ASHOKKUMAR BHULABHAI RATHOD,MAHUVA vs. NFAC, DELHI CURRENT JURISDICTION - ITO WARD 1, BARDOLI, BARDOLI
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 1253/SRT/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat19 Jun 2025AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri Tr Senthil Kumar & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1253 To 1255/Srt/2024 Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2015-16) (Hybrid Hearing) Ashokkumar Bhulabhai Rathod Nfac, Delhi Current Opp. Reliance Tower, Vs Jurisdiction-Income Tax Officer, Karcheliya, Mahuva-394 240 . Ward No.1, Bardoli, Income-Tax Office, 2Nd Floor, Opp. Jalaram Temple, Station Road, Bardoli- 394 601 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Abxpr 3858 F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से /Appellant By Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca राज" की ओर से /Respondent By Ms. Neerja Sharma, Sr-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 07/05/2025 उद्घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 19/06/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: These Three Appeals By The Assessee Emanate From The Separate Orders Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, ‘The Act’) All Dated 30.09.2024 By The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac),Delhi/Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals) [In Short, ‘Nfac/Ld. Cit(A)’] For The Assessment Years (Ay) 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16, Which In Turn Arose Out Of Separate Assessment Orders Passed By Assessing Officer (In Short, ‘Ao’) U/S 147 R.W.S. 144 R.W.S. 144B Of The Act Dated 24.05.2023, 18.05.2023 & 19.05.2023. Since Facts Are Same Except Variance Of Amounts, With Consent Of The Parties, The Appeals Were Heard Together & A Common
Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250Section 69A
section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’) all dated
30.09.2024
by the National
Faceless
Appeal
Centre
(NFAC),Delhi/Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [in short, ‘NFAC/Ld.
CIT(A)’] for the Assessment Years (AY) 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16, which in turn arose out of separate assessment orders passed by Assessing Officer (in short
