BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 269Tclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune24Hyderabad11Mumbai9Kolkata9Ahmedabad9Visakhapatnam9Delhi7Cochin6Chennai4Lucknow4Rajkot4Chandigarh3Surat3Bangalore3Indore2Amritsar2Jaipur2Nagpur1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 271D18Section 269S8Section 143(3)4Penalty3Limitation/Time-bar3Section 1482Reassessment2Addition to Income2Natural Justice

ANAND MAHENDRA KAPADIA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(1), SURAT

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are hereby allowed

ITA 710/SRT/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Nov 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Bijayananda Pruseth (Accountant Member)

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 269SSection 271D

delay of 91 days in filing the appeals and the same are hereby condoned. 2. Brief facts of the case is that the assessee is an individual filed his Return of Income on 12-09-2009 for the Asst. Year 2009-10 admitting income of Rs.3,84,460/-. Information received during the course of search in the case of M/s.Creative

ANAND MAHENDRA KAPADIA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(1), SURAT

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are hereby allowed

2
ITA 709/SRT/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Nov 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Bijayananda Pruseth (Accountant Member)

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 269SSection 271D

delay of 91 days in filing the appeals and the same are hereby condoned. 2. Brief facts of the case is that the assessee is an individual filed his Return of Income on 12-09-2009 for the Asst. Year 2009-10 admitting income of Rs.3,84,460/-. Information received during the course of search in the case of M/s.Creative

MUKESH DAHYABHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE -3(2), SURAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 150/SRT/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat20 Sept 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.150/Srt/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2010-11) (Virtual Court Hearing) Mukesh Dahyabhai Patel, Vs. The Jcit, Rang-3(2), Prop. Of Mukesh Textiles, P-414-417, Surat. New Gidc, Katargam, Surat-395004. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abbpp2226M (Assessee) (Respondent) Assessee By : Ms Himali Mistry, Ca Revenue By : Ms Anupama Singhla, Sr. Dr सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 27/08/2021 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 20/09/2021 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. A. L. Saini: Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee Pertaining To Assessment Year (Ay) 2010-11, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-3, Surat [In Short “The Ld. Cit(A)”] In Appeal No. Cas/3/453/2015-16 Dated 24.08.2017, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Assessment Order Passed By The Assessing Officer Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act 1961, (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”). 2. Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee Are As Follows: “(1) On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & As Per Law, The Learned Cit(A) Erred In Levying Penalty Of Rs.3,22,018/- U/S.271D Of The Act. (2) The Assessee Submits That The Learned Cit(A) Did Not Properly Appreciate The Real Nature Of Transactions & Therefore, Was Not Justified In Confirming The Above Penalty. (3)The Assessee Craves Leave To Add, Alter Or Vary Any Of The Grounds Of Appeal.”

For Appellant: Ms Himali Mistry, CAFor Respondent: Ms Anupama Singhla, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 271D

condone the delay and admit the appeal for hearing. 4. Succinct facts are that assessee before us is an individual and filed his return of income for A.Y. 2010-11, on 21.07.2010 declaring total income of Rs.5,30,420/-. The scrutiny assessment was finalized u/s 143(3) of the Act on 23.01.2013, determining total income at Rs.7