Search: condonation of delay

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 220(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 688 Section 143(1)6 Limitation/Time-bar5 Condonation of Delay4 Disallowance3 Addition to Income3 Section 115B2 Section 143(2)2 Section 148

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, SURAT vs. M/S. KEJRIWAL INDUSTRIES LTD.,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1509/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 May 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena

Section 131Section 143Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 154Section 68

condone the delay in filing of appeal and allow the appeal to be proceeded with on merit. The Grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue read as under: 5. “[1] On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of DCIT, Circle-1(1)(2), Surat Vs. Kejriwal

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, SURAT vs. M/S. KEJRIWAL INDUSTRIES LTD.,, SURAT

VYASHKUMAR INDRALAL MISHRA,SILVASSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 7, VAPI

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, SURAT vs. M/S. KEJRIWAL INDUSTRIES LTD.,, SURAT

VYASHKUMAR INDRALAL MISHRA,SILVASSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 7, VAPI

SALONI ENGINEERING WORKS,VAPI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-8, VAPI

KALIDAS KURJIBHAI BAVARIYA,BARDOLI, SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, BARDOLI

LABHUBEN MANUBHAI MANGUKIYA,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3(3)(5), SURAT

HITENDRASINH CHANDRASINH BAKROLA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2(3)(2), SURAT

RAJESHBHAI D. DUNGARANI (HUF),SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -3(2)(3), SURAT