BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 199clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka125Mumbai112Delhi79Chennai77Kolkata62Chandigarh55Bangalore44Calcutta37Pune29Hyderabad28Jaipur23Visakhapatnam21Cuttack19Ahmedabad18Lucknow16Rajkot12Raipur5Cochin4Indore3Andhra Pradesh3Amritsar3Surat3Nagpur2Patna2SC2Allahabad1Jodhpur1Dehradun1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 1486Section 684Section 143(3)3Section 1543TDS2Addition to Income2

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, SURAT vs. M/S. KEJRIWAL INDUSTRIES LTD.,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1509/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 May 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena

Section 131Section 143Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 154Section 68

condone the delay in filing of appeal and allow the appeal to be proceeded with on merit. The Grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue read as under: 5. “[1] On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of DCIT, Circle-1(1)(2), Surat Vs. Kejriwal

NIRAV BIPINBHAI VAGHASIYA,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 90/SRT/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Jan 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhआ.अ.सं./Ita No.90/Srt/2022 (Ay 2018-19) (Hearing In Physical Court) Nirav Bipinbhai Vaghasiya Income Tax Officer, 59, Shradha Deep Society, Ward-3(2)(1), Surat Vs Singanpore, Causewayroad, Ved Road, Surat-395004 Pan No: Amupv 4454 H अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By None राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 04.01.2023 उ"घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of 16.01.2023 Pronouncement Order Under Section 254(1) Of Income Tax Act Per Pawan Singh: 1. This Appeal By Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [For Short To As “Nfac”/Ld.Cit(A) Dated 28.12.2021 For Assessment Year 2018-19, Which In Turn Arises Out Assessment Order Passed By Asst. Director Of Income Tax, Centralized Processing Centre (Cpc) Bengaluru Under Section 143(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) Dated 23.10.2019. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:- “1. In Law & In Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Learned Cit(A) National Faceless Appeal Centre Erred In Not Allowing Tds Nirav B Vaghasiya Credit Of Rs.2,21,000 Though The Same Is Duly Reflected In Form No 26As Of The Appellant. 1.1 In Law & In Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Learned Cit(A) National Faceless Appeal Centre Erred In Not Allowing The Tds Credit Of Rs.2,21,000 Though The Capital Gain On Sale Of Property Was Offered For Taxation In The Hands Of Partnership Form & No Revenue Loss Incurred To The Department. 1.2 In Law & In Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Learned Cit(A) National Faceless Appeal Centre Erred In Not Allowing Tds Credit To The Appellant Though No Income Against Such Tds Credit Was Earned By The Appellant Against Such Tds Credit.

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 194ISection 254(1)

delay in filing of appeal is condoned. Now adverting to the facts of the case. 3. Brief facts of the case are that assessee is an individual and partner in one of the partnership firm namely M/s Shri Hari Agri. The assessee filed his return of income for assessment year (AY) 2018-19 on 21.01.2019 declaring income of Rs.2

MUKESH A. PATEL,VAPI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6, VAPI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 706/SRT/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shripawan Singh, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.706/Srt/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Virtual Court Hearing) Mukesh A Patel Income Tax Officer, Ward-6, Vapi Ambalal Ni Wadi, Station Road, Vs. Nr. College Killa Pardi, Valsad "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bjhpp 0041 D (Appellant ) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Surji D Chheda, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Deependra Kumar– Sr.-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 148Section 263Section 55A

delay in filing the additional grounds, the same may be condoned. I am relying on the ratio of following judgments for raising the additional grounds: Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. Vs., CIT 199 ITR 351 (Bom) Jute Corporation of India Ltd Vs. CIT(A) 187 ITR 688 (SC) National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. vs. CIT 229 ITR 383 (SC)” 4.Although