-14, in the case of Shri Parag Nareshbhai Mehta, is not maintainable in the eye of law as the tax effect involved

VRAJENDRA JAGJIVANDAS THAKKAR PROP. OF ADITI EXPORTS,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WD- 2(3)(8), SURAT

In the result the ground No

ITA 168/SRT/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

Section 143(3)

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. At the outset, Learned Counsel for the assessee, informs the Bench that appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No.65/SRT/2019 for AY.2013-14, in the case of Shri Parag Nareshbhai Mehta, is not maintainable in the eye of law as the tax effect involved

MAYUR ASHESHBHAI JOSHI PROP. SHRUSHTI ENTERPRISE,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD, - 2(3)(8), SURAT

In the result the ground No

ITA 170/SRT/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

Section 143(3)

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. At the outset, Learned Counsel for the assessee, informs the Bench that appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No.65/SRT/2019 for AY.2013-14, in the case of Shri Parag Nareshbhai Mehta, is not maintainable in the eye of law as the tax effect involved

SONU DHARMICHAND BAFNA PROP. OF BRIGHT DIAMONDS,SURATY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WD- 2(3)(8), SURAT

In the result the ground No

ITA 167/SRT/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

Section 143(3)

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. At the outset, Learned Counsel for the assessee, informs the Bench that appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No.65/SRT/2019 for AY.2013-14, in the case of Shri Parag Nareshbhai Mehta, is not maintainable in the eye of law as the tax effect involved

PARAG NARESHBHAI MEHTA PROP. OF DEEKSHA TRADING ,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -2(3)(8), , SURAT

In the result the ground No

ITA 169/SRT/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

Section 143(3)

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. At the outset, Learned Counsel for the assessee, informs the Bench that appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No.65/SRT/2019 for AY.2013-14, in the case of Shri Parag Nareshbhai Mehta, is not maintainable in the eye of law as the tax effect involved

ITO, WARD 2(3)(8), SURAT vs. SHRI PARAG NARESHBHAI MEHTA, SURAT

In the result the ground No

ITA 65/SRT/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

Section 143(3)

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. At the outset, Learned Counsel for the assessee, informs the Bench that appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No.65/SRT/2019 for AY.2013-14, in the case of Shri Parag Nareshbhai Mehta, is not maintainable in the eye of law as the tax effect involved

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT, SURAT vs. DHANPRIYA PRINTS PVT. LTD.,, SURAT

In the result, Ground No. 4 to 6 raised by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 52/SRT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, CAFor Respondent: Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

condone these minor delays in filing appeals and admit these three appeals for hearing on merit. 4. Although, these appeals filed by the Assessee and Revenue, contain multiple grounds of appeals. However, at the time of hearing, we have carefully perused all the grounds raised by the Revenue as well as by the Assessee. We note that most

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT vs. BETEX INDIA LIMITED, SURAT

In the result, Ground No. 4 to 6 raised by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 174/SRT/2021[2008-9]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Dec 2022

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, CAFor Respondent: Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

condone these minor delays in filing appeals and admit these three appeals for hearing on merit. 4. Although, these appeals filed by the Assessee and Revenue, contain multiple grounds of appeals. However, at the time of hearing, we have carefully perused all the grounds raised by the Revenue as well as by the Assessee. We note that most

BETEX INDIA LIMITED,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT

In the result, Ground No. 4 to 6 raised by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 171/SRT/2021[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Dec 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble Accountnat Member (Physical Court Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, CAFor Respondent: Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

condone these minor delays in filing appeals and admit these three appeals for hearing on merit. 4. Although, these appeals filed by the Assessee and Revenue, contain multiple grounds of appeals. However, at the time of hearing, we have carefully perused all the grounds raised by the Revenue as well as by the Assessee. We note that most

SANDIPBHAI JAMIYATBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. ITO WARD-1, BARDOLI

In the result, assessee’s appeal ITA No

ITA 917/SRT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat19 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.916 & 917/Srt/2024 (Ay 2017-18) (Physical Court Hearing) Sandipbhai Jamiyatbhai Patel Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, At Post Piparia, Tal. Mandvi, Bardoli, Room # 05, Income बनाम Surat-394 104 Tax Office, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs [Pan : Bvgpp 0297 N] Opp. Jalaram Mandir, Station Road, Bardoli-394 601 अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent

