BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 271Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune28Karnataka21Delhi20Jaipur14Kolkata14Ahmedabad11Mumbai11Bangalore9Hyderabad7Chennai6Cochin6Visakhapatnam5Indore4Chandigarh4Rajkot4Amritsar2Surat2Guwahati1SC1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 271D12Section 269S4Section 1482Section 143(3)2Penalty2Reassessment2Addition to Income2Natural Justice2Limitation/Time-bar

ANAND MAHENDRA KAPADIA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(1), SURAT

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are hereby allowed

ITA 710/SRT/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Nov 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Bijayananda Pruseth (Accountant Member)

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 269SSection 271D

section 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2009-10. I.T.A No. 709 & 710//SRT/2025 A.Y. 2009-10 Page No 2 Anand Mahendra Kapadia vs. ITO 2. The registry has noted that there is delay of 91 days in filing the above appeals. The assessee submitted that

ANAND MAHENDRA KAPADIA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(1), SURAT

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are hereby allowed

2
ITA 709/SRT/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Nov 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Bijayananda Pruseth (Accountant Member)

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 269SSection 271D

section 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2009-10. I.T.A No. 709 & 710//SRT/2025 A.Y. 2009-10 Page No 2 Anand Mahendra Kapadia vs. ITO 2. The registry has noted that there is delay of 91 days in filing the above appeals. The assessee submitted that