Search: condonation of delay

23 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 2(24)(x)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(1)40 Addition to Income21 Condonation of Delay18 Disallowance16 Section 143(3)15 TDS11 Section 3610 Section 36(1)(va)9 Section 68

TIRUPATI PRINTS,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee, are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 225/SRT/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Surat31 Mar 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.147 & 234/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2018-19 To 2019-20) (Virtual Court Hearing) Rekha R. Shokla, Vs. The Dcit, Cpc, G-3, Deepanjali Appartment, Sai Bangalore. Krupa Society, No.4-Airport Road, Nani Daman. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bgyps2563M (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.150/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19) Riddhi Siddhi Prints Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Dcit, Cpc, 75-1 & 75-2, Gidc, Pandesara, Bangalore. Surat-394221, Gujarat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaccr7050C (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.160/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2019-20) Chinco Textiles, Vs. The Acit, Cpc, Plot No.104, Road No.7, Gidc Bangalore. Sachin, Surat-394230. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaefc0028N (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.201 & 202/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2018-19 To 2019-20) Shree Laxminarayan Synthetics, Vs. The Dcit, Circle-2(1)(1), Plot No.275/2, Gidc, Pandesara, Surat. Surat, Gujarat-394221. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aakfs5319N (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.224 & 225/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19 To 2019-20) Tirupati Prints, Vs. The Adit, Cpc, S. No.207, Plot No.37 To 40, Bangalore. Bamroli Taluka: Choryasi, Surat-394221, Gujarat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aabft4240J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(1)Section 36

condone the delay and admit assessee`s appeal for adjudication on merits. 5. The facts of the case which can be stated quite shortly are as follows. In all these ten appeals, the solitary issue involved is that assessees have not deposited employees contribution to provident fund and ESI within the time limit allowed under the Act. Therefore, Assessing Officer

Showing 1–20 of 23 · Page 1 of 2

TIRUPATI PRINTS,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

TIRUPATI PRINTS,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

RIDDHI SIDDHI PRINTS PVT LTD.,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGULURU

REKHA R SHUKLA,NANI DAMAN vs. DCIT,CPC,BANGLURU, BANGAALURU

TIRUPATI PRINTS,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

SHREE LAXMINARAYAN SYNTHETICS,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT

REKHA R. SHUKLA,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CPC, BANGLURU

CHINCO TEXTILES,SURAT vs. ASSTT. DIRETOR OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL PROCESSING CENTRE(CPC), BENGALURU

U. P. SINGH AND CO.,SURAT vs. CIT(A), NFAC, DELHI

ZENITEX,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

LAXMINARAYAN SYNTHETICS,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT

MUKHTAR RAMZAN SHAIKH,VAPI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6, VAPI, VAPI

MUKHTAR RAMZAN SHAIKH,VAPI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6, VAPI, VAPI

UNNAT ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1)(4), SURAT

DIVYABEN PRAFULCHANDRA PARMAR,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3)(1), SURAT

SANGHVI DIAMOND MFG. PVT. LTD.,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(2),, SURAT

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR.,2, SURAT vs. VIJAYBHAI MALABHAI BHARWAD, SURAT

VIJAYBHAI MALABHAI BHARWAD,SURAT vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIR.,-1(2), SURAT

SAKAMBHARI PROCESSORS PRIVATE LIMITED,PALSANA, SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(2), SURAT

HARMONY YARNS PVT. LTD.,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, SURAT

SNEHA FASHIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,SURAT vs. DCIT, CPC , BANGALORE