BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 220clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna468Delhi241Chennai172Mumbai125Karnataka101Kolkata96Pune81Ahmedabad68Jaipur49Bangalore47Cochin39Hyderabad34Visakhapatnam33Panaji30Lucknow22Indore15Nagpur15Guwahati11Cuttack10Chandigarh9Raipur9Surat7Agra6Dehradun5Rajkot4Amritsar3Varanasi3SC2Jodhpur1Orissa1Rajasthan1Ranchi1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 688Section 143(1)6Limitation/Time-bar5Condonation of Delay4Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 115B2Section 143(2)2Section 148

SALONI ENGINEERING WORKS,VAPI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-8, VAPI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee, are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 238/SRT/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jul 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपीलसं./Ita Nos.237/Srt/2021 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19) (Virtual Court Hearing) Vyashkumar Indralal Mishra Income Tax Officer, Dilu Falia, House Of Shri Ward-9, Nr. Vaishali Char Rasta, Nh- Vs. R.C.Patel, Vaghdhara Road, 8, Gidc, Vapi-396195 Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Silvassa-396230 (Ut) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Amlpm 3623 N (Appellant ) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Lokesh Khadaria, CAFor Respondent: Shri Shaurya Shaswat Shukla– Sr.DR
Section 143(1)

220, Income Tax Office, GIDC, Vapi-396195 Nr. Vaishali Char Rasta, NH-8, Vs. GIDC, Vapi-396195 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: ABVFS4912 K (Appellant ) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Lokesh Khadaria, CA. Respondent by : Shri Shaurya Shaswat Shukla– Sr.DR सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of Hearing : 25/07/2022 घोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 29/07/2022 आदेश

VYASHKUMAR INDRALAL MISHRA,SILVASSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 7, VAPI

2
Unexplained Cash Credit2
Cash Deposit2
Demonetization2

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee, are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 237/SRT/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat26 Jul 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपीलसं./Ita Nos.237/Srt/2021 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19) (Virtual Court Hearing) Vyashkumar Indralal Mishra Income Tax Officer, Dilu Falia, House Of Shri Ward-9, Nr. Vaishali Char Rasta, Nh- Vs. R.C.Patel, Vaghdhara Road, 8, Gidc, Vapi-396195 Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Silvassa-396230 (Ut) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Amlpm 3623 N (Appellant ) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Lokesh Khadaria, CAFor Respondent: Shri Shaurya Shaswat Shukla– Sr.DR
Section 143(1)

220, Income Tax Office, GIDC, Vapi-396195 Nr. Vaishali Char Rasta, NH-8, Vs. GIDC, Vapi-396195 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: ABVFS4912 K (Appellant ) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Lokesh Khadaria, CA. Respondent by : Shri Shaurya Shaswat Shukla– Sr.DR सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of Hearing : 25/07/2022 घोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 29/07/2022 आदेश

KALIDAS KURJIBHAI BAVARIYA,BARDOLI, SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, BARDOLI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 390/SRT/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat29 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Dr. A. L. Sainiआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.390/Srt/2022 Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Physical Hearing) Kalidas Kurjibhai Bavariya, Vs. The Ito, 5/B, Tulsi Park, Gandhi Road, Ward-2, Bardoli, Surat - 394601 Bardoli "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aynpb4062A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Bipin Jariwala, Advocate Respondent By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 21/09/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 29/09/2023

Section 12ASection 138Section 144

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and any other laws, which prescribe period(s) of limitation for instituting proceedings, outer limits (within which the court or tribunal can condone delay) and termination of proceedings.” 3. Therefore, Ld. Counsel contended that one hundred five (105) days of delay has been explained by the assessee by submitting the order

LABHUBEN MANUBHAI MANGUKIYA,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3(3)(5), SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 773/SRT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.773/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Physical Hearing) Labhuben Manubhai Mangukiya. Vs. The Ito, 24, Ramkrishna Society, L.H. Road, Ward-3(3)(5), Surat - 395006 Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aczpm1695G (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 115BSection 143(2)Section 250Section 253(3)Section 68

section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’) dated 23.10.2023 by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [in short, ‘CIT(A)’] for the assessment year (AY) 2017-18. 2. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as under: “1. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case

RAJESHBHAI D. DUNGARANI (HUF),SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -3(2)(3), SURAT

In the result, the substantial ground of appeal as framed by me is allowed

ITA 561/SRT/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat29 Nov 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Virtual Hearing) Rajeshbhai D Dungarani (Huf), I.T.O., 15-A, Sundaram Park Society, Ward-3(2)(3), Vs. Dabholi Road, Surat-395004 Surat. (Gujarat) Pan No. Aakhr 4970 E Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 143(2)Section 148Section 254(1)Section 5

delay of 37 days in filing appeal before the Tribunal is condoned. Now adverting to the merit of the case. 5. Brief facts of the case are that the case of assessee was reopened on the basis of information from the office of Pr.DIT (Inv.), Surat regarding the bogus claim of long term capital gain

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, SURAT vs. M/S. KEJRIWAL INDUSTRIES LTD.,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1509/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 May 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena

Section 131Section 143Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 154Section 68

condone the delay in filing of appeal and allow the appeal to be proceeded with on merit. The Grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue read as under: 5. “[1] On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of DCIT, Circle-1(1)(2), Surat Vs. Kejriwal

HITENDRASINH CHANDRASINH BAKROLA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2(3)(2), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1279/SRT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 Apr 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar, Hon’Ble & Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Shah, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. D.R
Section 115BSection 68

Section 56(2)(vii)(c) is not applicable because the same relates to "other than immovable property and this is not the case of variation in Stamp duty value and purchase consideration as the Sale deed clearly mentions the Purchase consideration as Rs. 1,25,95,950/- and it was never the case of the Assessing Officer that the same