Section 144Section 254(1)Section 272A(1)(d)

condonation of delay is acceptable one. We find one more reason that ld CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of assessee without issuing notice under section 250 of Income Tax Act. Hence, the order passed by ld CIT(A) is set aside. Considering the facts that both the lower authorities passed order ex-parte, hence, the additions made in the assessment

SANDIPBHAI JAMIYABHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1, BARDOLI

In the result, assessee’s appeal ITA No

ITA 916/SRT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat19 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.916 & 917/Srt/2024 (Ay 2017-18) (Physical Court Hearing) Sandipbhai Jamiyatbhai Patel Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, At Post Piparia, Tal. Mandvi, Bardoli, Room # 05, Income बनाम Surat-394 104 Tax Office, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs [Pan : Bvgpp 0297 N] Opp. Jalaram Mandir, Station Road, Bardoli-394 601 अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent

Section 144Section 254(1)Section 272A(1)(d)

condonation of delay is acceptable one. We find one more reason that ld CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of assessee without issuing notice under section 250 of Income Tax Act. Hence, the order passed by ld CIT(A) is set aside. Considering the facts that both the lower authorities passed order ex-parte, hence, the additions made in the assessment

JANANI EXPORTS,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, all seven appeals filed by the assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 401/SRT/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 Aug 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble(Physical Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Respondent byFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(b)

condone the delay and admit the appeals for hearing. 3. Since, the issue involved in all these appeals, are common and identical, therefore these appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a consolidated order is being passed for the sake of convenience and brevity. The facts as well as the grounds narrated in ITA No.399/SRT/2023 for AY.2013-14 have been

JANANI EXPORTS,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, all seven appeals filed by the assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 400/SRT/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble(Physical Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Respondent byFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(b)

condone the delay and admit the appeals for hearing. 3. Since, the issue involved in all these appeals, are common and identical, therefore these appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a consolidated order is being passed for the sake of convenience and brevity. The facts as well as the grounds narrated in ITA No.399/SRT/2023 for AY.2013-14 have been

JANANI EXPORTS,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, all seven appeals filed by the assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 403/SRT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 Aug 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble(Physical Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Respondent byFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(b)

condone the delay and admit the appeals for hearing. 3. Since, the issue involved in all these appeals, are common and identical, therefore these appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a consolidated order is being passed for the sake of convenience and brevity. The facts as well as the grounds narrated in ITA No.399/SRT/2023 for AY.2013-14 have been

JANANI EXPORTS,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, all seven appeals filed by the assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 404/SRT/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble(Physical Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Respondent byFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(b)

condone the delay and admit the appeals for hearing. 3. Since, the issue involved in all these appeals, are common and identical, therefore these appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a consolidated order is being passed for the sake of convenience and brevity. The facts as well as the grounds narrated in ITA No.399/SRT/2023 for AY.2013-14 have been

JANANI EXPORTS,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, all seven appeals filed by the assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 405/SRT/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 Aug 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble(Physical Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Respondent byFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(b)

condone the delay and admit the appeals for hearing. 3. Since, the issue involved in all these appeals, are common and identical, therefore these appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a consolidated order is being passed for the sake of convenience and brevity. The facts as well as the grounds narrated in ITA No.399/SRT/2023 for AY.2013-14 have been

JANANI EXPORTS,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, all seven appeals filed by the assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 399/SRT/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble(Physical Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Respondent byFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(b)

condone the delay and admit the appeals for hearing. 3. Since, the issue involved in all these appeals, are common and identical, therefore these appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a consolidated order is being passed for the sake of convenience and brevity. The facts as well as the grounds narrated in ITA No.399/SRT/2023 for AY.2013-14 have been

JANANI EXPORTS,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, all seven appeals filed by the assessee (in ITA Nos

ITA 402/SRT/2023[2016-17 (Quarter-1)-(24Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 Aug 2023

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble(Physical Hearing) Sl.

For Appellant: Respondent byFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(b)

condone the delay and admit the appeals for hearing. 3. Since, the issue involved in all these appeals, are common and identical, therefore these appeals have been clubbed and heard together and a consolidated order is being passed for the sake of convenience and brevity. The facts as well as the grounds narrated in ITA No.399/SRT/2023 for AY.2013-14 have been