NAVBHARAT CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, , BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 383, 384 & 385/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi, Jhagadia, Ward-1, Vs. Bharuch. Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. These three appeals by the single assessee are directed against the separate orders of the learned National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC)/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short, the ld. CIT(A)], all dated 13/10/2022 for the Assessment years (AY) 2017-18 to 2019-20 respectively

NAVBHARAT CHERITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BHARUCH

In the result, all these three appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Physical Hearing) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi Jhagadia, Bharuch, Ward-1, Vs. Gujarat, Pin-393115 Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC)/learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (in short, the ld. CIT(A) dated 13/12/2022 for the Assessment year (AY) 2016-17. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal

BASANT SEKHANI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. These two appeals by the assessee are directed against the separate orders of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC)/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), (in short, the ld. CIT(A)) both dated 04/08/2023 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2010-11. In ITA No. 584/Srt/2023 the assessee has challenged

BASANT SEKHANI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. These two appeals by the assessee are directed against the separate orders of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC)/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), (in short, the ld. CIT(A)) both dated 04/08/2023 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2010-11. In ITA No. 584/Srt/2023 the assessee has challenged

MAHAVIR EDUCATION TRUST,SURAT vs. ADDITIONAL CIT CPC/ JURISDICTIONAL A.O. EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT, BENGALURU/SURAT

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Physical Hearing) Mahavir Educational Trust, Addl.C.I.T., 6/1020, Opp. Jay Jalaram Khaman, C.P.C. Bangalore, Vs. Balaji Road, Nani Chhipwad, Gopipura, Surat-395001. (Gujarat) Jurisdictional A.O. Pan No. Aaatn 4014 C Exemption Ward, Surat. Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC)/learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short, the ld. CIT(A)] dated 07/06/2023 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2020-21. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal

JANVI THREAD PRIVATE LIMTED,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(1)(3), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

condoning the delay of 172 days, the Tribunal imposed a cost of Rs. 2000/- per appeal due to non-compliance before the lower authorities.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": ["Section 147", "Section 144", "Section 254

VIJAYBHAI BOOKBINDER,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD- 3(2)(10), SURAT

In the result, ground No. 2 of the\nappeal is allowed and ground No

delay fell within the period condoned by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "69A", "144", "254(1)", "249(3)", "250(1)", "119(2)(b)" ], "issues

BAIJNATH GOEL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1339/Srt/2024 (Ay 2017-18) (Physical Court Hearing) Baijnath Goel Income Tax Officer, Ward- 701, Prayag Residency, Parle Point, 1(2)(1), Surat, Room # 116, बनाम B/H Sargam Shopping Centre, 1St Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, Vs Surat-395 007 Majura Gate, Opp. New Civil [Pan : Afipg 6263 N] Hospital, Surat-395 001 अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [for short to as “NFAC/Ld.CIT(A)] dated 21.09.2023 for assessment year (AY) 2017-18, which in turn arises out of assessment order passed by Assessing Officer under section 144 of the Income

GHANSHYAM K KEVADIYA HUF,SURAT vs. ITO-1(3)(6), SURAT

In the result, the ground of appeal raised in this\nappeal is allowed

sections": [ "254(1)", "147", "148", "144", "271(1)(c)", "44AD", "250" ], "issues": "Whether the delay in filing the appeals should be condoned

GAHNSHYAM K KEVADIYA HUF,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1(3)(6), SURAT

In the result, the ground of appeal raised in this\nappeal is allowed

254(1) of Income Tax Act\nPER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:\n1. These two appeals by assessee are directed against the separate orders of\nNational Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi /Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)\n[for short to as “Ld.CIT(A)"] dated 20.11.2023 and 23.11.2023, one appeal in\nagainst quantum assessment and other in penalty levied under section\n271

SHREE SALABATPURA URBAN CO-OP[. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE - 2(1)(1), SURAT

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Virtual Hearing) Shree Salabatpura Urban Co. Op. D.C.I.T. Credit Society Limited, Circle-2(1)(1), Vs. 4/2424, Salabatpura Main Road, Surat. Salabatpura, Surat-395003. Pan No. Aaaas 3509 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC)/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), (in short, the ld. CIT(A)) dated 06/08/2022 for the Assessment year (AY) 2015-16 wherein the assessee has raised following grounds of appeal

SHRI PARESH K. SORATHIYA,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-3(2)(3),, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Sainiआ.अ.सं./Ita No.342/Srt/2018 (Ay 2009-10) (Hearing In Physical Court) Shri Paresh Sorathiya Income Tax Officer 195, Ambica Nagar No.2, Aaykar Bhavan, Majura Vs Opp. Arogya Kendra, Gate, Surat-395001 Katargam Road, Surat Pan : Axbps 9579 C अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of learned Commissioner of Income tax(Appeals)-3,Valsad [for short to as ‘Ld. CIT(A)’] dated 20.08.2015, which in turn arises against the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Income

SHRI NATWAR R BHARDWAJ,,SURAT vs. ITO WARD-1(2) (3), SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Sainiआ.अ.सं./Ita No.1718/Ahd/2017 (Ay 2012-13) (Hearing In Physical Court) Shri Natwar R Bhardwaj Income Tax Officer Ward-1(2)(3), Aaykar 310, Chandanvan Vs Bhavan, Majura Gate, Apartment, B/S Children Surat Hospital, Majura Gate, Surat Pan No. Afvpb 0248 K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-2 Surat [for short to as “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 02.01.2017 for the assessment year 2012-13, which in turn arises out of assessment order passed by Assessing Officer under section

GANI MOHAMMAD POPAT,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-3, VAPI

In the result, grounds No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Virtual Hearing) Popat Yasin Abdulganibhai, I.T.O., Son & L/H Of Late Gani Mohammad Ward-3, Vs. Popat, Vapi. Bombay Market, Zanda Chowk, Near S.T. Bus Depot, Vapi. Pan No. Akvpp 0747 J Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Valsad (in short, the ld. CIT(A)) dated 10/05/2016 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2007-08. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: “1. The learned Commissioner of Income

RAMESH P. MEHTA HUF,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh

Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This group of four appeals by the assessee are directed against the separate orders of learned National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (in Short NFAC)/learned Commissioner of Income Tax (in short, the ld. CIT(A) all dated 22/02/2023 for the Assessment Year

RAMESH P. MEHTA HUF,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh

Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This group of four appeals by the assessee are directed against the separate orders of learned National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (in Short NFAC)/learned Commissioner of Income Tax (in short, the ld. CIT(A) all dated 22/02/2023 for the Assessment Year

RAMESH P. MEHTA HUF,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh

Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This group of four appeals by the assessee are directed against the separate orders of learned National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (in Short NFAC)/learned Commissioner of Income Tax (in short, the ld. CIT(A) all dated 22/02/2023 for the Assessment Year

RAMESH P. MEHTA HUF,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD3(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh

Section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This group of four appeals by the assessee are directed against the separate orders of learned National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (in Short NFAC)/learned Commissioner of Income Tax (in short, the ld. CIT(A) all dated 22/02/2023 for the Assessment Year