Search: condonation of delay

31 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 249(4)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(b)74 Section 69A59 Section 142(1)40 Section 271(1)(c)24 Penalty24 Section 14419 Addition to Income15 Section 143(3)14 Section 250

BHARATBHAI NAGINBHAI PATEL,ANKLESHWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(4), BHARUCH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 393/SRT/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Dr. A. L. Sainiआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.393/Srt/2023 Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Physical Hearing) Bharatbhai Nagjibhai Patel, Vs. The Ito, 392, Nishal Faliu, Nava Haripura, Ward- 2(4), Sajod, Ankleshwar, Bharuch, Bharuch, Gujarat – 393020. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bpppp4227M (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Ashutosh P. Nanavaty, Ca Appellant By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr Respondent By Date Of Hearing 16/10/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 30/10/2023

Section 143(3)Section 249(3)

4. On the other hand, ld. Sr. DR for the Revenue submitted that delay before the NFAC/ld. CIT(A) should not be condoned by the Tribunal. Let the assessee be filed a petition for condonation of delay before the NFAC/ld. CIT(A) and NFAC/ld. CIT(A) should take independent decision to condone the delay of (649) days

NAROTTAMBHAI CHHOTUBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(1), SURAT

Showing 1–20 of 31 · Page 1 of 2

BHARATBHAI NAGINBHAI PATEL,ANKLESHWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(4), BHARUCH

NAROTTAMBHAI CHHOTUBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(1), SURAT

BHARATBHAI NAGINBHAI PATEL,ANKLESHWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(4), BHARUCH

NAROTTAMBHAI CHHOTUBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(1), SURAT

JAYSHREEBEN NILAMKUMAR DESAI,NA vs. ARIVS.INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, NAVSARI

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

VIRAJ SHIRISHKUMAR MODI,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, SURAT, SURAT

RAMABHAI KANJIBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2, SURAT

RAMABHAI KANJIBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2, SURAT

RAMABHAI KANJIBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2, SURAT

RAMABHAI KANJIBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2, SURAT

RAMABHAI KANJIBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2, SURAT

PRAFULBHAI JAGUBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1, BARDOLI

RASHILABEN DHIRAJLAL VORA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(1), SURAT

VIKAS AGARWAL,DADRA AND NAGAR HAVELI vs. ITO, WARD SILVASSA, SILVASSA

VIKAS AGARWAL,SILVASSA vs. ITO, WARD SILVASSA, SILVASSA

VIKAS AGARWAL,DADRA AND NAGAR HAVELI vs. ITO, WARD SILVASSA, SILVASSA