Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 236clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14810 Section 10A5 Addition to Income5 Section 684 Section 143(3)4 Section 1474 Section 694 Reopening of Assessment4 Section 254(1)

SHRI, IQBAL AHMED GULAMBHAI ANSARI,VALSAD vs. ITO WARD-2, VALSAD, VALSAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 294/SRT/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat09 Dec 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) Shri Iqbal Ahmed Gulamnabi The Income Tax Officer, Ansari, Ward-2, Valsad. Vs Ayesha Bakery, Dhobi Talav, Shapur Nagar, Valsad. Pan: Aocpa 3493 H Assessee / Appellant Revenue /Respondent

Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 254(1)Section 44A

section 131 of the Act. As per the statement of assessee, the expenses for production of Pav (Bakery item), out of 90 kilograms of Maida comes to Rs.2,100/- and the sale consideration on production of 90 kg of Maida is Rs.2,430/-, therefore, the profit of the assessee is Rs.13.58%. The AO, accordingly issued the show the profit

SHRI, IQBAL AHMED GULAMBHAI ANSARI,VALSAD vs. ITO WARD-2, VALSAD, VALSAD

SHRI, IQBAL AHMED GULAMBHAI ANSARI,VALSAD vs. ITO WARD-2, VALSAD, VALSAD

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, SURAT vs. M/S. KEJRIWAL INDUSTRIES LTD.,, SURAT

RUNI IMPEX,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3(2), SURAT

SHRI RAJU MAGANLAL PATEL,VALSAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INT. TAXATION, SURAT, SURAT

TARA RAJU PATEL,VALSAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, , SURAT